Oof. Very good dice for the Soviets this turn:
Net Allies dice swing: +4.31 swing
Net Axis dice swing: -4.31 swing
This means the Soviets ended up with 4.31 more units than they would’ve had otherwise.
Let’s see if I can do better with China…
China16
IPC=7
Purchases: 2 inf, save 1
Combat
none
NCM
see map
Place
2 inf sze
Collects
6 + 1 saved = 7
Whew! That was close… :roll:
Unfortunately, Moulinex is swamped with work and won’t be able to post for a while. He has authorized me to take his next few turns, if necessary. I will do UK/ANZAC16 and, hopefully, he’ll be back for turn17. I figure that this is OK with you guys?
Works for me.
UK16
UKE IPC=39
Purchases: 3 inf, 2 ftr, 1 dd, save 2
UKP IPC=15
Purchases: 1 mec, 1 ftr, save 1
Combat
alex
6 inf, 1 rtl egy
mad
2 inf, 2 rtl egy via 2 trn z81 > z71
1 bb z81 > z71, bombards
z98
2 ftr z92
2 ftr, 2 tac, 1 bmr egy
2 ftr z81
shan
3 inf, 1 rtl bur
yun
30 inf bur
mad
A: 2 inf, 2 rtl, 1 bb
Rolls: 4@2 1@4; Total Hits: 24@2: (1, 6, 6, 4)1@4: (3)
D: 1 inf
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (4)
mad twol.
z98
A: 6 ftr, 2 tac, 1 bmr
Rolls: 6@3 3@4; Total Hits: 16@3: (4, 6, 6, 4, 3, 4)3@4: (6, 6, 6)
D: 1 dd, 1 cv, 2 ca, 2 ftr, 1 trn, 4 ss
Rolls: 2@2 2@3 2@4; Total Hits: 32@2: (4, 2)2@3: (5, 5)2@4: (3, 4)
Not again…
z98
A: 3 ftr, 2 tac, 1 bmr
Rolls: 3@3 3@4; Total Hits: 53@3: (1, 6, 2)3@4: (4, 1, 1)
D: 1 dd, 1 cv (hit), 2 ca, 2 ftr, 1 trn, 4 ss
Rolls: 2@2 2@3 2@4; Total Hits: 22@2: (4, 6)2@3: (5, 3)2@4: (4, 5)
z98 rnd3
A: 2 ftr, 1 tac, 1 bmr
Rolls: 2@3 2@4; Total Hits: 12@3: (2, 4)2@4: (6, 6)
D: 1 ftr, 1 trn, 4 ss
Rolls: 1@4; Total Hits: 11@4: (1)
z98 cwlo 4 ftr, 1 tac, 1 bmr.
shan
A: 3 inf, 1 rtl
Rolls: 2@1 2@2; Total Hits: 32@1: (6, 1)2@2: (1, 2)
D: 2 inf
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 12@2: (2, 6)
shan lwlo 1 inf.
yun
A: 30 inf
Rolls: 30@1; Total Hits: 530@1: (1, 6, 3, 6, 5, 6, 5, 5, 6, 3, 5, 4, 6, 6, 6, 6, 1, 6, 1, 4, 6, 5, 4, 3, 4, 4, 1, 4, 1, 3)
D: 1 rtl
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)
yun lwol.
alex
A: 6 inf, 1 rtl
Rolls: 5@1 2@2; Total Hits: 35@1: (1, 1, 6, 1, 6)2@2: (5, 6)
D: 2 inf
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (3, 3)
Hey guys. I got messed up by losing with the US and totally forgot to write the walk in with 1 inf in nov. Is it OK if I do that now? If not, just remove it.
NCM
see map
Place
1 dd z109
2 ftr eng
3 inf saf
1 mec, 1 ftr ind
UKE Collects
32 - 2 convoy + 2 saved = 32
UKP Collects
14 + 1 saved = 15
ANZAC16
IPC=26
Purchases: 1 inf, 1 rtl, 1 dd, save 11
Combat
none
NCM
see map
Place
1 inf, 1 rtl nsw
1 dd z62
Collects
13 + 10 NO + 11 saved = 34
Tri-Partite in conference tonight. Axis turns by tues. we have much to discuss……
yes, taking Leningrad with the UK is ok.
yes, taking Leningrad with the UK is ok.
Thanks.
BTW, no-brainer walk-ins like that are automatic, in my mind. So, if one of you guys happens to miss typing one of this sort of move on your own com moves, consider it done.
Italy 16 purchases: 22ipc’s
2inf 1mech 1tac
save 1ipc
combat: The return to Cairo!!!
Cairo: 1inf
6mech 1arm Iraq
2mech qarm TransJ
1mech Syria
Smolensk: 1inf
2inf Bryansk
1strat Rome
Smolensk:
attacker
Rolls: 2@1 1@4; Total Hits: 12@1: (3, 3)1@4: (1)
defender
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (6)
Cairo:
attacker:
Rolls: 9@1 2@3; Total Hits: 59@1: (1, 2, 3, 2, 6, 5, 5, 1, 1)2@3: (1, 1)
defender
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)
Italy 16 final
place:
2inf 1mech Ukr
1tac Rome
collect: 22ipc’s
saved: 1ipc
NO: 5ipc’s
Oil: 2ipc’s
convoy: -6ipc’s
Total: 24ipc’s
Germany 17 purchases: 75ipc’s
6arm
5mech
5inf
1rtl
Combat:
Tambov: 1inf
2inf Bryansk
1ftr 1tac N.Persia
Leningrad: 1inf
2inf Belarus
1strat Berlin
1ftr Bryansk
Alex: 8inf 1rtl
16mech 12arm 1ftr TransJ
1ftr S.Italy
Sudan: 1inf
1mech 2ftrs 2tac TransJ
Samara: 1inf
1inf Stalingrad
1ftr 1tac Bryansk
Kaz:1inf
1inf Stalingrad
1ftr 1tac N.persia
Arc: 1inf
8mech 2arm E.Pol
2mech Belarus
5mech Bryansk