@mikawagunichi Sounds good. What does DM mean? Are you doing the G42 tournaments? If so, which strategies have you used in the past if you have done G42 in the past before. I’m thinking about using a variant of the Middle Earth Strategy that works for G42. I’m just worried it won’t work for a 5-7 round game.
11L 41 Akreider2 (axis) vs DutchmanD (allies+9) +NO -tech
-
Going to try to today… been focusing on tourny game.
-
US 7
Has $49
Purchases
3 subs
3 ftrs
Save $1Combat Moves
noneNonCom
2 ftrs Caucasus > Persia
fleet z47, z56 > z46
inf Aus > Sol Is
inf, art z43 > Sol
subs z57 > z46
art inf W Ca > Sol Is
3 subs z39 > z31Mobilization
3 ftrs W US
3 subs z56Collect $49+1
Has $50 -
Germany 8
Spend 45
9 armCombat
UKR bom > MOS - sbr
EPL arm > BEL - mt
GER bom > GBR - sbr
GER 12 inf, 3 art > POL (inf)UKR 4 inf, art, arm > CAU (6 inf)
EPL 3 fig > CAUMOS sbr
Rolls: 1@1; Total Hits: 01@1: (3)
Rolls: 1@6; Total Hits: 11@6: (6)
GBR sbr
Rolls: 1@1; Total Hits: 01@1: (5)
Rolls: 1@6; Total Hits: 11@6: (2)
-
MOS 6 damage
GBR 2 damagePOL
Rolls: 9@1 6@2; Total Hits: 49@1: (2, 1, 1, 5, 2, 5, 2, 1, 1)6@2: (6, 6, 5, 6, 4, 4)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (1)
-
CAU
Rolls: 3@1 2@2 4@3; Total Hits: 03@1: (6, 5, 6)2@2: (6, 4)4@3: (6, 4, 4, 4)
Rolls: 6@2; Total Hits: 36@2: (2, 2, 5, 2, 5, 6)
-
Wow. I’ll try one more round
CAU
Rolls: 2@2 4@3; Total Hits: 22@2: (4, 1)4@3: (3, 5, 4, 6)
Rolls: 6@3; Total Hits: 46@3: (2, 3, 1, 2, 4, 5)
-
Ok, that was bad. You get three hits (as I accidentally rolled them at 3). That CAU loss cost me 25-30 IPCs (9 for taking it (76% chance), 12 for destroying all your units, and 9 for having an art and arm left over). The bombing raids only make up for it partially.
NCM
CAU 3 fig > EUK
BEL arm > EUK
MOS bom > EUK
EPL 3 arm, 6 inf > EUK
UKR 4 inf, art, 14 arm > EUK
EPL inf > BEL
GER 5 arm > EPL
GBR bom > GERPlacement
GER 9 armIncome
45 -
Soviet 8
Has $28
Purchases
11 damage Moscow
1 arm, 4 inf
Save $0Combat
Eve (3 inf, 2 arm)
1 inf Novo
4 arm, 2 ftrs MoscowIndia ( )
1 inf PersiaCombat
Eve
A:
Rolls: 1@1 6@3; Total Hits: 41@1: (4)6@3: (6, 3, 3, 3, 5, 3)
D:
Rolls: 3@2 2@3; Total Hits: 13@2: (3, 3, 4)2@3: (6, 3)
-
Japan loses 3 inf, 1 arm
Russua loses 1 infRound 2
A:
Rolls: 6@3; Total Hits: 66@3: (2, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2)
D:
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (3)
-
Eve taken with 3 arm + 2 ftrs
India taken with 1 inf
NonCom
1 inf Moscow > Novo
1 inf Persia > Kazak
2 ftrs Egypt > Moscow
2 arm Persia > Egypt
4 inf Caucasus > Moscow
2 ftrs Eve > Moscow
sub zone 23 > z28
aa gun, 2 art, 5 inf, 1 arm Persia > India
2 arm Persia > Moscow
1 inf Bst > KarMobilization
4 inf, 1 arm MoscowCollect $26
-
wrong map
-
sorry. Been focusing on tourny game,
-
Japan 8
Spend 63
3 arm - 15
2 fig - 20
des - 8
2 sub - 12
tra - 7
save 1Combat
BUR inf, 3 arm > IND
FIC 2 inf, 2 art > IND
Z36 2 tra > Z35
Z36 fig > INDPHI inf > AUS
Z50 tra > Z39Z36 fig > IND
NIN bom > INDCHI inf, arm > KAZ (inf)
CHI inf, arm > NOV (inf)
IND
aa shots
fig
Rolls: 1@1; Total Hits: 01@1: (5)
bom
Rolls: 1@1; Total Hits: 11@1: (1)
-
bom shot down
IND
Rolls: 1@1 4@2 4@3; Total Hits: 41@1: (3)4@2: (2, 5, 5, 2)4@3: (5, 3, 6, 2)
Rolls: 8@2 1@3; Total Hits: 48@2: (1, 2, 6, 4, 5, 1, 4, 2)1@3: (6)
-
IND 2
Rolls: 1@2 4@3; Total Hits: 21@2: (1)4@3: (6, 5, 5, 1)
Rolls: 4@2 1@3; Total Hits: 24@2: (3, 2, 1, 4)1@3: (6)
-
IND 3
Rolls: 3@3; Total Hits: 03@3: (6, 5, 4)
Rolls: 2@2 1@3; Total Hits: 12@2: (5, 1)1@3: (5)
-
Evil. I retreat from IND.
KAZ
Rolls: 1@1 1@3; Total Hits: 01@1: (3)1@3: (5)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)
-
KAZ 2
Rolls: 1@1 1@3; Total Hits: 11@1: (3)1@3: (3)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)
-
NOV
Rolls: 1@1 1@3; Total Hits: 11@1: (3)1@3: (1)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)
-
NOV - twol
KAZ - taken loss inf
IND - loss 3 inf, 2 art, 2 arm, bom - and retreat (loss of 20+ IPCs over odds)NCM
IND bom > BUR
NIN 2 arm > YUN
MAN arm > HUP
SUI inf > NIN
Z36 des, cv > Z50
Z62 4 sub, 2 fig, des > Z50Placement
MAN 3 armZ62 tra, 2 sub, des, 2 fig
Income 63
If I keep messing up, you might actually win this one. My Japanese strategy isn’t working so well (and that IND attack wasn’t certain, but it could have gone better).