11L 41 Tyzoq (Axis) v Boldfresh (Allies+3) +Tech Game 1

hmm tricky move, need to think on it a bit…

UK with 45 buys 2 trn, bat (29), 4 inf, art (16)

CM

sud (inf) - inf, 2 ftr, hb (cng)
eaf () - inf (cng)
kar (arm, AA) - 5 inf (fin), 4 inf, 4 arm (nwy)
z49 (trn) - ftr (z50)
lib (2 inf) - 2 inf, 3 hb (gbr)
nwe (inf, art) - 2 inf, ftr, 4 hb (gbr)

combat:

sud - inf, 2 ftr, hb vs. inf
Rolls: 1@1 2@3 2@4; Total Hits: 21@1: (3)2@3: (5, 1)2@4: (5, 4)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (1)

sud cwlo inf, not taken

kar - 9 inf, 4 arm vs. arm
Rolls: 9@1 4@3; Total Hits: 39@1: (5, 4, 2, 5, 1, 2, 6, 2, 1)4@3: (4, 4, 3, 5)
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 01@3: (4)

kar cwol

nwe - 2 inf, ftr, 4 hb vs. inf, art
Rolls: 2@1 1@3 2@4 2@4 2@4 2@4; Total Hits: 72@1: (4, 1)1@3: (6)2@4: (3, 2)2@4: (3, 5)2@4: (3, 1)2@4: (3, 5)
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (3, 4)

nwe cwol

lib - 2 inf, 3 hb vs. 2 inf
Rolls: 2@1 2@4 2@4 2@4; Total Hits: 22@1: (6, 5)2@4: (3, 4)2@4: (5, 6)2@4: (6, 6)
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (3, 3)

man i hope my heavies stop firing so many blanks soon…

lib 2! - 2 inf, 3 hb vs. 2 inf
Rolls: 2@1 2@4 2@4 2@4; Total Hits: 52@1: (2, 3)2@4: (3, 1)2@4: (3, 2)2@4: (2, 6)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (1)

that’s an absolute joke, 2 of three heavies missing and giving that infantry a second shot…  :lol:

noncom to come shortly…

NC

gbr - 3 bom (lib), ftr (sud)
z19 - sub (z12)
z59 - trn (1 US inf)
z53 - trn (2 US inf), 4 des, 6 acc, 4 ftr (z50), ftr (z49)
bra - 2 ftr (sud)

z56 - trn (z57)
eca - 4 bom (nwe), bom (sud)

place 2 trn, bat (z2)
place 4 inf, art (gbr)

war bonds:
Rolls: 1@6; Total Hits: 11@6: (3)

collect 42 + 3 bonds, has 45 and 1 researcher.  income dropping fast!  :|

one mistake in that typing, fighter from nwe went to eca, not gbr.

map.

Tyzoq v Boldfresh 41T 37dUK.AAM

USA has 1 researcher
Rolls: 1@6; Total Hits: 11@6: (1)

USA with 61 buys 12 subs, save 1

CM

z18 (17 subs) - 18 subs, des (z19), ftr, bom (cng), 5 bom (eca)
iwo () - inf (z59)

combat:

z18 - 18 super subs, des, ftr, 6 hb vs. 17 subs

18 surprise strikes
Rolls: 18@3; Total Hits: 1118@3: (5, 4, 6, 2, 2, 5, 2, 2, 4, 2, 1, 3, 2, 4, 1, 3, 5, 3)

dang, i didn’t want that many hits!!!  ouch!  well, this is a rare instance that i actually HOPE my heavy bombers can miss a couple of times!!  :-P  11 subs killed before returning fire.

rest of the battle - des, ftr, 6 hb vs. 6 subs
atk:
Rolls: 1@2 1@3 2@4 2@4 2@4 2@4 2@4 2@4; Total Hits: 71@2: (6)1@3: (4)2@4: (2, 3)2@4: (2, 6)2@4: (6, 5)2@4: (3, 1)2@4: (2, 4)2@4: (6, 5)
def:
Rolls: 6@1; Total Hits: 16@1: (3, 1, 3, 2, 2, 5)

well, i guess it’s no surprise that i got my wish, 2 of 6 heavy bombers missing… wow, they sure haven’t been hitting anywhere near their supposed 90%, more like 66%  :lol:

retreat to z19 - 15 subs killed, 1 sub lost

NC

z19 - 6 subs, des, acc, 2 bat (z10)
kar - 8 inf, 8 arm, 10 ftr (nwy), 4 inf, 6 art (nwy), 2 ftr (z10), 7 ftr (gbr)
z2 - ftr (z18) to UK carrier
gbr - 25 inf, 7 art (eca) via z2
eca - 5 bom (z18)
wca - inf (z56), bom (z18)
z51 - 4 subs (z50)
feq - inf (cng)
rho - AA (cng)

place 12 subs (z56)

collect 55, has 56 and 1 researcher

Tyzoq v Boldfresh 41T 37fUSA.AAM

wasn’t sure if you did it intentionally or not, but i was hoping it was a mistake on your part…  you make so few i have to be sure to capitalize  :-P

16 german battleships.  50 US fighters.  what?  :lol: