The amount of solar panels needed will depend on the intensity of the sunlight received as does the efficiency. Solar energy is said to be a lot cleaner than energy collected from coal, oil or nuclear energy sources, because there are no pollutants released into the air. Through technological advances which are displayed in Earth 4 Energys instructions and information guide, these solar power systems have become attainable to the common man since the price has decreased steadily. It also has become a possibility for us to produce enough solar energy to actually sell the extra amounts back to the power companies, to make a substantial profit.
What government needs to do is back off the money. This will make companies have to look at alternative and innovative solutions. They will have to improve their product to a price point that people will accept. I mean, they have the easiest tag line any company could ask for. No sensible person wants to actively pollute the environment, but money talks, and so we agree to use coal power in exchange for the cheaper price. In the long run, our government is just loving us all.
Shady world Future
-
Russia and Chechnya you mean?
-
lol, thats what i meant ty Yanny.
(to much Ghost Recon) ;)
-
If they go into countries to fight “terrorism” or to “protect their national security” what could we really say against it ???
-
exactly ;)
-
What has stopped the Russians from going into Chechnya? Though Taiwan…. don’t really think I can or the Chinese can see them as a threat to national secruity. :-?
-
the Chinses may bot see them as a threat. but its a slap in the face that it exists. the fact that Tawian exists pisses of China as much as Nazi Germany would think of Israel ;)
-
Which gives no right for Nazi Germany to invade Israel. :wink:
-
Totally agree, DasEwokSS–starting this war in this fashion was a big mistake. Both the anti-war & pro-war factions in the UN should’ve realized what was happening & worked harder to develop some compromise (like a new Resolution with a “hard” deadline for a change). That way we could’ve presented a united front against rogue regimes. Now that the UN has been discredited in this fashion, there is a danger of such situations as you mentioned occurring…
Ozone27
-
o i am for the way in which we handled this, i think China has every right to attack taiwan, as does Russia with Chechniya (spelling) survival of the fittest. but i think by doing it this way its gonna eventully lead to a War with the Super Powers. which could either make the future bright or dark from a certain point of veiw ;)
-
Hmmm…not sure “survival of the fittest” is really a viable political idea. Hasn’t that been tried before? :wink:
Ozone27
-
Yeah, those “hard” deadlines for one. cough cough
-
Taiwan like has nuclear weapons.
-
and like if, it falls really quickly it wont use them :P
-
@TG:
Yeah, those “hard” deadlines for one. cough cough
OK, I was saying a “US-style” “hard” deadline, rather than the “UN-style” “you’ve got 15 days…ok 60 days…ok 1 year…ok 12 years” “hard” deadline. Ya got me :roll: …
Re: “survival of the fittest” I meant DasEwokSS’s suggestion that its ok for powerful nations to swallow weaker ones because that’s somehow the natural order of things. May work for Ewoks, not for humans. I assume he was being tongue-in-cheek…
Ozone27
Suggested Topics
