Thank you. Had not seen that and was unhappy to contradict Kriegkund, but could not see any difference with what I had said. Now I realise without a japanese DOW against UK/Anzac a Japanese player could have moved through an occupied sea hex on its way to a Dutch territory. Now it cannot. Though, of course, my way and knowing I was provoking war with UK/Anzac, I would have attacked them too and, therefore, not moved illegally through a sea zone . You have to love Japan.
Movement Question ????
-
I was wondering if this was a legal move:
During Combat Phase I move Transports/troops and a cruiser into unnoccupied seazone 37 to do an amphibious assault on Malaya. The Assult fails (though it shouldn’t have :P) and my ships stay in seazone 37.
I continue with the rest of my attacks for that turn and during my movement phase I want to move ships into seazone 37 to protect my transports and cruiser. Is that allowed? My friend claims it is an illegal move because you have to declare all attack movements at the same time when concerning a single space, but I didn’t attack seazone 37 as there was no enemy ships in there, I simply did an amphibious assault. So shouldn’t I be able to move ships into there after the combat phase?
Please verify. Much appreciated. :) -
Welcome, Alex!
You can reinforce a space in noncombat movement, whether you attacked it or not. The only restriction is that you can’t move air units into a newly captured land territory.
Suggested Topics
