It would be nice if one could by the 2nd ed rulebook
Yes it would, printing out the set ups can get messy and lost easily, it would be nice to have a proper book…also a shame about missing out on all the awesome pieces.
AAE40 setup ( now verified)
-
They might be undefended in terms of land units, but what naval forces dose Britian have off shore?
-
They might be undefended in terms of land units, but what naval forces dose Britian have off shore?
Looking at djensens setup pics on twitter….nothing. Theres ships to the east but nothing is by or in malta
-
how do i see djensens twitter pics?
-
-
If you ask me, it seems Malta won’t matter much because they’d have to get enough there to be able to sink the whole Italian navy by scrambling, or get a decent land force in there to protect their planes, which would mean getting by the Italian navy, which if you can do it, likely means the Italian navy is sitting at the bottom of the Mediterranean, in which case you don’t need Malta.
-
i know in the past even 1 or 2 fighters on malta has caused quite a bit of frustration for the Axis in sinking transports on their way to N Africa. also gibralter was key stepping stone for British to ferry fighters and bombers to malta and Africa.
-
@Proud:
I’m rather surprised Malta is empty.
Malta is empty and Gibralter has a unprotected AB and NB?
Exactly
Well, Larry did say the players would have to transform Malta into the “fortress” that it was historically.
-
OK when will the US Atantic Fleet get some respect? Only 1 Destroyer it should at least get a CA or a Battleship
-
OK when will the US Atantic Fleet get some respect? Only 1 Destroyer it should at least get a CA or a Battleship
Well, it’s 1940. And the USA has a lot of money……
-
Well since it is 1940 there wouldn’t be much of a fleet in the Atlantic. I mean you do have a lot of money with the US so it wouldn’t be too hard to buy one right away.
-
OK when will the US Atantic Fleet get some respect? Only 1 Destroyer it should at least get a CA or a Battleship
Might be one of the “playability issues” Larry always mentions, but trust me, I feel you on that regard.
-
OK when will the US Atantic Fleet get some respect? Only 1 Destroyer it should at least get a CA or a Battleship
yeah, in 1940 im sure the US atlantic fleet had at least some Cruisers and maybe 1 BB in there.
weak. -
@Proud:
how do i see djensens twitter pics?
Heres the link http://yfrog.com/3utm3sj
thank you so much. looks great!! cant wait to play.
thanks for the pics djensen
-
-
I think it says that there are 4 fighters in the UK
-
I think it says that there are 4 fighters in the UK
Still think its 3 cause i looked at other 4s and its not the same blur. any other opinions?
-
@Proud:
I think it says that there are 4 fighters in the UK
Still think its 3 cause i looked at other 4s and its not the same blur. any other opinions?
Sure looks like “1 fighters” to me……
-
nah its fatter than a 1. I was the original one who did this remember? anyway back on topic….its either 4 or 3 not 1. anyone have an idea?
-
To me, it definitely looks like a 1 but I launched an investigation, resulting in the following:
The only units on UK according to the setup are Infantry and Fighters. I think that’s agreed upon.
If you would kindly load up the map of the setup at: http://yfrog.com/3utm3sj
Then you will see that on UK there is a non-infantry unit on the UK, as it’s kinda flat to be intended to be a sculpt of a person. Therefore, we must conclude it is a fighter. This unit has chips under it. Therefore I believe we can assume that the number is more than 1 Fighter.
-
To me, it definitely looks like a 1 but I launched an investigation, resulting in the following:
The only units on UK according to the setup are Infantry and Fighters. I think that’s agreed upon.
If you would kindly load up the map of the setup at: http://yfrog.com/3utm3sj
Then you will see that on UK there is a non-infantry unit on the UK, as it’s kinda flat to be intended to be a sculpt of a person. Therefore, we must conclude it is a fighter. This unit has chips under it. Therefore I believe we can assume that the number is more than 1 Fighter.
Actually this proves my point. look slightly to the left theres chips under it and its a fighter. Its not next to france pieces.
its under the IC. so it must be more than 2. which eliminates 1. picture is attached highlighting my point.
Suggested Topics
