The pro neutrals will be interesting for sure. I think that rule may allow Russia to enter pro allied neutrals (possibly pro axis as well), but it may be a special ability of Russia (not the US). Its true Russia was very aggressive, and consider part of the axis at the time (the unknown). The Baltic states (as pointed out by Make_It_Round) were invaded by Russia, a few days after the Germans entered Paris (which would be Russia’s first turn). Germany could also be with in range as well depending on how Poland is carved up, or transports in the Baltic, plus it goes before Russia. One could think that if Baltic States is a Pro allied neutral, then Russia could take it over (w/o penalty), but if Germany invades a pro allied neutral (Baltic States) it could cause a ripple effect, and allow Russia to go to war early (before rd #4). Other wise Baltic states would have to be in Russian control at game start, to keep Germany out. Yugoslavia throws a wench into that theory though, because most think it will be a pro allied neutral, and axis invading it shouldn’t allow Russia to declare war early. Then I thought the game set up could keep Germany out of Baltic States rd #1. Germany will control W Poland (containing E Prussia and boarders the Baltic States), but simply won’t have the forces to invade, but you could still have Germany invading by sea. The Baltic will be split now, and you could have a Russia dd in the sz next to Baltic states, but that won’t stop German transports from coming in as they should be able to ignore neutral Russian ships. So I still have questions about pro axis/pro allied neutrals, and how they work w/powers at war vs powers that are not at war yet.