How do you get the picture in the author box?

Oh and i dislike the revised one :x

Go Grant! Southerners should have got an Anglican minister to command I guess :D

A: 96 Panthers ( 2nd year in league, end of story )
B: 03 Panthers should have won! We were better than them, but all the Brady-ites messed it up!
C: 09 Panthers ( Delhomme’s fault )
D: 05 Panthers ( Injuries fault )
E: 06 Panthers ( Slinkey Weinke’s fault )
F: 11 Panthers ( Schedule Maker’s fault )

@U-505:

Natty dread rides again. Jah, rastafari!

Ya, mon.  I’m from da beech…booooyeeeee!!!

Usually about 3 to 4 hours. None if we are outside the wire.

@ncscswitch:

To my knowledge, you can get banned from posting, but not from viewing…

Rather than banning people from PD, I suggest you lock them from viewing anything BUT PD, if they get out of line.  Make the punishment fit the crime!  :lol:

@ZimZaxZeo:

@El:

Now, now, JZ! If It weren’t for Cauliflournia the rest of the post-civilized world would be at war with the USA as the New Fourth Reich. Seig Bush!

Be grateful for the balance they bring to our country.

I, for one, am glad of the balance that lovely ol’ Canada brings to our continent – thanks y’all from up north there!

WHAT THE %$##@*^!?!? Did you post on the wrong thread?

Jan__, I believe Saddam’s last two approval ratings(taken at election time, therefore, equaling his vote percentages were 99.6%(1995, I think) and 99.9%(2000, I think.) Interestingly enough, immediately after both elections, 0.4%(1995) and 0.1%(2000) of the voters shot themselves in the back of their heads. There has been some idle speculation due to the fact that when these #s are added together they equal 100.0% for both elections. No complete cross-referencing has been done to verify that all these distraught voters did not support Saddam. There has been some support for the idea that these unfortunate voters were upset that Saddam did not get unanamous approval.

yea that was me :)