Need some input/guidance on new unit att/def values


  • Hey guys, I’m currently designing a new map and ruleset for an advanced Europe game. However, I want to implement some rules whereby a unit will have different att/def capabilities against different types of units. So - before I get too carried away with this, does anyody know if such a thread already exists here? Please point me in the right direction.  :-)

    If not, then I want to start with the sea units. Destroyers, Cruisers, Aircarft Carriers and Battleships will all keep their existing att/def values in naval combat (ship against ship). However, I want to give them a different set of values against aircraft. Now, it’s only the defence value I’m interested in as ships don’t attack aircraft.

    I’d like your help/input/guidance with regard to finding a nice balance for these defence values. I admit I don’t know very much about the historical accuracy of WWII surface warships anti-air capabilities, so I would welcome any expert advice. All I have managed to come up with so far is:

    Destroyer          2
    Cruisers            2 
    Aircarft Carrier    2
    Battleships        1

    Is that in any way a good relection? Many thanks for all your help.


  • id say a carriers would be 3 vs air and a battle ship at 2


  • Look at AARHE 4.0. We have established all of that and given each ship AA capabilities on first round.


  • Thanks guys. IL, I took a look at what I thought was the file you were referring to. I’d like some input from other players as well please. Did I read somewhere before that Cruisers had more anti-aircraft guns on them then Destroyers or Battleships? I Rock, why do you say 3 for Aircraft Carrier air defence? Did those vessels have a lot of anti air guns on them or something? I’m thinking 3 is a little high for any sea unit but I’m open to ideas! Thanks.

    So it’s looking like:

    Destroyer          2
    Cruiser              2 
    Aircarft Carrier    3
    Battleship          2

    I originally thought 1 for BBs to reflect their weakness against air attack. Any more suggestions? Once I get this matter squared away, I’ll then take on air unit capabilities. It’s all good.


  • aircraft carriers did have alot of ack they had “light michineguns” “heavy michineguns” and flak artillery

1 / 1

Suggested Topics

  • [1942 2nd ] Submarine/Air Unit rule actually a drawback?

    Feb 5, 2024, 6:19 PM
    28
  • (Classic) New Research Tech for Classic

    Feb 8, 2018, 4:27 AM
    1
  • [Spring 1942] Unit changes/House Rules

    Jul 26, 2017, 3:40 PM
    1
  • New Production Facilities

    Jun 2, 2016, 5:20 PM
    22
  • 1941 with all units from 1940 1.0

    Jan 24, 2016, 4:34 AM
    3
  • Merging 1942.2 with some 1940.2 rules/units

    Jun 5, 2015, 2:29 PM
    5
  • Special Units

    Jul 23, 2011, 9:07 PM
    11
  • Land v Air unit rules

    Oct 18, 2010, 9:58 PM
    7
Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

37

Online

17.7k

Users

40.3k

Topics

1.8m

Posts