Yes, if America decides to try and move through SZ 60 with those ships in the combat movement phase, they will have to stop and engage the defending enemies. However, if you clear them out and then try to move your ships through on non-combat they can sail through.
SEA ZONE-26, what the…
-
He was the first person to use the word useless while talking about that sea zone.
And I don’t appreciate the tone you’re taking with me mister! -
I’m only joking around.
That’s the problem with email/forums is that they don’t do the best job of transmitting tone.
If you’d like though, we can settle this very important issue with a duel. I suggest Heavy Bombers at 10 paces. :-D
~Josh
PS - If you show up at my house piloting a B-52 it will be my own damn fault I guess.
-
Haha I know … I was kidding as well. I thought it was understood when I said mister :lol:
But yeah I’m right. -
Sounds like you guys need an outside arbitrator for this one.
Although the word useless wasn’t used until talking about SZ 63, the context it was used in:
another usless
infers that the earlier seazone (SZ26) that was being discussed was also useless. Therefore, by inference, I would support AJ’s position in this circumstance.
-
But you really should go back to the source…
I branched to SZ 63 because of the “rant” aspect of the dicussion about SZ 26, not the “useless” aspect.
So HA!!!
:-D
-
Actually you were not the “source” in this example, as you never referred to any sea zone as “useless”. Mork read your rant and determined based on your rant that sz63 was useless, the same adjective he would use to describe sz26 (as is demonstrated by him saying “another usless”).
Nobody is suggesting Baghdaddy thought they were useless seazones.
For the record, I’ve never used either seazone, so they are both useless to me.
Rob
P.S. I’ve never played revised, so this whole forum is useless to me :-D
-
I have seen people use Sz 63 multiple times as Japan invading Alaska and sometimes W Can. Although I don’t use it I have seen it used however I have never seen Sz 26 been used.
-
@Mork:
oh wow, lots of stuff… well first of all thanks for the debate, it seems as though you guys really feeel as it being a useful seazone, but then again the longest game ive played was only 5hours long, so we havent gotten to the piont were that might become useful. (you dont get troops in brazil originally do you?)
Hey mate, I was only raving on in a humorous way. No one is seriously arguing it’s an important seazone. Brazil stays empty in 99% of all games and there isn’t much naval cruising going on down there. It might as well have been a mutual zone between sz24 and sz26 in terms of tactics/strategy. We’re just having some fun at the expense of your “silly post”. :-)
-
@Sankt:
If I remember correctly, they had 2 subs in seazone 26, but that was after japan was terribly outnumbered and retreated back to the indian ocean.
Yeah, dood! I think we’ve set the OP straight!
HAHAHAHAHA
There was more than that, but that was the force in SZ26. All around the atlantic, heading south, were 3 more subs and a destroyer, plus a bomber on brazil. They really didnt want me to take out their transports.
-
You start from a false assumption…
It is SZ24 that is useless. It needs to be absorbed by the superior SZ26, thus doing away with the pretender SZ24
:mrgreen:
-
i have now checked it out and i gotta say that SZ-63 is NOT usless, agreeing with AJ. i have used it before my self. mostly because of lightning asssaulti move two spaces from japan inot either midway or sz63(alaska) do an amphibious assault and move on to eastern USAin the same turn, becasue you need to attack somethin to use it. and if you already took out midway in an attempt to take america its nice to still be able to assault again from alaska.
but then again while its usfullness is surpassing it is quite unrealistic, if youve ever heard of alaskan crab fishing…
-
I use the sea zones.
pwned.
-
what…. where did that come from?
Suggested Topics
