Game History
Round: 2 Research Technology - Germans Purchase Units - Germans Germans buy 1 carrier, 1 fighter and 6 transports; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Combat Move - Germans 1 unit repaired. 2 bombers moved from Western Germany to United Kingdom 1 tactical_bomber moved from Western Germany to 104 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 110 Sea Zone to 104 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from 112 Sea Zone to 104 Sea Zone 1 tactical_bomber moved from Western Germany to 118 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from 112 Sea Zone to 118 Sea Zone 3 submarines moved from 112 Sea Zone to 118 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Holland Belgium to Normandy Bordeaux 2 mech_infantrys moved from France to Normandy Bordeaux 2 armour moved from France to Normandy Bordeaux 1 armour moved from France to Normandy Bordeaux 1 armour moved from France to Normandy Bordeaux 2 infantry moved from Norway to 112 Sea Zone 2 infantry and 1 transport moved from 112 Sea Zone to 119 Sea Zone 2 infantry moved from 119 Sea Zone to Scotland Combat - Germans Air Battle in United Kingdom Germans attacks with 2 units heading to United Kingdom Air Battle is over, the remaining bombers go on to their targets Strategic bombing raid in United Kingdom Bombing raid in United Kingdom rolls: 3,8 and causes: 11 damage to unit: factory_major Bombing raid in United Kingdom causes 11 damage total. Battle in Scotland Battle in Normandy Bordeaux Germans attack with 4 armour, 1 infantry and 2 mech_infantrys French defend with 1 artillery, 1 factory_minor, 1 harbour and 1 infantry Germans win, taking Scotland from British, taking Normandy Bordeaux from French with 4 armour and 2 mech_infantrys remaining. Battle score for attacker is 4 Casualties for Germans: 1 infantry Casualties for French: 1 artillery and 1 infantry Battle in 118 Sea Zone Germans attack with 1 fighter, 3 submarines and 1 tactical_bomber British defend with 1 battleship, 1 cruiser and 1 destroyer Germans win with 1 fighter, 1 submarine and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 28 Casualties for Germans: 2 submarines Casualties for British: 1 battleship, 1 cruiser and 1 destroyer Battle in 104 Sea Zone Germans attack with 1 fighter, 1 submarine and 1 tactical_bomber British defend with 1 destroyer Germans win with 1 fighter, 1 submarine and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 8 Casualties for British: 1 destroyer Cleaning up after air battles Non Combat Move - Germans 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from 104 Sea Zone to 112 Sea Zone 1 cruiser moved from 112 Sea Zone to 119 Sea Zone 1 carrier moved from 112 Sea Zone to 119 Sea Zone 1 battleship moved from 112 Sea Zone to 119 Sea Zone 1 destroyer moved from 112 Sea Zone to 119 Sea Zone 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from 118 Sea Zone to 119 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from Southern Italy to Western Germany 1 infantry moved from Western Germany to Holland Belgium 2 armour moved from France to Holland Belgium 1 aaGun moved from Western Germany to Holland Belgium 1 aaGun moved from Germany to Western Germany 1 aaGun moved from Poland to Germany 2 infantry moved from Slovakia Hungary to Germany 3 artilleries and 11 infantry moved from Germany to Western Germany 1 infantry moved from Romania to Slovakia Hungary 5 infantry moved from Bulgaria to Romania 2 infantry moved from Yugoslavia to Slovakia Hungary 3 armour moved from Yugoslavia to Western Germany 1 artillery moved from France to Western Germany 3 infantry moved from Finland to Norway 2 bombers moved from United Kingdom to Western Germany 1 infantry moved from Western Germany to Holland Belgium 1 infantry moved from Poland to Germany 1 infantry moved from Finland to Norway 1 infantry moved from Poland to Germany Place Units - Germans 1 carrier and 6 transports placed in 112 Sea Zone 1 fighter placed in Western Germany Turn Complete - Germans Germans collect 43 PUs; end with 43 PUs Trigger Germans 5 Swedish Iron Ore: Germans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 48 PUs Objective Germans 1 Trade with Russia: Germans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 53 PUs2016 League Post Game Results Here
-
I just caught a mistake in the rankings - Arthur Harris was listed with 4 losses instead of 5 - his points were right but not total games, so his PPG is corrected and he is tier 1 instead of tier E, so this will result in corrections to his past opponents as well….
OK - done - it actually only affected a couple of his opponents.
I rechecked several different point totals and they were all correctMainly wanted to let Harris know why he dropped without a result
Crud, similar error with Roboto, so he drops a bit (to the correct PPG) but at least it’s not a tier change
-
Seriously, folks, the Axis are winning significantly more games than the Allies even with your +15 to +25 bids. �I understand a lot of people don’t like to add a lot of stuff to the board to start the game, so you might take a page from the balanced mod folks’ ideas and add an NO or 3 to the Allies.
Or just play Balance Mod, and save yourself the trouble of using edit mode every round to adjust PUs. With a 50/50 Axis to Allies win ratio (26 BM games played so far), seems like it is pretty darn close to hitting the sweet spot.
-
Not disagreeing, but no edits necessary unless you’re adding or changing NO’s.
A fixed bid of units to Russia plus a variable bid gives a bit more to the Allies without as much prerogative to the bid winner and no editing
But yeah, especially if you’re tired of 2nd edition at ALL, switch to the balanced mod
-
2016 League: axis-dominion (axis) over ArtofWar (allies+22)
-
Giallo (Allies) over MrRoboto (Axis) Balanced mod
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=37372.0
One of the worst G1’s I ever had turned out to be too much to turn around, despite all efforts.
-
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=37483.60
regularkid (Axis) over Talleyrand19 (Allies) balanced mod
-
cdnranger(axis) over giallo
Another weak game from my side…
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=36897.195
-
Somebody’s gotta beat that ranger! :wink:
And the Allies lose yet again….
WHATT??? Somebody double check me, but I count EIGHTEEN wins in a ROW by the Axis in 2nd edition. That’s absurd
Switch to the balanced mod already
-
Giallo has played 19 games as Allies in 2nd edition and cdnranger has played nothing but Axis. I’m wondering how much that has to do with their current standings in the rankings…… maybe not much, I don’t know, just wondering
-
18 in a row! That makes me wonder if this game is as out of balance as the original one in the 1980’s was for the Allies!?!
-
If Me1945 resigns it will be 19…… my oh my
-
If accurate ratings are desired, then we should use 2 game series with the same bid for all league rated play. Same with balanced mod games.
The way the league ratings are structured, E or M players are to some extent disincentivized from playing Allies because that threatens their ability to make the playoff.
Experience = higher bids. Masters and elites are getting easy Axis wins against overly low bids. The solution is 2 games at an agreed upon bid.
-
play balance mod, 1 game axis 1 game allies.
-
Giallo has played 19 games as Allies in 2nd edition and cdnranger has played nothing but Axis. I’m wondering how much that has to do with their current standings in the rankings…… maybe not much, I don’t know, just wondering
I guess I need to try a game as Allies…. :-) Or play balanced mod -
-
If accurate ratings are desired, then we should use 2 game series with the same bid for all league rated play. Same with balanced mod games.
The way the league ratings are structured, E or M players are to some extent disincentivized from playing Allies because that threatens their ability to make the playoff.
Experience = higher bids. Masters and elites are getting easy Axis wins against overly low bids. The solution is 2 games at an agreed upon bid.
I disagree Zhukov. I don’t mind playing with the allies and I am certain I am not the only M E tier that is willing to do that, but I do want a high bid to play with them. The basic game just favors the Axis to much. So the allies need the bid, but we all know this already and have known this for quite some time. Secondly. Complaining about overly low bids is pointless. It takes two to tango.
-
BerntBernt (Allies) STOMPS Shin Ji (Axis) in a Balance Mod game.
A crazy strong Italy will only take you so far, it seems.
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=37515.new#new
-
Giallo has played 19 games as Allies in 2nd edition and cdnranger has played nothing but Axis. I’m wondering how much that has to do with their current standings in the rankings…… maybe not much, I don’t know, just wondering
I guess I need to try a game as Allies…. :-) Or play balanced mod -
Hey, man, keep taking Axis in 2nd edition! It’s working for you!!
-
Shin Ji, I’ll have that result recorded within hours - I was just here long enough to check the boards quick
-
Snigg (Axis) forfeits to MrRoboto (Allies +21)
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=37271.new#new
I find it nearly impossible to truly follow the game when only half your opponents turns are posted to review.
Yes, you can view history in TripleA, but it’s no where as easy or apparent what has happened at a glance to me.
-
Huh, I am sorry, Snigg. I never even read the forum post to be honest, I find the tripleA history a thousand times better.
I can’t understand at all, how the tripleA history doesn’t enable one to check what has happened.
But as I said - sorry for that. I simply hate to wait for 15 seconds 3 times instead of 1 time. I am playing more than 1 game at a time, sometimes even more than 10. It adds up and is just annoying to wait for the posting process with USA and China and so far I didn’t see the necessity to post them.
I don’t know if you asked me to post USA, China and Anzac, before. You might have, maybe I forgot, you could have asked me again. It was not intentionally to disturb you.
Suggested Topics
