Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

Axis and allies revised for sale signed by larry harris

Axis & Allies Revised Edition

1.0k

C

chunksoul
last edited by

Not sure if anyone is interested in this

I have a mint condition revised edition that i got given for winning a tournament.

It was signed by larry harris saying congratulations on the tournament win.

i think it was the world championships or something like that basically daak and .org and 2 other clubs played a big tournament which i won.

i live in australia but can post world wide.

Worth anything to anyone
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0

T-shirts, Hats, and More

global 1940

187

anniversary

1914

1942 2nd ed

tips&tricks

bm3

video

axis & allies

Suggested Topics

M

What is the best National Advantage (for Allies) for beginners

Axis & Allies Revised Edition
• • • mozkaynak

4

0
Votes

4
Posts

1.9k
Views

N

If you play NA´s i would encourage you to just do away with super-fortress (USA NA) Invulnerable SBR bomber is so incrediable unbalanced not even funny.
M

Revised still best of A&A as strategy ?

Axis & Allies Revised Edition
• • • Magister

15

0
Votes

15
Posts

3.9k
Views

H

@Yoper:

I am especially interested in this simply because of how this will affect my use of it in the A&A tournament that I run. Being that it is a timed event for the individual games, I am curious as to how the extra need for naval units will slow down the Allies in building up for their attack into Europe.

I’d say it can slow down the Allies from 1-3 turns. It really depends on how many naval and air units G has at the start of G2. It might be enough to sink the AC and 2 DDs that seems to be the regular UK buy for UK1, depending on where they are placed. It also depends if the US landed on Algeria on US1 or not and how Africa is going for the Allies.
V

Need help with allies :evil: (I'm not a noob)

Axis & Allies Revised Edition
• • • Veqryn

9

0
Votes

9
Posts

2.7k
Views

L

I would happily play allies against axis without bid, I’m pretty much done with AAR, as AA50 is much better, but if someone thinks axis have advantage in AAR then I will prove you otherwise.

TripleA, LL, no tech, real time.

Just enter the lobby and say you want to play axis without bid, you will get seriously pwned :evil: :lol: :evil: :-D
L

Axis and Allies - game types error "Log file is full"

Axis & Allies Revised Edition
• • • lukee155

5

0
Votes

5
Posts

2.3k
Views

L

I think, maybe SAV file is too big :? Has somebody bigger this sav files than me?
T

Playing Minor Victory - Allies have no chance

Axis & Allies Revised Edition
• • • the_sponge

24

0
Votes

24
Posts

5.8k
Views

?

Each side has an equal number of VC’s. If you add an Allied one, you add an Axis one, otherwise the extra VC is an Allied advantage.
M

Revised vs 2nd ed

Axis & Allies Revised Edition
• • • mateooo

55

0
Votes

55
Posts

11.8k
Views

N

Responses to other posters’ posts -

Octopus, it’s in my siggy. Ha. :-D

Ezto, all the best players from flames-of-europe can play low luck. When they’re ready to play with the big kids, they can come on down and play a REAL man. Woman. Small fuzzy creature from Alpha Centauri. :-P. I can understand the appeal of lowering the luck factor, but to me, luck is a vital part of the game. You have to have, um, cojones, for lack of a better word. Even when the odds are in your favor, there’s always an element of risk.

Response to original post -

I prefer Revised to Classic, but I can see that classic has its points. First, old dogs don’t like change. Second, some people just prefer classic’s play style. (Three dice for heavy bombers, that was the stuff . . .)
?

Dire Axis Situation….To the Last man.

Axis & Allies Revised Edition
• • • A Former User

36

0
Votes

36
Posts

6.2k
Views

A

Maybe try to let him take Caucasus :-P
withdraw almost all of your units from G in Caucasus to Moscow…
let him take Caucasus, and counter it with J instead!!!
then J has more IPC’s and can get more units to the front than G ever will.
G loses 4 IPC’s but gets 4 Japanese armor to help instead :-)

Why not withdraw all units, you say?
If you do that, he’ll see what your up to…
if you play a little poker, and make a calculation that will lose statistically…
he’ll see an opening because he thought you made a mistake!
leaving it wide open will make him suspicious.
T

Axis Bids

Axis & Allies Revised Edition
• • • trihero

11

0
Votes

11
Posts

2.7k
Views

W

Germany would be ready to rock and roll with an extra 8 in Africa… They would benefit far more than giving the 8 to the Japanese since there is very little to check Japan in the long run in Asia. The Germans would not need to pull troops from Europe to successfully assault Egypt(closing the Suez-sealing off the Indian fleet), and they’d be able to drop reinforcements to prevent an American counter in US1 in Algeria. The Germans can go after the Brit BB in the Med with the BB prtotecting the planes(The BB isn’t needed to protect the transport against the Destroyer in the Med when amphibbing Egypt because the amphib isn’t necessary). The sub could be used to sink the tranny in Canada, hamstrining the Brits efforts in Norway in GB1. They could move both fleets together in G2… without sacrificing Africa. And take 4 IPCs off the Brits in G2 as well… Plus the rest of Africa in G3(would be enough to offset what is lost to US in US2)… Even if the Allies are aggressive in the first round, there is no reason why Germany would be collecting less than 39IPCs(as opposed to 37) in round1, 42 in round 2, and 44 in round 3. This almost guarantees that Germany will hang around no less than 7 rounds(more than likely 8 or 9)… Long enough for Japan to strike down Moscow.

Wilk

@trihero:

I dunno, I’ve been talking with a very good Revised player and he never will play the Axis unless he has a bid of 8 (1 inf in Libya 1 tank in Algeria).

16

Online

18.1k

Users

40.9k

Topics

1.8m

Posts