:-D
Subs rule!
Just wish I could afford to buy more for Germany.
I playtested a strat in the on-line gaming on the TripleA site where I defended Western Europe and bought an IC there on G2. The whole purpose of the IC in western Europe was to place subs in the 3 adjacent sea zones as needed! Specifically to keep UK from loading up troops and going into the Baltic to invade. It also played havoc in the western Med for allied shipping there as well.
Really competant allied players, with a great amount of patience usually overcame this expensive defensive strat. But others were so frustrated by it, that they usually capitulated by turn 7 or 8. :-D
Please answer this VERY VERY Important question!!!
-
Just saying that the U.K. takes a German territory and then the U.S. land there and the U.K. pulls out so there are just U.S. men in that U.K. controlled territroy. Could the U.S. somehow put a Industrial Complex in that territory?
Thanks in advance
-
No because it was the UK that took the territory so it becomes their property regardless of whether they leave troops there or not.
-
Exactly. That’s why you should always try to set up a situation where you can take control by a nation you want to control the land.
For instance, in my tournament game we started with russia taking it all, because they needed the income. Then we switched to England because they needed the money and Russia pulled back into a support role.
It’s the same here. IF you want an American IC on W. Europe, then Brition should strafe (attack iwth enough to hurt, but not enough to conquer) and then have America hit a soft target and build the IC.
-
Exactly the only option in your situation would be to let the territory be taken by Germany and then land there with US boys again.
Suggested Topics
