Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

Using Pacific and Europe Axis@Allies pieces for a new nation in Rev A@A

Axis & Allies Revised Edition

1.3k

M

metaljeff
last edited by

Has anybody have any ideas to ad a new nation to revised axis @ allies with europe and pacific pieces,and 1991 axis and allies pieces. I have all 4 games. Or use pieces from the different games for extras as well. What would be a good country to ad? Italy,china,france, or some other country. Thanks
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0
?

Guest
last edited by

There has been some extended discussion of adding additional nations in the House Rules area, which would be the correct venue for such discussions :-)

http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?board=41.0
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0

Featured Topics

League rules idea: mulligans for patrons

Guadalcanal Tournament at Strategicon (Los Angeles) Feb. 17, 2024

T-shirts, Hats, and More

global 1940

181

anniversary

1914

1942 2nd ed

tips&tricks

bm3

video

axis & allies

Suggested Topics

B

Painted Pieces

Axis & Allies Revised Edition
• • • brettstarr4

1

0
Votes

1
Posts

2.1k
Views

B

I am currently painting my AAG pieces. I am a little over haflway through, and I think I am doing a pretty good job with them. I was considering painting my AAR pieces and either selling the pieces of all 5 countries together (but not the game), or selling the game with all of the painted pieces. I would sell it on ebay, most likely, and post a few messages on here to get people interested to look at them. Which way do you think would be better to sell, and how much do you think I could get for it?
M

Fun Times with National Advantages

Axis & Allies Revised Edition
• • • macphearsome

22

0
Votes

22
Posts

5.2k
Views

M

So I played a quick game against a friend last weekend (we agreed it was experimental and would not count towards our scoreboard).

I was the axis and picked two national advantages: naval night-fighting and nazi scientists.

The allied player insisted on also having two national advantages, so he picked colonial garrison and flying fortresses (I forget the name, it’s the non-LHTR national advantage; US bombers are immune to AA).

Colonial Garrison gave me a lot of problems! He placed the IC in India, which I went for right away, but the allies managed to trade it for a few turns, and then the US player waited till I was in a bad situation and bought two factories in china and sinkian.

The battleship advantage was not that great. It was fun for a couple of battles, but then the US player just avoided my battleships. I was a few turns from opening the suez canal, and my fleet was prepared against africa, but the US player was going to provide quite a hassle.

The game ended prematurely; I suspect I would eventually have lost. The nazi scientists got me a tech upgrade only after 10 tech buys.
M

Please help with national production, may be a dumb question

Axis & Allies Revised Edition
• • • monkeyman525

2

0
Votes

2
Posts

1.2k
Views

M

thank you, he is close to capturing a capital and trying to capture a second one.
A

Basic strategies for Axis

Axis & Allies Revised Edition
• • • aurandon

10

0
Votes

10
Posts

10.1k
Views

P

I agree with the shield and sword statement. It is my experience that Germany on its first turn should buy a transport for Italy and all men. Regroup your tanks and all your infantry into Eastern Europe and plan to take Karelia on turn 3 if possible. Turn 2 can work but can be costly. Germany should buy mostly all men on turn two and three as well and move them into Eastern Europr so as to overwhelm Russia and get ahead of their infantry total. Once Germany has more infantry than Russia attack Karelia with men and tanks only, save your planes. From Italy send two full transports every turn into Egypt and Trans Jordan until you secure the Suez and subsiquently Africa. Meanwhile Japan hits China, and India and then all out Russia, while still maintaining suppremacy in the Pacific by staying one step ahead of the US and as someone else mentioned take out as many US and UK ships as possible while not over commiting your fleet and only losing the cheap expendable replaceable pieces. An IC is a good idea if you are sure you can hold it: Manchuria is good to go after Russia, but can be reinforced by Japan transports anyway, FIC is safer but India is the best of both if you can capture and hold it, because it is two squares “a tank blitz” away from Caucauscus and Trans-Jordan and you can move fleet through the Suez if needed and assist Germany in conquering Africa as required. Not to mention taking precious money away from the UK. Japan would then purchase three tanks every round for India (or FIC) and keep that up until Russia falls. From India or FIC you can also launch a strike on Australia and New Zealand to further hurt UK. If UK buys an IC on India, Japan MUST capture it at all costs or UK will get the upper hand and its game over. If Germany and Japan hit fast and hard as a unit first at UK to bankrupt and “stall” them and get the valuable money they need and at US to “stall” them, then maintain that stall on both of them and go all out Russia so as to hit Moscow on the 5th or 6th turn from both sides, the Axis will have an IPC victory easily or if using victory cities (AA50 and new) or complete victory rules they will be on their way to world domination. :-)
V

New to A&A; movement question

Axis & Allies Revised Edition
• • • vondee

3

0
Votes

3
Posts

1.2k
Views

N

Yes, allied units can occupy the same territory.

Want to add that axis can also be in same territory for defense etc.
?

Allied "Star" Strategy

Axis & Allies Revised Edition
• • • ncscswitch

11

0
Votes

11
Posts

3.2k
Views

A

The only difficulty would be deciding if the Pacific strategy is the right one.

This would be based on how strong Germany is:

Does she threaten Cau/Moscow? If so, you might want to ensure some good Western Allied pressure (western, southern, even SZ14 pressure all over the med as Darth indicated)

If Japan plays it close to home fleet wise (to keep US honest), then again, a US pacific fleet may be sub optimal.

I think if Germanys a huge inf ball in their big 4/5 territories, then it might be best to be happy having them contained and go after Japan with the Pacific fleet… you have the time to do so (and the axis have proven it might be their soft spot)
J

Low Luck, Allied SBR

Axis & Allies Revised Edition
• • • Jennifer

16

0
Votes

16
Posts

3.7k
Views

J

Update:

Germany holds most of Africa with 100% of Japanese forces being diverted to Egypt. England’s putting 6 units a round into Libya (3 infantry, 3 armor) and hitting Germany for 7 IPC in damage every round (taking 5 damage in return.) America is invading through Norway and W. Europe with 10 units a round with 5 bombers doing 17/18 IPC in damage (alternate rounds) and taking 12/13 IPC in damage (leaving me with plenty of income to keep at least 10 infantry, usually 6 infantry, 3 artillery, 1 armor) going into Asia.

Germany has yet to see a round after 1 with more then 40 IPC income. They are currently averaging closer to 38 IPC - 25 in SBRs for a net of 13 IPC to Russia’s 20-28 IPCs. Japan is no threat as they have to move all builds into Egypt to counter English reinforcements.

Germany has no Atlantic fleet. Their med fleet is augmented with Japanese battleships to prevent American fighters from sinking them.
T

Allied options in 8 point game

Axis & Allies Revised Edition
• • • The Red Baron

15

0
Votes

15
Posts

4.3k
Views

R

We never play with victory cities. If Moscow or Berlin are captured, we can see the way it goes, and then the part who has lost a capital city give up.

28

Online

17.8k

Users

40.5k

Topics

1.8m

Posts