Game History
Round: 1 Purchase Units - Japanese Japanese buy 1 infantry, 1 marine and 3 transports; Remaining resources: 1 PUs; 6 SuicideAttackTokens; Politics - Japanese Japanese takes Political Action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for Japanese and Americans from Neutrality to War Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for Japanese and British from Neutrality to War Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for Japanese and UK_Pacific from Neutrality to War Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for Japanese and ANZAC from Neutrality to War Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for Japanese and Dutch from Neutrality to War Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for Japanese and French from Neutrality to War Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for Germans and Americans from Neutrality to War Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for Italians and Americans from Neutrality to War Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for Chinese and Americans from Neutrality to Allied Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for Chinese and British from Neutrality to Allied Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for Chinese and UK_Pacific from Concordant to Allied Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for Chinese and French from Neutrality to Allied Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for Chinese and ANZAC from Neutrality to Allied Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for Chinese and Dutch from Neutrality to Friendly Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for British and Americans from Neutrality to Allied Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for UK_Pacific and Americans from Neutrality to Allied Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for ANZAC and Americans from Neutrality to Allied Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for Americans and French from Neutrality to Allied Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for Americans and Dutch from Neutrality to Friendly Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for Americans and Neutral_Allies from Neutrality to Friendly_Neutral Japanese succeeds on action: Political Action Japanese To War With Allies: Changing Relationship for Americans and Neutral_Axis from Neutrality to Unfriendly_Neutral Combat Move - Japanese Trigger Japanese Unrestricted Movement: Setting movementRestrictionTerritories cleared for rulesAttachment attached to Japanese 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from 34 Sea Zone to 27 Sea Zone 1 destroyer, 2 fighters, 1 submarine and 2 tactical_bombers moved from 7 Sea Zone to 27 Sea Zone 1 marine moved from Caroline Islands to 34 Sea Zone 1 cruiser and 1 marine moved from 34 Sea Zone to 33 Sea Zone 1 marine moved from 33 Sea Zone to Gilbert Islands 1 infantry moved from Iwo Jima to 7 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Hokkaido to 7 Sea Zone 2 infantry and 1 transport moved from 7 Sea Zone to 32 Sea Zone 2 infantry moved from 32 Sea Zone to Wake Island 1 cruiser moved from 21 Sea Zone to 132 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from Formosa to 132 Sea Zone 2 bombers moved from Japan to 132 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Siam to French Indo China Japanese take French Indo China from French 1 artillery, 1 fighter, 4 infantry and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Kwangsi to Yunnan 1 artillery and 2 infantry moved from Fukien to Kwangtung 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Kiangsu to Kwangtung 1 infantry moved from Fukien to 21 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Formosa to 21 Sea Zone 2 infantry and 1 transport moved from 21 Sea Zone to 36 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from Japan to 7 Sea Zone 1 artillery, 1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 7 Sea Zone to 36 Sea Zone 1 artillery moved from Southern Manchuria to 20 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Okinawa to 20 Sea Zone 1 artillery, 1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 20 Sea Zone to 36 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Jehol to Chahar Japanese take Chahar from Chinese 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from Jehol to Shansi 1 battleship and 1 destroyer moved from 7 Sea Zone to 36 Sea Zone 1 battleship, 1 destroyer and 1 submarine moved from 20 Sea Zone to 36 Sea Zone 2 artilleries and 4 infantry moved from 36 Sea Zone to Davao 1 mech_infantry moved from Southern Manchuria to Shansi 1 tactical_bomber moved from Southern Manchuria to Shansi 1 fighter moved from Korea to Shansi 1 fighter moved from Southern Manchuria to 36 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Shantung to Anhwe Japanese take Anhwe from Chinese 1 infantry moved from Kiangsu to Kiangsi Japanese take Kiangsi from Chinese Combat - Japanese Battle in Wake Island Battle in Gilbert Islands Battle in Shansi Japanese attack with 1 artillery, 1 fighter, 1 infantry, 1 mech_infantry and 1 tactical_bomber Chinese defend with 1 infantry Japanese win, taking Wake Island from Americans, taking Gilbert Islands from UK_Pacific, taking Shansi from Chinese with 1 artillery, 1 fighter, 1 infantry, 1 mech_infantry and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 3 Casualties for Chinese: 1 infantry Battle in 27 Sea Zone Japanese attack with 1 destroyer, 3 fighters, 1 submarine and 3 tactical_bombers Americans defend with 1 cruiser, 1 destroyer, 1 submarine and 1 transport Japanese win, taking 27 Sea Zone from Neutral with 1 destroyer, 3 fighters and 3 tactical_bombers remaining. Battle score for attacker is 25 Casualties for Japanese: 1 submarine Casualties for Americans: 1 cruiser, 1 destroyer, 1 submarine and 1 transport Battle in Kwangtung Japanese attack with 1 artillery, 1 fighter, 2 infantry and 1 tactical_bomber British defend with 2 infantry; UK_Pacific defend with 1 harbour 1 fighter owned by the Japanese retreated UK_Pacific win with 1 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is -17 Casualties for Japanese: 1 artillery, 2 infantry and 1 tactical_bomber Casualties for British: 1 infantry Battle in Yunnan Japanese attack with 1 artillery, 1 fighter, 4 infantry and 1 tactical_bomber Chinese defend with 4 infantry Japanese win, taking Yunnan from Chinese with 1 artillery, 1 fighter, 2 infantry and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 6 Casualties for Japanese: 2 infantry Casualties for Chinese: 4 infantry Battle in 36 Sea Zone Japanese attack with 2 battleships, 2 destroyers, 1 fighter, 1 submarine and 3 transports Americans defend with 1 destroyer and 1 submarine Units damaged: 1 battleship owned by the Japanese Japanese win with 2 battleships, 2 destroyers, 1 fighter, 1 submarine and 3 transports remaining. Battle score for attacker is 14 Casualties for Americans: 1 destroyer and 1 submarine Battle in Davao Japanese attack with 2 artilleries and 4 infantry Americans defend with 1 airfield, 1 fighter, 1 harbour and 1 infantry Japanese win, taking Davao from Americans with 2 artilleries and 2 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 7 Casualties for Japanese: 2 infantry Casualties for Americans: 1 fighter and 1 infantry Battle in 132 Sea Zone Japanese attack with 2 bombers, 1 cruiser and 1 fighter British defend with 1 battleship Japanese win with 2 bombers and 1 fighter remaining. Battle score for attacker is 7 Casualties for Japanese: 1 cruiser Casualties for British: 1 battleship Non Combat Move - Japanese 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Yunnan to Siam 1 fighter moved from 132 Sea Zone to Siam 2 bombers moved from 132 Sea Zone to Siam 1 artillery and 2 infantry moved from Kiangsu to Kiangsi 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from Shantung to Anhwe 1 fighter moved from Shansi to Jehol 1 tactical_bomber moved from Shansi to Shantung 3 infantry moved from Southern Manchuria to Jehol 1 aaGun moved from Northern Manchuria to Southern Manchuria 1 infantry moved from Korea to Northern Manchuria 2 infantry moved from Korea to Southern Manchuria 1 fighter moved from Kwangtung to Formosa 1 armour and 1 infantry moved from Japan to Kyushu 1 artillery moved from Japan to Kyushu 1 infantry moved from Japan to Kyushu 2 carriers moved from 7 Sea Zone to 32 Sea Zone 1 carrier and 1 destroyer moved from 34 Sea Zone to 32 Sea Zone 3 fighters and 3 tactical_bombers moved from 27 Sea Zone to 32 Sea Zone 2 fighters and 2 tactical_bombers moved from Japan to Caroline Islands 1 fighter moved from 36 Sea Zone to Paulau Place Units - Japanese 1 infantry and 1 marine placed in Japan 3 transports placed in 7 Sea Zone Japanese undo move 2. 3 transports placed in 6 Sea Zone Turn Complete - Japanese Japanese collect 35 PUs; end with 36 PUs Objective Japanese 6 Home Islands: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 39 PUs Objective Japanese 7 Vital Forward Bases: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 44 PUs2015 League General Discussion Thread
-
Apparently football is a dicey game?
-
@PGMatt:
The Allies are on the clock, not the Axis
That’s the whole problem right there. Ironically the intention was for it to be the other way around.
-
@Shin:
Apparently football is a dicey game?
Yes, it is. If you fumble the ball, it kills you. It’s the worst thing that can happen to you, and it’s often luck when it happens. Also, the football is shaped very strange so it bounces unpredictably.
But still, 25-0 at the half…. The #3 team in the nation couldn’t score a point for a half? That’s bad ranking right there.
-
@PGMatt:
The Allies are on the clock, not the Axis
That’s the whole problem right there. Ironically the intention was for it to be the other way around.
Well, Larry isn’t always the genius that we assume he is. He over-reacted to the Allied advantage of the early version. One thing he did was moved the NO’s of the USA out to islands and territories to the east and to the west that the Axis can now harass. In doing so, he probably should have boosted the homeland NO, but instead he left it the same in total but distributed it out so that you can snipe part of it just taking the Aleutians.
That’s just one example - there are several others. Giving Germany a major in Berlin and putting a minor in Ukraine without any other balancing factors…. Now Germany can’t really be stopped. Too much money in the middle east (Make Persia and Iraq worth 1 IPC, maybe make the oil NO’s 1 IPC each)… I could go on
-
gamer, would you consider a bonus system to reward those players who are more active in the league?
perhaps something like this:
1. 1 bonus point for completing the first 10 games
2. 3 bonus points after completing 20 games
3. 5 after 30
4. 7 after 50or something like that…
you have to admit, those who play a lot more games are exposing themselves to more chances for errors or dicing, and furthermore, their ranking becomes more sensitive to the kinds of avalanche or cascade effects we’ve been seeing. there are too many good players who are restricting themselves to only a handful of games against other elites, so that their ranking stays nice and safe. and something like 6 out of the 8 who are about to qualify for playoffs (including you) got the bare minimum of 8 games, and one of those who didn’t get the bare minimum got 10 (i.e. only adam really put himself out there with over 3x as many games as the minimum!)
please consider!
-
Cascade effect works both ways. People rise a tier as often as they fall a tier, and they have equal and opposite effects.
-
Games between top players take a ton of time and energy. You are having more fun than anyone else. I think that’s compensation enough. These chess matches between top players, where every little bad luck swing is excruciating, is as much stress and work as fun.
I think you would have more fun being the #1 seed in the 2nd playoff. Remember, in any playoff system everyone’s season ends with a loss except one’s…… Don’t make it all about points and rankings and championships - the fun is in the journey
-
Seriously, you have 1 win over a tier E and you’re trying to tell me that I’m in trouble in the championship game?
you keep mentioning how i have only one win against a tier E. well a closer look at the stats tells us that a win against a tier E is actually quite rare (i’m only considering the E tier players here):
1. bmnielsen: 1 win
2. juan: 1 win
3. zhuk: 2 wins
4. jdow: 2 wins
5. gamer: 1 win
6. adam: 2 wins (but out of 29 wins)
7. ghost: 0 wins
8. alex: 0 winsthere are a few tier 1 players who have scored wins against tier Es.
no one has 3 tier E wins tho, at least not yet.
-
You’ve played over 50 games
-
And you have 5 losses against them
Look, I get it, it hurts your pride that I called you out after all your whining about losing tier E status that you had for awhile. I did my best to explain, and all I did was give you a lot of material to criticize.
I’m not interested in engaging your endless arguments about how awesome you are - please leave me alone.
-
Disclaimer: this is not a comment on the content of any of the recent discussions, as I have no interest in taking sides or getting involved.
But am I the only one who is sick of all the bickering that’s been going on here recently?
We’re all here to have fun, guys, let’s try to focus on that a bit more. If you feel like someone is trolling you, engaging them is just throwing fuel onto the fire.
I would hate to see this overwhelmingly-positive community go on a downward spiral, we’ve probably all experienced what internet gaming communities can be at their worst.
-
I know I fed a troll. He’s been baiting me about as much as he can, and it’s hard to resist.
Adam and Dominion have really been stirring pots lately, and I also do not appreciate it. I don’t see how it makes sense to irritate the guy who’s making it all happen and has spent hours and hours recording everyone’s scores, and ensuring a league rule set each year that the majority, including himself, really enjoy.
-
Gamerman, I know I am not alone in saying I’ve got noting but love for ya baby!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJEbfeG2oAE
Seriously!
-
Adam and Dominion may have been vocal recently, but on the whole I would say they have initiated discussions with respect. All participants share the blame in where it ends up after that, in my opinion.
I don’t see how it makes sense to irritate the guy who’s making it all happen and has spent hours and hours recording everyone’s scores, and ensuring a league rule set each year that the majority, including himself, really enjoy.
I can understand where you’re coming from, but I don’t think there’s a connection here. As I see it, Dominion is reacting to the things you are saying, not to your position of authority in the league. He certainly didn’t initiate anything with the sole purpose of “irritating the guy who’s making it all happen” - he has legitimate points to discuss.
We all really appreciate how much work you put into maintaining the rankings and moderating the league. Speaking for myself, any comments or suggestions I make about the rules or ranking system are solely in the interest of making them even better; I’m not saying that the current system, or your moderation, is poor. I believe that’s where everyone else is coming from as well, but then I’m an optimistic kind of guy :)
-
And you have 5 losses against them
Look, I get it, it hurts your pride that I called you out after all your whining about losing tier E status that you had for awhile. I did my best to explain, and all I did was give you a lot of material to criticize.
I’m not interested in engaging your endless arguments about how awesome you are - please leave me alone.
there’s no whining going on. sure i was upset about the avalanching caused by abandonment problem, but after the community spoke out and you agreed to fix, i was satisfied enough and have left that alone. you’re the one who keeps bringing up the fact that i have only beaten one tier E, and then are using that against me to say i’m in no position to make any comments on the championship game (and you said my comments are laughable). so naturally i reacted by pulling out some facts about how rare it is to even get a game in with one of those super busy elites, let alone score a win on them (and they typically take way too long to complete).
again, there is no connection between my record and the comments i made about how the championship game is going. would’ve been better to have addressed my comments rather than trying to discredit me (ad hominem)
perhaps something like this:
“dominion, you made some valid/interesting points, however, here is why i feel i am winning…”
or, if you didn’t want to entertain a discussion on the game at this time, as perhaps it could reveal some of what you’re planning to your opponent, you could’ve kept it simpler:
“dominion, thanks for sharing your opinion on the game, but i have my reasons for believing that i am well on my way to a win here. that’s all i’d like to say on this at this time, as the game is still in progress…”
-
i second that. i can’t say enough of how much you’re appreciated gamer. there simply is nothing out there even close to what you’ve put together for this community. so please, any comments we make and arguments we may get into, absolutely take nothing away from our deep respect and appreciation we have for you.
Adam and Dominion may have been vocal recently, but on the whole I would say they have initiated discussions with respect. All participants share the blame in where it ends up after that, in my opinion.
I don’t see how it makes sense to irritate the guy who’s making it all happen and has spent hours and hours recording everyone’s scores, and ensuring a league rule set each year that the majority, including himself, really enjoy.
I can understand where you’re coming from, but I don’t think there’s a connection here. As I see it, Dominion is reacting to the things you are saying, not to your position of authority in the league. He certainly didn’t initiate anything with the sole purpose of “irritating the guy who’s making it all happen” - he has legitimate points to discuss.
We all really appreciate how much work you put into maintaining the rankings and moderating the league. Speaking for myself, any comments or suggestions I make about the rules or ranking system are solely in the interest of making them even better; I’m not saying that the current system, or your moderation, is poor. I believe that’s where everyone else is coming from as well, but then I’m an optimistic kind of guy :)
-
I know I fed a troll. He’s been baiting me about as much as he can, and it’s hard to resist.
sorry you feel i am trolling. that’s not my intent honestly. i am an active participant in this community, and when i’m not playing 8-12 games, you will likely hear more from me in these forums :lol:
i’ve seen you make more than one reference to how you’re clearly winning the championship game, and so i felt the need to drop my opinion on how i’m not quite seeing it that way.
i have to say i am REALLY enjoying this championship game. every area of the board is hotly contested and there is absolutely nothing boring about it. regardless of who winds up winning, it’s a good fight that we are all watching closely and enjoying, and i’m sure many others each have their opinion on how it’s going.
-
I’ll admit, I don’t take constant (non-constructive) criticism very well
I’m just here to play A&A and have fun. It’s so fun to take over a territory or destroy a bomber on the ground (hardly ever get that chance any more - everyone’s too good). I really think it’s odd that I find myself at the top all the time - there should be a bunch of guys that I can’t touch, but they’re not here. I’ll also admit that after creaming people over and over again, and people telling me how great I am, I start to believe it.
But guys like dominion and Boldfresh help keep my feet on the ground.
I’ve been wondering where the talk about the championship game has been, and finally dominion gives me a very entertaining take. Bold and I have learned that it is extremely difficult to accurately assess a game in progress that you’re not playing yourself. Out of respect for my opponent, I want to be careful what I say. But yes, I am in an extremely strong position and you will see Allied capitals falling sooner or later. I am playing conservatively so that the dice have little chance to beat me. It’s the championship game, not some game against a tier 2 where you can be aggressive and not worry about the dice because you can recover. I’ve made several championship moves, not sure how many have been noticed or appreciated. Again, respect for the opponent.
I honestly just came to the site many years ago to play some fun games, not tense highly competitive ones. But since I find myself being one of the elite players (no reference to my ranking system) and I am naturally competitive, I find myself playing half my games in the playoffs in the spotlight and where every die roll is tense. That’s not my preferred game. I even deliberately dodged the playoffs, I think it was 2 years ago, by not recording an 8th game.
-
you might have, 2 years ago, but definitly not this season. not sure what you want to say with that. and speaking of that, you thoroughly beat me in the 2013 play-offs.
in any case, you can either be competitive, or want to play fun games only. dont tell me you dont enjoy the competition aspect, it surely doesnt look like that :)
dont get me wrong, its good to have better players around than oneself, there is always a goal, then (time allowing). and its also good to have the best in the play-off, so wouldnt want to miss you there. but I dont really see Axis-D or Adam as being a problem here or specifically targeting you. although I admit Axis wont take it lightly if someone will relegate him to 9th. in the end ;)
the league is a very good thing, enjoyable, well run, with things to improve nonetheless (whats not?). all should contribute when gamerman opens the discussion for next season, and nothing should be evaluated in the light of who its coming from. it will be an even better season.
-
9th is decided by the system - there are no judgment calls. I am just applying the system.
I like a certain level of competition, but at some point it becomes stress and work and I ask myself why I’m not just playing fun games.





