It my favorite series on youtube so far. I really hope they do a WW2 series.
World War 3?
-
Don’t go too far in other direction. Culture connections are still very important. And cross-Strait economic ties are burgeoning, which feeds into Mary and SUD’s points about trade power.
Also, the rebuilding of Taiwan is more complicated than you portray. First off, the U.S. only took an indirect hand in rebuilding the island, which wasn’t damaged all that much anyway from WWII. Mostly, the U.S. gave money to the KMT, who did some not so nice things with it (the 2/28 massacre readily comes to mind). Incidentaly, while yes, the KMT did a better job eventually of economic development in Taiwan, while on the Mainland, they did horribly, which is a large part of the reason they were defeated in 1947. Moreover, I am reading into your comments a bit, so correct me if I’m wrong, but the China versus Taiwan economic development case is not one of Communism versus traditional liberal development policy. Rather, it’s best thought of as import substitution versus developing export-oriented industries.
-
And dint forget the looming conflict with Israel and Iran coming soon to a TV near you. This wasn’t touched yet, but its pretty inevitable that something is afoot.
-
@Imperious:
And dint forget the looming conflict with Israel and Iran coming soon to a TV near you. This wasn’t touched yet, but its pretty inevitable that something is afoot.
Sure it won;t just be an air strike on Iranian nuclear facilities much like Israel did in Iraq in 84? Would be in keeping with 30+ years of the US letting Israel do our dirty work in the middle east…
-
Don’t know if an airstrike will do it. Didn’t Iran build the facility underground?
Rune Blade
-
A nuclear war between Israel and Iran is as likely as a nuclear war between the USA and the USSR or one between India and Pakistan.
Gov’t people know what they do and what they say, and where the difference between the two is.A question to some (if you don’t understand, then you are not one of them and it is not polite to answer questions that others are asked directly):
Why is what Ahmadinejad said not a hyperbole … ?
-
Sure it won;t just be an air strike on Iranian nuclear facilities much like Israel did in Iraq in 84?
I assume you’re referring to Osirak in 1981? In any event, a similar strike is unlikely to be repeated. Only at a stretch would Israel have the capability of launching such a strike, as is widely acknowledged in the security field. Any strike would inevitably bring recriminations of collusion with the US, as they are the only ones which could supply such a mission to ensure a reasonable chance of success. And, like IL said, the Iranians have learned from the Iraqi mistake, and moved some of their facilities underground. Plus, intelligence is not that good, so even the US does not know how many and what kind of facilities Iran has. A pre-emptive strike would only teach the Iranians more about what Israel and the US know.
-
i believe they are called bunker-buster bombs. i have seen these bad boys in action. they could get the job done by either blowing it up or dumping a bunch of earth on it, either way the facility would be useless after wards. America also knows where these things are, anything nuke like glows for our pretty satalights, so dig all you want but we can still see you. :lol:
-
Careful, now. The US military admits that it cannot know or take out all potential reactors in North Korea, let alone a country the size of and as isolated as Iran. Plus, only high-energy reactors are detectable. If it’s far enough underground or not producing a lot of energy (which the enrichment process generally does not), then satellite surveillance will be unlikely to be effective. Also, could you imagine the consequences of any unilateral action by the U.S.? That’s why the US is trying to go through the Security Council on this one, and why it’s been quiet about Russia’s plan to process nuclear material on Russian soil as opposed to Iranian.
-
don’t let the enemy know all of your capability’s, sun tzu knew his sh*t
-
Clausewitz would be quite astonished.
-
@F_alk:
Clausewitz would be quite astonished.
touche! :wink:
Suggested Topics
