@Hank13:
OK, couple of points here.
1. You posting your personal preferences in a game you are not a participant in does not make policy.
2. You not liking something, does not make policy.
3. This is something we should have addressed BEFORE starting this game. We didn’t, so let’s figure it out now.
A simple solution for all of us going forward is this:
1. Post every combat turn regardless of the complexity of combats.
2. Attacker states any battle that could have scrambles, interceptors or ool involved.
3. Defender gives their order(s) and the attacks can proceed.
If anyone thinks there is a way to game the defenders by this then we could do it battle by battle. I would prefer not to do this as I don’t like leaving an active combat turn running on my computer if it may be hours until I return to it. I have been burned by this in the past and it is annoying! But if that’s the consensus then so be it.
Sorry for the lists, the teacher in me can’t seem to avoid it!
to address your points in your first 1-3 list hank, i was not saying they were policy - i said it more to the point that if you read the posts, you can see that i do not consider not asking for a scramble choice to be an “illegal” move. thus allweneed’s point that what he did was “illegal” and we agreed with an illegal move to go back to reroll the entire battle - is not applicable. but i already said i’m extending the freebie here, i just want to make sure it never happens again.
it’s all good boys, i just want to keep everything moving smoothly! you may or may not be aware that decisions of this nature can have a major impact on the game - but if we do what we have agreed, we will not have a problem, and it will likely cost us very little time at all.