Childish(and cowardly) behaviour

[aequitas-et-veritas]

Baahaa…didn`t even know about that…and I’m with A&A longer then you wittmann… 8-)

[Witt]

You and I have to have some secrets Aequitas!

[gamerman01]

I have a theory, Wittman.
Weren’t you #1 on that bar graph for being “most respected” for awhile?
Perhaps someone is jealous.

You get so many (deserved) up votes, that you are still +69 and after the anonymous down clicker gets tired of it you’ll no doubt rise again.

I echo the advice of others.  You know you’re well liked, you don’t need a number to tell you that.  You should ignore it.

I read the rationale of the current system when it was implemented.  The idea wasn’t to show how respected or disrespected individual users were (although there is that bar graph in “more stats” that 90% of people don’t know about or ever look at), but moreso to judge individual posts.
Moderators (the idea went) would be able to see what posts had a big negative (like -5 or more?) and that would be a way of flagging bad posts for moderator attention, so they could delete it or intervene or whatever.

So you see, a -1 on a bunch of your game playing posts really means nothing.  He is trying to kick all your sand castles down, but he’s not even achieving that.

[Witt]

Thank you Gamerman.
I understand it was for easier moderation purposes.
I am fine as I said. But thank you for reminding me that my game play needs improving.
That Garg will be the death of me…

[gamerman01]

@wittmann:

But thank you for reminding me that my game play needs improving.

:?

[Gargantua]

your game playing posts really means nothing

lol… I believe this was misinterpreted.

What Wittman is alluding to is the current game between him and myself, which… he had me on the ropes at one point, but the situation has since turned around.

I’ve blasted three major American fleets into the ocean floor, and the only real problem I face is a well reinforced and economically significant Russia.

[gamerman01]

Thanks for trying to help me understand
I’m still confused, but that’s OK  :lol:

I wasn’t saying anything about your game play, so I did not intend to “remind you” of anything about your game play.  I know nothing about your game play except what Garg just said!

Why did you let him sink 3 American fleets??  :wink:

[Witt]

@Gamerman01:

Why did you let him sink 3 American fleets??   :wink:

I know how Garg feels about Communists, so thought it would only be a victory if it came from Moscow. I needed an impotent America for this. I am now in a position to implement Operation Ivan.

Besides, I thought he  would cry if I beat him the first time we played.
He seems a passionate soul.

[Gargantua]

@wittmann:

@Gamerman01:

Why did you let him sink 3 American fleets??   :wink:

I know how Garg feels about Communists, so thought it would only be a victory if it came from Moscow. I needed an impotent America for this. I am now in a position to implement Operation Ivan.

Besides, I thought he  would cry if I beat him the first time we played.
He seems a passionate soul.

Hahahahaha! HAHAHAHA!

A likely story. :)

[Witt]

Seriously though,  Garg is being too kind. He is far better than me(as expected). It has been fun and a pleasure to play someone who is always one step(or more) ahead.
I can only hope he has been challenged sufficiently to consider a rematch, even if not for another year. Then I can start blaming poor play on my age.

[Witt]

I think he is stalking me!

[toblerone77]

Honestly wittman I don’t know why anybody would have would have a problem with you. I like your posts. I mostly frequent the “other” forums as well the customization section or any topic to do with pieces/units. Frankly considering the fact that all I play is solo games or the very rare F2F games, your posts as well as others in tune with “sculpt-hunting” and historical conversation is what keeps me here.

Keep up the good work.

[Witt]

Thank you Toblerone.
It can get me down, but I would not stop visiting and posting in this, my favourite, forum.

[vonLettowVorbeck1914]

@Gargantua:

Everyone knows it’s imperious leader.  I believe this was established some time ago.

No sense beating around the bush.

It was proven beyond a reasonable doubt that he employed a separate account simply to agree with himself and vote his posts up.

http://teamplayergaming.gameme.com/playerinfo/166677

Look up user Lucas McCain and see the posts he made in the WWI forum.

[Imperious Leader]

Funny. I didn’t post in this thread, yet 1914 flames and trolls in here too.

Nice to see you are always on topic….me…which is your only topic.

Are you in love with me that much?

[Jermofoot]

@Imperious:

Funny. I didn’t post in this thread, yet 1914 flames and trolls in here too.

Nice to see you are always on topic….me…which is your only topic.

Are you in love with me that much?

It was entirely material to the topic.  There was no flame or troll.

You didn’t even deny it.  That would be accepting the charge and to me divulges that it is the truth.

[vonLettowVorbeck1914]

IL, We are talking about illegitimate voting on posts.

I don’t see why agreeing with someone that you should be the posterboy for the above is off topic. But then again, that’s one of your tactics. When the evidence gets too much for you to handle, it becomes off-topic!

[Imperious Leader]

Everybody here votes that Karma crap. I used to do it the first few weeks, but for me it’s too much like the old system that causes problems. It should be eliminated as it does not add to anything. Most of mine were positive for others.

Vonlettow1914 does it as well.

Now don’t argue with me, that is just my opinion.

[gamerman01]

OK, my hypocrisy alarm is going off now.

IL is the site leader for post voters.  He has voted 753 times on a post, up or down.

Of course, this does not count any alleged alter-egos he has created.
It also does not include any “karma crap” votes he made in the past.

[Imperious Leader]

It also does not include any “karma crap” votes he made in the past.

Why not?

Just looking at that graph who is the blank guy at position #4? How’s that even possible?

When the evidence gets too much for you to handle, it becomes off-topic!

Right– because the thread wasn’t about “evidence” rather you bring in crap not part of the topic. Get it?