All the sites I find for the book Europa w przededniu wojny only ship in Poland. If you ship to the US, please let me know:
https://lubimyczytac.pl/ksiazka/4984764/europa-w-przededniu-wojny
Wittmann stops the 7th Armour dead at Villers Bocage
-
We know that both sides took out the best part of it (Villers Bocage), but it is sure and true that Wittmann started a single action and knocked out a few Tanks, carriers etc. and stopped in a certain way the British attempt, it will also be true that he escaped and brought back Reinforcements leading them himself.
For now as far as we know it was a one time Single action deal and M. Wittmann deserves his portion of credits!
And as far as I looked it up in all sources I found ,there is not much of a diffrence in that story.
Let us not debate on numbers and scrapped metal! -
Thank you for your time Aequitas.
I knew I should have finished Achtung Panzer!I must say that despite having read two reports from British officers from CLY from June 13th describing the events, neither were from A Squadron, so I cannot pinpoint from my sources how many A Squadron tanks Wittmann personally destroyed. His 2nd Company did wipe out the balance of them after his engaging them.
-
@wittmann:
I love tanks, always have. If I had not chosen a famous German, I would have chosen a Southern US Civil War General as my username, as that is my favourite conflict. Never thought to use my own name!
Here’s a Civil War / WWII connection you may find interesting. In the Ken Burns documentary The Civil War, Shelby Foote refers to the fact that, in the movie Patton, George C. Scott (as Patton) says “We Americans have never lost a war”. Foote comments that this is an extraordinary statement for him to make because Patton’s grandfather served in Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia “and he certainly lost a war.”
-
The South is still fighting the war.
Shelby Foote should know that.I always forget which Virginia regiment his grandfather commanded. Have looked it up. Was the 22nd. (Wasn’t even close in my guess.)
Grr! -
@wittmann:
I cannot pinpoint from my sources how many A Squadron tanks Wittmann personally destroyed
Possibly one (Sherman Firefly ‘Blondie’)but that was it.
@wittmann:
so I cannot pinpoint from my sources how many A Squadron tanks Wittmann personally destroyed. His 2nd Company did wipe out the balance of them after his engaging them.
Their is no dispute most of the Cromwells and 4 Firefly tanks in A Squadron were lost but it is also a fact only 3 were engaged and penetrated by Tigers (2 Firefly and 1 Cromwell) because the majority (circa 15-20 tanks) were simply abandoned and/or set on fire by the crews.
-
@aequitas:
On June 13th of 1944, Wittmann�s company destroyed entire 4th County of London Yeomanry Regiment travelling on the road No.175 to Villers-Bocage, at the Hill No.213.
No he did not.
4th County Of London Yeomanry consisted of:
RHQ Troop 4 Tanks
Recce troop 11 Stuart tanks
AA Troop 4 Tanks
A Squadron 20 tanks
B Squadron 20 tanks
C Squadron 20 tanksAttached to HQ Troop were 4 Artillery Observation tanks
In all some 83 tanks.Wittmann engaged at most 2 Stuarts from Recce Troop, 4 RHQ tanks and 2 OP tanks and possibly the rearmost A Squadron Firefly.
9 Tanks in total4th CLY lost 25 tanks from the original 83 so any claim Wittmann (or anyone) 'wiped out ’ the whole Regiment is absurd
@aequitas:
FROM “ACHTUNG PANZER” allready translated (this saved my job)
The whole account is riddled with errors. Find a better source. Wiki is much more accurate.
-
@aequitas:
On June 13th of 1944, Wittmann�s company destroyed entire 4th County of London Yeomanry Regiment travelling on the road No.175 to Villers-Bocage, at the Hill No.213.
No he did not.
4th County Of London Yeomanry consisted of:
RHQ Troop   4 Tanks
Recce troop  11 Stuart tanks
AA Troop    4 Tanks
A Squadron  20 tanks
B Squadron  20 tanks
C Squadron  20 tanksAttached to HQ Troop were 4 Artillery Observation tanks
In all some 83 tanks.Wittmann engaged at most 2 Stuarts from Recce Troop, 4 RHQ tanks and 2 OP tanks and possibly the rearmost A Squadron Firefly.
11 Tanks in total4th CLY lost 25 tanks from the original 83 so any claim Wittmann (or anyone) 'wiped out ’ the whole Regiment is absurd
@aequitas:
FROM “ACHTUNG PANZER” allready translated (this saved my job)
The whole account is riddled with errors. Find a better source. Wiki is much more accurate.
What’s your source Dr. Lazarus?
-
What’s your source Dr. Lazarus?
Gar, it’s called having an imagination, duh! Don’t you remember having one of those?
-
What’s your source Dr. Lazarus?
Simple geography. The position of every tank wreck is known as is the route Wittmann took into the town.
Wittmann could not possibly knock out any more than the 9 tanks on that road that came into his direct sight.
Between Wittmann and A Squadron there was a large hill (pt 213) so they never came into contact. -
What’s your source Dr. Lazarus?
Simple geography. The position of every tank wreck is known as is the route Wittmann took into the town.
Wittmann could not possibly knock out any more than the 9 tanks on that road that came into his direct sight.
Between Wittmann and A Squadron there was a large hill (pt 213) so they never came into contact.Based on what Book? Historian? Web-site? or other?
I’d like to review the material.
-
Wittmann got on to the RN 175 road at Les Haut Vents which is at 185 mtrs, some 28 mtrs below the peak of Pt 213 1200 mtrs (Yellow X)to the right.
He turned left into Villers Bocage and it is probable he first fired at and hit the Firefly tank ‘Blondie’ shown below. Wittmanns own account given just after the action mentions only that he fired at 2 tanks to his left before he turned right into Villers where he was knocked out.
Note the crest of Pt 213 in the distance and the complete absence of any other tank wrecks on the road. Blondie is the only one. . A Squadron were on the other side of the hill.
The 6 wrecked tanks (2 Recce Stuarts and 4 RHQ Cromwells) are at the entrance to the town of Villers Bocage
Villers bocage is in a depression some 100 mtrs below Pt 213.
A Squadron were over the crest and on the other side of Pt 213.The Wiki article on Villers Bocage is the most accurate account on the web.
-
Simple geography. The position of every tank wreck is known as is the route Wittmann took into the town.
Wittmann could not possibly knock out any more than the 9 tanks on that road that came into his direct sight.
Between Wittmann and A Squadron there was a large hill (pt 213) so they never came into contact.Thats right, HILLS! The tanks greatest obstacle, because it’s not like a tank could, ya’know, drive over it or something. One must wonder how the Tank gained such prominence on the battle field with this huge weakness :roll:
Come on Gar, have you forgotten the ROT (Rule of Thumb) when dealing with Lazarus posts? Remember, whatever he says, the opposite is what really happened.
-
@aequitas:
On June 13th of 1944, Wittmann�s company destroyed entire 4th County of London Yeomanry Regiment travelling on the road No.175 to Villers-Bocage, at the Hill No.213.
HE WHO IS ABLE TO READ GOTS THE UPPER HAND!!
It says: Wittmann’s Company…
hätte es vielleicht doch in deutsch schreiben sollen!
should have written it in german!And regarding sources dear Lazarus, Achtung Panzer is a German source, wiki is not a source it´s more a plattform where everybody could fill in the blanks what he might fits into. I ´ll see if i can get any SIGNAL source or of former members of the CLY or the 22nd Regiment…but allways read with caution, in the end it is all self interpretation.
-
@aequitas:
@aequitas:
On June 13th of 1944, Wittmann�s company destroyed entire 4th County of London Yeomanry Regiment travelling on the road No.175 to Villers-Bocage, at the Hill No.213.
HE WHO IS ABLE TO READ GOTS THE UPPER HAND!!
It says: Wittmann’s Company…
hätte es vielleicht doch in deutsch schreiben sollen!
should have written it in german!Write it in Greek if you prefer but it wont change the fact it is wrong.
Neither Wittmann, his entire company, 1st kp, or Pz Lehr came even close to destroying 4th CLY.@aequitas:
And regarding sources dear Lazarus, Achtung Panzer is a German source, wiki is not a source it´s more a plattform where everybody could fill in the blanks what he might fits into. I ´ll see if i can get any SIGNAL source or of former members of the CLY or the 22nd Regiment…but allways read with caution, in the end it is all self interpretation.
Atchung Panzer is full of errors. You would have to be really desperate to rely on it as any kind of source.
I have checked the Wiki page on Villers and it is by far the most accurate account on the net.
Signal magazine had an article on Villers Bocage but some of the photos it used were not taken at Villers Bocage and one photo was faked to make the destruction look worse than it was.
You can find the War Diary and Regimental Magazine for 4th CLY online but they were in 22nd Armoured Brigade not 22nd Regiment. -
Dear Lazarus, my apologies for mixing Brigade with Regiment up, my bad.
I leave it to this ,that I let have you, your opinion and that I got my view of the events based on what we know and learned from the past.
I also learned ,even when we think we are right ,that one time we all gonna see that we haven´t been right at all and in anything, it all was about to just make the right choices.That said I agree with you to disagree and leave it totally up to you what ever you are going to do with it.
I put allready out the fact what Wittmanns intension was and don’t wanna fight about numbers and hills.
sincerley AeV… -
@aequitas:
I leave it to this ,that I let have you, your opinion and that I got my view of the events based on what we know and learned from the past.
Opinion has no impact on the facts.
It is really simple.
Wittmann drove on to the RN 175 road from Villers Bocage to Caen.
He had 2 choices.
A)Turn right to Pt 213.
B)Turn left and go into Villers Bocage
He chose ‘B’ the road into Villers.
Thus he drove away from A Squadron and what is more A Squadron was out of sight behind pt 213.
Wittmann did not even know they were there.Whilst in Villers Wittmann’s Tiger was knocked out. He was in action a total of perhaps 15 mins and never got anywhere near the location of A Squadron 4th CLY.
Despite this he is credited with the destruction of all the tanks in A Squadron. He was given a medal that says he knocked out 20+ tanks when he could not possibly have hit more than 9.
The German kill confirmation system was either seriously flawed or totally bogus.
-
I just read this on the Wiki source
Carlo D’Este views Wittmann’s attack as “one of the most amazing engagements in the history of armoured warfare”;[201] Max Hastings calls it “one of the most devastating single-handed actions of the war”;[73] and Antony Beevor claims it was “one of the most devastating ambushes in British military history”.[202] Hubert Meyer goes even further, attributing Operation Perch’s failure solely to Wittmann’s “courage, his tactical and technical abilities and […] the valor, the expertise and the camaraderie of his Panzer crew”.[203]
-
I just read this on the Wiki source
Carlo D’Este views Wittmann’s attack as “one of the most amazing engagements in the history of armoured warfare”;[201] Max Hastings calls it “one of the most devastating single-handed actions of the war”;[73] and Antony Beevor claims it was “one of the most devastating ambushes in British military history”.[202] Hubert Meyer goes even further, attributing Operation Perch’s failure solely to Wittmann’s “courage, his tactical and technical abilities and […] the valor, the expertise and the camaraderie of his Panzer crew”.[203]
Makes no difference to my point. Wittmann was given a medal for destroying 20+ tanks when he got nowhere near that total. Massive overclaim or outright invention? You chose.
-
I just read this on the Wiki source
Carlo D’Este views Wittmann’s attack as “one of the most amazing engagements in the history of armoured warfare”;[201] Max Hastings calls it “one of the most devastating single-handed actions of the war”;[73] and Antony Beevor claims it was “one of the most devastating ambushes in British military history”.[202] Hubert Meyer goes even further, attributing Operation Perch’s failure solely to Wittmann’s “courage, his tactical and technical abilities and […] the valor, the expertise and the camaraderie of his Panzer crew”.[203]
Makes no difference to my point. Wittmann was given a medal for destroying 20+ tanks when he got nowhere near that total. Massive overclaim or outright invention? You chose.
This is a totally false claim.
There’s no badge for destroying 20+ tanks in a single day. (Though there are cumulative badges).
For his actions during the battle, Wittmann was promoted to SS-Hauptsturmführer (captain) and awarded Swords to his Knight’s Cross of the Iron Cross.[38]
The swords surely were appropriate - as this was a significant victory.
Also of note from what I’ve been reading - and perhaps this will help you clarify.
In less than 15 minutes, 13–14 tanks, two anti-tank guns and 13–15 transport vehicles had been destroyed by the Heavy SS-Panzer Battalion 101, the vast majority attributed to Wittmann
Wittman was in command… and got probably the most kills.
The only revisionist in the room - is Doctor Lazarus.
-
The problem we have Lazarus, is that we’re probably missing the disambiguation of what the Allies considered tanks, and what the Germans considered tanks.
For example - if I’m Wittman.
To me, a Canadian Kangaroo APC would be considered a tank.
To the Canadians at the time… probably not.
Suggested Topics
