@Krieghund Thanks! (For completeness, I should have been more clear in that Germany controlled Persia at the beginning of its turn in this example. i.e. there was/is a legal landing zone for the fighter)
Any advice on my stiuation?
-
I wouldn’t recommend SUD’s proposed action in Africa. Attack the UK fleet as he says but instead of landing two German infantry in AES, land them in Libya instead along with the fighter from Western Europe. UK will have one less unit in a counterattack on this territory…and you still collect income from AES this turn anyways.
In Egypt: a battle that favors UK
UK: 1 inf, 1 armor, 1 bomber
Gy: 2 inf, fighterIn Libya: a battle that favors Germany
UK: 1 armor, 1 bomber
Gy: 2 inf, fighterBut…If the UK battleship survives the battle in the Spanish Seazone you must move to AES as SUD says in order to preserve your precious German Navy.
By the way…who controls Alaska in this game?
Mapview…go here: http://www.motcreations.com/mapview
Download Mapview and the axis and allies module…the rest is very easy.
-
GG, i thought you were from Rhode Island?
ok….i have another unrelated question… How do you use mapview?
I am from RI…
-
oh, sorry GG… ive just never heard… er… seen… an american say cheers before. :)
-
oh, sorry GG… ive just never heard… er… seen… an american say cheers before. :)
(Laughing) very very true……
-
So Darigaaz how is this game going….I’m assuming you were playing it or are playing it… did you whip 'em?
-
Well i havent gotten a chance to finish it yet, the guys who were supposed to come over have a football game tonight, so all my plans for global domination are on hold.
-
….the game, does anyone want to take over as the allies to finish up the game?
basically a shorter version of a PBEM.
-
BE AGGRESIVE NEVER be defensive with the axis unless you are in dire threat tanks are better for the axis than inf. in the beggining if you amass a huge number of tanks you will be near indivincible
-
BE AGGRESIVE NEVER be defensive with the axis unless you are in dire threat tanks are better for the axis than inf. in the beggining if you amass a huge number of tanks you will be near indivincible
Invincible… no… the Russians are just as invincible as you “are” without the japs help and they cannot be dependent on armor…
-
I said near invincible
RAMS RULE!
-
BE AGGRESIVE NEVER be defensive with the axis unless you are in dire threat tanks are better for the axis than inf. in the beggining if you amass a huge number of tanks you will be near indivincible
Okay, how are you going to amass that army of tanks? If all you do is build tanks and attack early, eventually you will be worn down by Russia’s superior numbers (unless they are buying tanks early as well.) If you wait to attack, Russia will be able to strafe your hordes of tanks and start wasting all that production. Of course that assumes you consolidated in Eastern Europe. If you consolidate in Germany or S. Europe Russia will take E. Europe and Ukr sooner or later, and you’ll have to take that first and then Russia will be able to strafe the tanks anyway.
-
I said near invincible
RAMS RULE!
again if you read the Statistics, 1/3 Tanks to 2/3 Infantry (or the approx.) is better than armor alone… Russia will be the Invincible one…
-
You can check my post in here to see the statistics
Suggested Topics
