Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

Revised Russian Revolution Rules?

House Rules

960

G

Gargantua Liaison TripleA 11 10
last edited by

I’ve read in one or two places that the Russian Revolution rules have been revised?

But I can’t find that anywhere here, or at the HBG site.

Can someone help me out?
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0
K

Krieghund Official Q&A
last edited by

They’re here. We’re also experimenting with allowing the Central Powers to turn down the armistice, but that’s not entirely official yet.
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0

Featured Topics

League rules idea: mulligans for patrons

Guadalcanal Tournament at Strategicon (Los Angeles) Feb. 17, 2024

T-shirts, Hats, and More

global 1940

184

anniversary

1914

1942 2nd ed

tips&tricks

bm3

video

axis & allies

Suggested Topics

K

Operational Realism House Rules

House Rules
• • • KraytKing

6

2
Votes

6
Posts

1.2k
Views

B

@KraytKing said in Operational Realism House Rules:

I am playtesting this week for the first time, I will write up a comprehensive and detailed AAR. I suspect it will be illuminating.

Awesome :)
B

be nice if house rules had it's own zone

House Rules
• • • barnee

8

0
Votes

8
Posts

935
Views

P

@djensen Yes, the old forum software allowed to somehow cluster the mass of top categories, so they appeared more sorted and compact. Now the new theme had them all showing up in a somewhat endless list, that’s why categorizing appeared to be a valid solution to us.

Obviously categorizing (top and sub) is not the best way to give categories/forums a logical structure by clustering forums that thematically belong together. As de-emphasizing or hiding has never been our intention.

So instead of breaking the idea of having reasonable groups of forums - are there maybe other supported tools that allow us to group our categories reasonably, preventing from “top and sub, de-emphaszise and hide”?
D

WW1 house rules

House Rules
• • • DessertFox599

5

0
Votes

5
Posts

1.0k
Views

?

I have posted many ideas on house rules, some good, some not so. But, at a minimum, do this…
Setup: Add 1 GE CA in SZ26 - represents German presence in Indian Ocean. Setup: Add 1 GE AR in GEA - represents gun boats on Lake Tanganyika (can also add rule this unit cannot move). Setup: Change GE AR in SWA to IN. Setup: Add 1 GE IN in KAM. Setup: Add 1 FR IN in FEA. Setup: Add 1 GE SS in SZ18 - represents German presence in Mediterranean. Setup: Change 1 OE CA to TR in SZ20. Setup: Change 1 RU CA to SS in SZ21. Setup: Change UK TR to SS in SZ2. Switzerland is impassable. Mobilization territories: Following can mobilize max of 2 x IPC value, plus restrictions. Bombay: Min. build 1 unit; Cannot build ships or tanks. Munich: Infantry, artillery only. Ottawa: Min. build 1 unit; Cannot build warships. Tatarstan: Infantry, artillery only. Marseilles: No restrictions. Mines vs. Transports: Allow mine hits to absorbed by loss of a load.
Y

Halifax Rules - Unstickied

House Rules
• • • Young Grasshopper

1

0
Votes

1
Posts

487
Views

Y

Guys, I’ve wanted to take down the Halifax Rules thread as a sticky for some time now, but members have protested in the past against it. The fact that I started the thread, the fact that I was the last to comment on it almost 2 years ago, and that there is another thread with over 100 pages that can easily act as a replacement… I feel that it’s time to unsticky it.

It will always be in the data bank if you want to search it…

Cheers.

YG
V

50% bid placement rule

House Rules
• • • variance

1

0
Votes

1
Posts

575
Views

V

I think the allies need a lot of help in Global. Trouble is, if the bid gets too big they can put it all in one theatre and unbalance the situation on one side of the map. So what I propose is a rule for bids that says you must place 50% of your bid on the Europe map and 50% on the Pacific map. If the bid is an odd number, you can place 50%+1 on one side. So for example if the bid is $17 you would have to place 8 or 9 in each side. This rule would allow bids to get a lot larger and give the allies a fighting chance, while keeping it reasonable on each side of the world.
M

AAR Sub rules

House Rules
• • • MrNelson

10

0
Votes

10
Posts

3.0k
Views

T

@Imperious:

heres some manageable rules to use:

I most like the part about destroyer and crusier negate submarine’s preemptive fire on a 1-to-1 basis (rather than unlimited in AAR).

Simple enough to implement for even first time players. Yet quite effective in improving gameplay dynamics.
G

What is considered fair with technology rules?

House Rules
• • • geckosenator

12

0
Votes

12
Posts

3.1k
Views

T

I guess he was referring to some variant or house rule.
No Heavy Tank in OOB or LHTR. Just Super Heavy Tank. :wink:
A

Different Combat Rules

House Rules
• • • Admiral_Thrawn

3

0
Votes

3
Posts

1.5k
Views

I

Admiral: I know where you got your name!

anyway a national unit value list would be possible only with a d12 system goto harrisgamedesign and you will find the official way how we did it over at his site.

called d12 unit value list.

19

Online

18.0k

Users

40.8k

Topics

1.8m

Posts