@Brain:
Also, bump.
Why do I see people posting “bump”? What does that mean?
It’s essentially an empty post that attempts to bring the thread back to the first page of the list
Thanks for your help a +1 to you
A&A Vets: RE: New Vs. Old A &A games…
-
Hi y’all. So about A & A Pacific/Europe–which is better? Is it hard to get used to 1 player vs. everyone else (a particular worry of mine)? It’s looking like we might be losing a player for a while & I’m wondering if there may be a good 3-4 player alternative to the “world” game…besides Diplomacy of course which my buddies seem to lack the b**ls for of late… :wink:
Ozone27
-
i personally like europe more, and i like both europe and pacific more than the original.
-
I personlly like Pacific. Got to love those naval battles:lol: (AAP is mostly naval battles and AAE is mostly ground battles. If that helped)
-
Love the original. AAP and AAE tend to fall into paterns, and last max 6 turns. Past turn two there are no real paterns for AA, and games can last much, much longer.
-
I say get Europe, they’re both awesome but i personally prefer Europe, and Europe’s cheaper than Pacific here in Canada.
-
Cool. Are either of them good w/ 3 players, 'cuz that may be what we’re stuck with for a few months (new babies & such)?
I’m really into naval battles, but I’ve heard elsewhere that Europe is the better game…
Hey Drumstix, do you play the drums?
Ozone27
-
While I agree that both tend to get predictable, I think Pacific is the better choice of the two. Europe gets predictable after two or three games while I think it takes a bit longer to figure Pacific out. Unless you read all the posts here ;)
-
i like europe simply bc im a german guy and pacific doesnt have em^_^ but its to short playtime being over w/in like 4-5 turns. takes longer to set up the dern board
Suggested Topics
