2013 - AAG 40 League

[Amon-Sul]

@Gamerman01:

@Gamerman01:

YES battleships conduct blockade losses like normal

I meant to say DAMAGED battleships conduct blockade damage just as an undamaged

THE ONLY difference between a damaged battleship and an undamaged one is that it only takes one more hit to sink a damaged battleship.

And, of course, a sub can sink a damaged battleship with a single hit and that battleship cannot fire back, whereas an undamaged battleship (or carrier) can absorb a sub surprise strike and still fire back!

You mean undamaged?. Thank U :)

[gamerman01]

No, I mean it only takes one more hit to sink a damaged battleship
It takes 2 hits to sink an undamaged

I was not comparing damaged to undamaged in that statement
You thought I was saying it takes one more hit to sink an undamaged bship than a damaged  :-)

No worries!  You understand now!  :-)

[gamerman01]

@Gamerman01:

I was not comparing damaged to undamaged in that statement

OK, I was comparing, but I should have added on the end of the statement “while it takes two hits to sink an undamaged battleship”  :-)

[Jennifer]

@Gamerman01:

And, of course, a sub can sink a damaged battleship with a single hit and that battleship cannot fire back, whereas an undamaged battleship (or carrier) can absorb a sub surprise strike and still fire back!

“Admiral Leroy Jenkins, you make sure to sail that aircraft carrier so that it intercepts that torpedo strike before it hits that cheap destroyer!”

Yea, it never made sense to me either.

[seth4god]

@Cmdr:

“Admiral Leroy Jenkins, you make sure to sail that aircraft carrier so that it intercepts that torpedo strike before it hits that cheap destroyer!”

Yea, it never made sense to me either.

The whole concept that the player gets to CHOOSE what he loses is a tad unrealistic period. :-p

Oh hey yeah, lose the French first.

[Amon-Sul]

Is there a limit to Chinese placement per territory?

Thank U :)

[gamerman01]

No limit whatsoever

[gamerman01]

Please use FAQ thread for game rule questions so that more players can benefit - thanx

[Jennifer]

@seththenewb:

@Cmdr:

“Admiral Leroy Jenkins, you make sure to sail that aircraft carrier so that it intercepts that torpedo strike before it hits that cheap destroyer!”

Yea, it never made sense to me either.

The whole concept that the player gets to CHOOSE what he loses is a tad unrealistic period. :-p

Oh hey yeah, lose the French first.

Wait, that’s realistic!  It’s THE FRENCH!  If you don’t use them as canon fodder, they’ll just surrender!

[Karl7]

Are we ever going to have a 2013 tournament?

[seth4god]

Would there be any issue with starting a game off forum and counting it towards the league standings? I have an opponent who want to test out a secret strategy for use against someone else. But I don’t want to let him (Bold) off the hook with a nonrated game 2. Maybe if we post a start thread and the bid but don’t use the thread otherwise until we post the results?

[gamerman01]

Pretty sure league games have to be full disclosure

Bold and his precious secret strategies…  :roll:

If he wants league wins with his special strategies, he’s gotta show the cards…
Can’t have it both ways

[seth4god]

@Gamerman01:

Pretty sure league games have to be full disclosure

Bold and his precious secret strategies…  :roll:

If he wants league wins with his special strategies, he’s gotta show the cards…
Can’t have it both ways

I’m the one who wants the credit for the league win, since I know I’m going to win.  :evil:

What if we post the results and the map when it’s all said and done?

[gamerman01]

I don’t know
You’ll have to ask Jennifer anyway

[arathorn]

@Karl7:

Are we ever going to have a 2013 tournament?

I would sure hope so.

I am in favour of a 2v2 tournament, with 24h posting time limits.

I’m throwing in $50 if someone is interested. Anyone else?

[Karl7]

I am

[boldfresh]

@arathorn:

@Karl7:

Are we ever going to have a 2013 tournament?

I would sure hope so.

I am in favour of a 2v2 tournament, with 24h posting time limits.

I’m throwing in $50 if someone is interested. Anyone else?

Im in for 50

[arathorn]

@Boldfresh:

@arathorn:

@Karl7:

Are we ever going to have a 2013 tournament?

I would sure hope so.

I am in favour of a 2v2 tournament, with 24h posting time limits.

I’m throwing in $50 if someone is interested. Anyone else?

Im in for 50

With Karl, Bold and myself already in for $50, we’re at $150…

Clearly this should create some interest!

[seth4god]

I can throw in a cool thousand . . .  monopoly dollars, maybe even 1500!

I don’t have spare cash laying around, but I’d play in the tourney.  :-D

[boldfresh]

each should give as they are able.  no one can tell me they don’t have a few extra bucks laying around.  :wink: