There were no changes to the treatment of neutrals in general, but the Soviet-Mongolian Defense Pact was added in the 2nd Edition.
2nd edition NOs
-
Damn,
So russia still gets +3 for 0 ipc african axis territory.
-
Damn,
So russia still gets +3 for 0 ipc african axis territory.
Allies are still on the ropes in this one. I haven’t seen them win an Alpha +3 game, and looks like the same situation here.
-
Hm - I just won with the Allies, and no bid
Game before that was a nail-biter
Do you play online, robbie? -
-
The German NO for Swedish Ore should have included no allied warships in the Baltic Sea. To many games where the Germans ignore the Russian sub, and it has nothing to do.
-
I’m with you Gamerman… the allies are easier to play IMO…
But alot of people don’t get how to coordinate their efforts, or run large scale interference and spider-web campaigns.
Oh well. :P
-
I’m with you Gamerman… the allies are easier to play IMO…
But alot of people don’t get how to coordinate their efforts, or run large scale interference and spider-web campaigns.
Oh well. :P
Yeah, that must be it. You have to give me IPC’s to take the Axis…. At least 6 for an extra German sub
-
Very little room for error as the Axis.
-
Really? Wow, public opinion is against me here.
No, I don’t play online. Only in person with my nice new set.
200th post!!!
-
Aw, it’s only like 3 of us Robbie
Any chance you would start playing online here? No fumbling with the pieces and chips in small spaces!
-
Nah, the game kinda loses a bit of its luster playing without the pieces. Besides, I get enough in-person play from the guys around here anyways.
My mission is to have the most baller A&A set in the known universe. I’ll have to post pictures sometime.
-
Yeah, do that. We enjoy pictures of customized or painted sets, including impressive man caves, etc.
-
There outta be a thread for things like that.
-
Suggested Topics
