@The_Good_Captain Nice, I’ll stay tunned!
Jercules (Axis) vs. ??? (Moscow in 5–can it be done?)
-
G4 - 76 IPCs
PURCHASES
-4 bombers
-2 tacs
-2 inf.COMBAT
-2 inf., 1 bomber vs. Leningrad
-11 tanks, 1 mech. vs. SUk
-stack takes BRYLENINGRAD
Rolls: 2@1 1@4; Total Hits: 12@1: (5, 2)1@4: (1)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (6)
SUk
Rolls: 11@3; Total Hits: 811@3: (3, 2, 1, 2, 3, 4, 2, 5, 5, 2, 3)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)
-
NC
-bomber to GER
-3 inf., 1 art. from France to WG
-2 inf. from Yugo to ROM
-4 inf. from Finland to NORPLACE
-2 inf., 3 bombers in GER
-1 bomber, 2 tac. in RomaniaCOLLECTS
57 - NOR CON - NORM CONNOR CON
Rolls: 3@3; Total Hits: 23@3: (2, 3, 6)
NORM CON
Rolls: 2@3; Total Hits: 12@3: (6, 1)
-
Germany collects 54 IPCs.
-
USSR 4
Buy (30/30)
7 repairs
6 inf
1 aaNCM:
9 inf, 2 art, 2 aa volo >> rus
2 inf sam >> rus
2 mech, 1 tact vol >> rus
2 inf novo >> volo
7 inf tim >> novo
11 inf, 2 aa yen >> tim
1 inf dza >> yen
2 inf yak >> yen
1 inf bel >> smo
1 inf, 1 art vol >> sam
1 inf, 1 art cau >> kaz
2 inf npr >> irqMobilize:
7 repairs rus major
6 inf, 1 aa rusCollect 24 IPC
-
J4 - 51 IPCs
PURCHASES
-3 dd’s
-save 27COMBAT
-1 bombers, 1 sub vs. sz37; 1 bomber, 1 sub vs. Borneo Coast
-8 f., 8 tac., 3 tanks, 1 art. vs. Burma
-1 inf. takes SZE
-1 inf. takes YAKBURMA AA’s
Rolls: 9@1; Total Hits: 19@1: (3, 6, 2, 5, 4, 1, 6, 5, 5)
-
1 f. lost.
BURMA
Rolls: 1@2 10@3 8@4; Total Hits: 101@2: (4)10@3: (5, 6, 2, 6, 6, 3, 1, 5, 2, 6)8@4: (4, 3, 4, 2, 6, 2, 6, 1)
Rolls: 11@2 1@3; Total Hits: 611@2: (2, 2, 3, 2, 2, 2, 1, 6, 6, 6, 3)1@3: (4)
-
Burma
Rolls: 7@3 6@4; Total Hits: 97@3: (5, 2, 4, 3, 1, 4, 1)6@4: (4, 3, 2, 2, 2, 6)
Rolls: 4@2 1@3; Total Hits: 04@2: (4, 6, 6, 5)1@3: (6)
-
Well, that might’ve been a bad decision to continue, but it looks like my luck is holding out.
SZ37
Rolls: 1@2 1@4; Total Hits: 11@2: (3)1@4: (1)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (6)
SZ43
Rolls: 1@2 1@4; Total Hits: 11@2: (4)1@4: (4)
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (2)
-
FORGOTTEN BATTLE: A big one–SBR on Iraq
IRAQ AA
Rolls: 1@1; Total Hits: 01@1: (2)
-
IRAQ DAMAGE (think of the videos/pictures we could post for this!)
Rolls: 1@6; Total Hits: 11@6: (6)+ 2
-
So maxed out.
NC
-2 tac., 1 f. to Yunnan
-5 f., 5 tac. to KWA
-1 inf., 1 art., 6 inf. merge in JEHOL
-1 trans. to Japan
-sz16 dd to sz6
-2 bombers to KWA
-1 dd to sz42
-rest of navy to sz41 with 6 inf., 3 art.
-1 dd to PHI coast
-rest on mapPLACE
-3 dd’s in sz36COLLECTS
27 + 43 = 70 IPCs -
I guess I’m being a prick here, but whatever; I remember a rule about convoy blocks being stated: I officially state no convy blocks for Japan except for the Phillipines. Whether or not you recognize that is another story :wink:
-
Heheheheh, took me a minute to understand what you meant.
You do have the option to ignore it if an Allied power (for whatever reason) fails to identify a convoy situation on their turn. With a threatened Calcutta sack, hypothetically :-D , this would make for better loot.
However, you can’t stop an Allied power from reducing their income if they accurately identify a convoy situation affecting their income on their own turn.
-
I expected you to hit Burma but, man, I did not predict your naval block off Sumatra. Well played.
-
Thanks, I’m sure you know how it is… stare at the screen long enough, and you’re bound to figure something out.
-
However, you can’t stop an Allied power from reducing their income if they accurately identify a convoy situation affecting their income on their own turn.
Actually, if I can butt in very quickly to clarify something-
In the Pacific rule book-
Pg 20, “Conduct Convoy Disruptions”3. At least one enemy warship must be in the sea zone, and the intent to disrupt the convoy must be declared.
The convoyer - Jerc - can actually opt not to convoy you in Calcutta simply by declaring that desire. Even if you see it before him. :-D
Something interesting to point out. -
I only have the European rulebook which doesn’t include intent among its conditions.
Now I’m not sure whether Global follows Europe or Pacific in this matter, so I will ask in the FAQ thread.
And no worries Alsch, I definitely don’t want to find out several turns later that I was wrong and mess up the whole game.
-
Yeah sorry about that; I’m sure I seem like a prude here.
I just think it’s an interesting note that most people seem to overlook. Either that, or I’m entirely wrong. :lol:I remembered having an identical conversation in one of my games. I figured you might find it interesting. Feel free to ignore it if you’d prefer. :-D
-
The answer I received in the Global FAQ said intent isn’t relevant in Global. If Gamerman is mistaken, then I am sure Krieghund will post.
US4
Buy (77/77)
3 fig
2 strat
1 trans
1 carrierCM:
SZ6
2 fig, 1 strat wakSZ35
1 fig wak
1 dest sz45SZ41
2 fig sz55
3 fig, 1 tact sz54SZ42
1 dest, 1 cru sz55SZ47
1 dest, 1 cru sz55SFE
1 inf, 1 mech wus load trans sz10 >> sz4 unload sfeCAR
2 trans (loaded) sz55 >> sz33 unload car
1 trans (loaded) sz54 >> sz33 unload car
1 bsh sz55 >> sz33 bombard car
1 cru sz54 >> sz33 bombard car -
SZ6
A 2 fig, 1 strat
Rolls: 2@3 1@4; Total Hits: 22@3: (3, 5)1@4: (4)
D 1 dest
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (1)