@Kreuzfeld:
@Xandax:
@Cow:
here. You get +2 for persia, then +5 from Iraq right after.
There is more…
And to take Iraq, you need to attack so you’ll have to dedicate some units that can punch through the inf defence - so where that ‘+5’ you mentions comes from I don’t know. (If it isn’t flipped by Axis already).
Plus you can’t take them until Russia is at war and it takes you two turns after the war declaration to get to Persia unless Britain (or somebody else) have flipped East Persia (or NW Persia).
And if you get a mech inf into Italian Somali land, I wonder what Italy is doing and whether or not it isn’t also something that Britain needs to capture if free.
I don’t think you completely understood. the “trick” is to have uk take east persia, that way USSR can take persia the turn they go to war, with a mech and a panzer.
the advantage of that is that now you have 1 mech, 1 arm, 3 inf, and possibly 1 tac for an attack on iraq. with the, so that is + 5 (+2 for the terr,l + 3 for the NO since iraq is pro axis, they don’t need to be aligned by italy for this)
when you already have the ussr mech in iraq, you are 3 moves, or one trainne move away from italian somali land, which is a 0 income terr, but the USSR gets the NO for it too. so combine it all and USSR can get 10 EXTRA income from about round 5.
why UK would take italian somaliland when USSR is in position to take it is beyond me. (assuming the italians have not placed alot of troops there ofc)
Hence I said - it’s a two move for Russia unless NE or NW is flipped and if flipped by Britain - I’d say Britain is in a better position.
And now I see what is meant with the +5 including the NO.
And for why UK should take Italian Somaliland - well - it’s on the route up from South Africa. A single Russian mech inf. or similar would require the transporter to stay in place, require the transporter to be defended, tie up a Russian defensive unit worth 4 - it’s a lot of tactical movements and potential investments for a single point of IPC.
I’d say let Britain go for that point of production if at all.
I’ve often played around with Russian strategies having them push down through Middle East to tie up with Britain however, it’s not an ‘income’ trick. It’s a destroy Italy hard ‘trick’.
The income for Persia seems much better spend on Britain IMO as it can be done faster with them and still opens up a Russian route towards Iraq.