Me1945 Axis vs Alex Allies, G40 latest set-up

[Me1945]

I take 3ftr & Tac - zone is clr

[Me1945]

NCM
2inf & AA Gun  Cha > Sui
inf Mal > Shn
inf Hop > Kwe
inf  Hun > Kwe
AC, ftr & Tac sz35 > sz6
trn sz37 > sz35
Tac + 2ftr Kwa  > sz6
BB  sz21 > sz6
2DD sz42 >sz35
2sbmb  & Tac sz39 > Shn
ftr & Tac sz41 > Shn
ftr & Tac Yun > Anh
inf & art Ksu > Anh
inf Jeh > Cha
ftr Jap > sz6

Mobilization: AC sz6
                3ftr & art Jap

Income: 26 + 8 China + 1 Russia + 9 + 2 Phi + 15 islands + 5NO = 66

Me vs. Alex Japan 3.AAM

[Me1945]

I was referring to R2 transport buy, when I mentioned gambler. Please note, if I move sz110 SSs to sz125 & sz126, you will need a warship in a sz where you unload units from. Rules:
Instead, transports are not allowed to unload land units for an amphibious assault in a sea zone containing an enemy sub(s) belonging to a power with which they are at war unless at least one of his warships was also present in the sea zone at the end of the Combat Move phase.
If that rule, you missed, brakes your plans, I can accept R2 buy change. If you are aware of that, sorry

[lexgreat]

I am aware of that rule, no worries.

[lexgreat]

US 3

1. PURCHASE (73)

• AC (16)
• Fig (10)
• DD (8 )
• 3 Subs (18)
• 2 TT (14)
• Art (4)
• Inf (3)

2. COMBAT MOVES

Carolines <– Arm, Art, 2 Inf + naval units
A
Rolls: 1@4 3@3 2@2 1@1; Total Hits: 31@4: (4)3@3: (2, 3, 5)2@2: (3, 3)1@1: (3)
D
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 12@2: (5, 1)

[lexgreat]

3. NC

TT + Art, Inf SZ 86 –> SZ 68
Bomber, Tac from Midway land on Gilbert Islands , let me know if they can land there pls
Tac E-US --> SZ 101

4. MOBILIZATION

all SZ 101 or E-US

5. INCOME

52 (terr) + 20 (NO)

Any reason why you did not implement the Mongolian rule? You did attack a territory bordering Mongolia, should it not be Russian now?

Me1945Axis_vs_AlexAllies_3dU.AAM

[lexgreat]

CHINA 3

1. PURCHASE (12)

• 4 Inf (12)

2. COMBAT MOVES

Yunn <– 2 Inf, 1 Fig Sze
A
Rolls: 1@3 2@1; Total Hits: 01@3: (5)2@1: (3, 5)
D
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)

[lexgreat]

A
Rolls: 1@3 1@1; Total Hits: 11@3: (3)1@1: (2)
D
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (1)

[lexgreat]

3. NON-COMBAT MOVEMENT

8 Inf, Fig to Sik
3 Inf Kan –> Tsi

4. MOBILIZATION

4 Inf Tsi

5. INCOME

4

[lexgreat]

UK 3

1. PURCHASE

Europe (28)

• MIC (12)
• 2 Arm (12)
• 1 Mech (4)

PAcific (10)

• 3 Inf (9)
  save 1

2. COMBAT MOVES

SZ 91 <– Fleet SZ 108, Bomber, 4 Fig UK
A
Rolls: 2@4 6@3 3@2; Total Hits: 42@4: (6, 6)6@3: (5, 4, 1, 3, 2, 5)3@2: (2, 5, 4)
D
Rolls: 3@4 1@3 2@2 2@1; Total Hits: 33@4: (1, 2, 4)1@3: (6)2@2: (5, 6)2@1: (6, 5)

Iraq <-- all from TJ, 2 from C-Persia
A
Rolls: 1@4 2@3 4@2 6@1; Total Hits: 41@4: (3)2@3: (1, 4)4@2: (6, 1, 6, 6)6@1: (2, 6, 4, 1, 6, 3)
D
Rolls: 3@2; Total Hits: 13@2: (6, 4, 1)

[lexgreat]

Re OOL I am not sure what you will do, pls allocate the 4 hits.

And pls review the Mongolia situation.

[Me1945]

I take AC 2hits, 2SS.

Not sure how did you get 6@3 hits. Should be 5. Did I miss anything?

What is your concern in Mongolia? You just got 6 Russians there.

[Me1945]

>Bomber, Tac from Midway land on Gilbert Islands , let me know if they can land there pls<
Yes, they can.

Any reason why you did not implement the Mongolian rule? You did attack a territory bordering Mongolia, should it not be Russian now?
Ok, I see now. You expected me to change the map. Yes, the rule must be implemented at the end of the Japanese Combat Move. Will set Russian markers/units after Italy 3 along with moving one inf away from Nov.

Please don’t forget to check the number of your units rolling 3 @ sz91 before proceeding with the battle.

[lexgreat]

Its only 5 3s, apologies. Pls suggest your solution, happy to defer to.

[Me1945]

Leave it alone and go ahead. My logic is: the extra dice you roll is the last in the @3 list. It hit 5 and missed. Also, since we are actually dealing with the code generating random numbers, I’m sure that the fact you added an extra generation doesn’t affect the volumes of other generations. Btw, if there is another practice for solutions in such situations, pls share. Just curious how forks settle it here. Any way I am ok with this.

[lexgreat]

Thx. I will roll one less 3 in the second round.

Practically never happens in a live game as more people follow it and correct early. I think we would conclude to reroll, but given our playgroup thats not a certainty.
Note to self: Really have to concentrate more when playing PbF, even if circumstances are not ideal.

I take AC, one sub

A
Rolls: 2@4 4@3 2@2; Total Hits: 32@4: (6, 4)4@3: (1, 4, 6, 1)2@2: (5, 5)
D
Rolls: 3@4 1@3 2@2; Total Hits: 53@4: (3, 2, 1)1@3: (1)2@2: (2, 3)

[lexgreat]

lol, now I even add one roll too much for you. Not that you need ;)

I will now bring this disaster to an end, if you object with the losses I pick we redo from here and you pick yourself, ok?

A
Rolls: 1@4 4@3; Total Hits: 41@4: (4)4@3: (6, 1, 1, 2)
D
Rolls: 2@4; Total Hits: 12@4: (5, 2)

[lexgreat]

3. NON-COMBAT

Bomber SZ 91 to UK
3 Fig SZ 91 to FWA
2 Inf Tang to Rgo
Mech S-Afr to Rho
Inf C-Persia activates N-Persia
Inf Alberta –> BC
Fig, Tac Iraq --> W-India
2 Inf, Art Burma --> India
6 Inf, AA India --> W-India

4. MOBILIZATION

3 Inf India
2 Arm, Mech S-Afr
MIC C-Persia

5. INCOME

Europe: 27 (terr)
Pacific: 6 (terr)

Sorry again for the botched naval encounter. Since it turned out well for you I hope its fine.

Me1945Axis_vs_AlexAllies_3fUK.AAM

[lexgreat]

PS: I removed the inf from Nov myself, I think. Can be checked easily.

[Me1945]

CRD sz39

Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (3)