:lol: what a roll to start back up with.
alg2
Rolls: 1@1 2@2 2@3; Total Hits: 21@1: (1)2@2: (4, 6)2@3: (6, 3)
Rolls: 1@2 1@3; Total Hits: 11@2: (6)1@3: (2)
alg twlo inf
egy - 2 inf, bom vs. 2 inf
Rolls: 2@1 1@4; Total Hits: 32@1: (1, 1)1@4: (2)
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (6, 6)
not gonna lie, that one had me real worried. this one does too
ind - inf, art vs. inf
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 12@2: (3, 1)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (4)
:?
ind twol
NC
trj - bom (egy), ftr (z34), 2 inf, aa (per)
z13 - des, cru, bat, acc (z7), ftr (alg)
z55 - trn (z43)
mex - inf (wus), arm (wca)
cng - 2 inf (rho)
place 3 inf, arm, ftr, bom (gbr)
place trn (z2)
collect 37, has 37
cuts out all ambiguity. had kar gone horribly, you would not want those tanks in bst. so for the sake of cutting out all possible issues, i go with combat moves as typed, including walkins, sbrs, and autokills of transports
from the previous post - “I always prefer to stick to combat moves exactly as typed”. again, i was talking about combat moves only here.
so what i was saying here is, imagine that attack in kar goes completely sideways - you get 3 of 4 planes shot down and you hit me like once in the whole battle. in a case like that, you may not want 4 tanks sitting in bst where i could attack with the karelia stack.
not trying to belabor the point, just wanting to make sure all is now as clear as possible.
thanks
that was the point i was trying to make, and i’m sorry i didn’t state it very clearly.
one other thing while we are on the topic of the noncombat move. � i am NOT saying that the noncombat move post is final and i have never heard of anyone even playing this way. � i think the noncombat move is often revised slightly after the inital post, often several times. � i am fine with this, and in fact, i do not mind if it’s even done a day or two later, as long as I have not posted a dice roll on my next turn. � i am NOT ok with it being revised AFTER i have started rolling on my turn.
I agree with you and to make sure we are seeing it the same way…
1. Noncom moves can be changed anytime as long as the next turn has not begun.
2. No changing anything after that…and the typed posts are what is ruling.
@Ol’:
one other thing while we are on the topic of the noncombat move. � i am NOT saying that the noncombat move post is final and i have never heard of anyone even playing this way. � i think the noncombat move is often revised slightly after the inital post, often several times. � i am fine with this, and in fact, i do not mind if it’s even done a day or two later, as long as I have not posted a dice roll on my next turn. � i am NOT ok with it being revised AFTER i have started rolling on my turn.
I agree with you and to make sure we are seeing it the same way…
1. Noncom moves can be changed anytime as long as the next turn has not begun.
2. No changing anything after that…and the typed posts are what is ruling.
Almost. I suggest that we do our best to compare typing with map and if we find a discrepancy we ask the other to clarify which they meant. if it isn’t caught then I would probably prefer the map to control, especially if we are using the same map. if we were not using the same map then I would say its most practical to let typing control.
Is that cool?
@Ol’:
one other thing while we are on the topic of the noncombat move. � i am NOT saying that the noncombat move post is final and i have never heard of anyone even playing this way. � i think the noncombat move is often revised slightly after the inital post, often several times. � i am fine with this, and in fact, i do not mind if it’s even done a day or two later, as long as I have not posted a dice roll on my next turn. � i am NOT ok with it being revised AFTER i have started rolling on my turn.
I agree with you and to make sure we are seeing it the same way…
1. Noncom moves can be changed anytime as long as the next turn has not begun.
2. No changing anything after that…and the typed posts are what is ruling.Almost. I suggest that we do our best to compare typing with map and if we find a discrepancy we ask the other to clarify which they meant. if it isn’t caught then I would probably prefer the map to control, especially if we are using the same map. if we were not using the same map then I would say its most practical to let typing control.
Is that cool?
I am good with asking for clarification
Also, it appears the 2inf and 2art were not place in Japan like I posted for mobilizing troops.
Ita3-Buy: 5 inf…save 0
CM
1. inf art Lib => Egy 2inf
2. inf art Ita/cru bb sz14 => Trj 2inf ftr bmr
Trj
A-inf art cru bb
Rolls: 2@2 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 32@2: (1, 5)1@3: (1)1@4: (2)
D-bmr 2inf ftr
Rolls: 1@1 2@2 1@4; Total Hits: 21@1: (1)2@2: (6, 3)1@4: (4)
Need casualty choices in Trj
Ugggh. well I guess I will keep the fighter :| was really hoping you only get two hits.
Regarding placement of units they should always be able to be placed, at least up to a full turn later with no consequence. if the person who bought them isn’t missing them when their turn comes around again with that power then they are so far ahead it wouldot matter if they didn’t have them!! :lol:
Regarding placement of units they should always be able to be placed, at least up to a full turn later with no consequence. if the person who bought them isn’t missing them when their turn comes around again with that power then they are so far ahead it wouldot matter if they didn’t have them!! :lol:
:lol:
Egy
A-inf art
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 12@2: (5, 1)
D-2inf
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (4, 4)
Egy
A-inf art
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (4, 6)
D-inf
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)
Egy 1st hit
A-art
Rolls: 10@2; Total Hits: 410@2: (2, 1, 3, 4, 2, 3, 5, 5, 3, 1)
D-inf
Rolls: 10@2; Total Hits: 710@2: (2, 1, 6, 2, 4, 4, 2, 2, 2, 2)
Egy hwlo 2inf
NCM
2arm Fra => Ita
cru sz14 => sz15
Mobilize
5inf in Ita
Collect: 10
USA2 - with 49 buys inf, arm, trn, 2 ftr, acc
CM
fra (aa) - sbr with 2 bom (gbr)
combat:
fra aa fire
Rolls: 2@1; Total Hits: 02@1: (6, 5)
i’ll take those again!
fra sbr dmg
Rolls: 2@6; Total Hits: 22@6: (2, 3)
