A lot of posters seemed stunned at this scenario, never scene it ever happen or even could happen. Now that I mulled it over last night and looked at the rules and so forth it is very obvious to me why no one has ever scene this scenario. Because the scenario makes no logical sense.
Italy DOW on Russia and moves in 2 tanks into Eastern Poland.
Russia is now at war with Italy and can DOW on Germany at the start of their next turn, turn 3.
Germany on Turn 3 does not DOW on Russia and just non combats into Eastern Poland.
Russia at the start of Turn 3 DOW on Germany and off we go.There is no logical reason why Russia would not DOW on Germany at the start of Turn 3, none.
Heck you could argue that it makes no logical sense that Germany did not DOW on Russia at the start of G3 since Italy brought Russia into the war and Russia WILL DOW on Germany on R3.
Hi PainState,
From my perspective, if I was planning on doing a G3 Barbarossa AND I wanted to drive towards the south, then yes, it makes sense to not DOW. My stack will be together except for the minimum required mobile units and maybe 1 AAA in Poland so Russia doesn’t attack Poland to get their NO for occupying an Axis territory. But E. Poland will be real strong because the German air will be there and maybe bombers will also be in range of a raid on the Moscow factory. Also, 5 IPCs is more income than I’d probably get as Germany on the 1st turn.
There are a few disadvantages of course. 1, Russian blockers can’t be attacked. 2, the Scandinavian units are behind. But for me that’s ok, I just use them to lay siege anyways. I never expect to get Moscow on turn 6 anymore. I assume that the UK/Anzac and that lone French fighter are going to get to Moscow.Â
Leaving Bulgaria for Italy?
-
I don’t think Russians would counterattack Leningrad if the only thing there is there is 3-4 units, mostly mech infantry.
Ah I see. I wasn’t sure how large of a force you meant.
In that case, as Russia I would attack it.
4 Infantry + planes will take it back without losing much of anything to the counter attack. I’d be happy to trade Russian infantry for German mechs. The remaining force from Belarus would most likely go to Bryansk to defend the northern and southern routes.If the remainder of your army is split at all between Baltic States and East Poland, I’d attack the East Poland stack and retreat to West Ukraine. Stripping your army of a good chunk of its infantry would be a nice opportunity.
-
Yes, you are correct that a force of 4 mechanized infantry would present a good counter-attack opportunity (provided that planes are not needed anywhere else).
A greater force or a AA Gun dropped in the non-combat phase could change that, but pretty tricky to pull off the right balance.
Too big of a force gives rise to possibility for an attack with retreat.
In the end, really depends what’s in Leningrad at the time where it would come under attack.
I need to put units on the board and try this (with various dosage of mech infantry) to see what’s going on.
7 mech = 1 transport + 7 infantry…
-
nothing wrong with giving the italians a little more power on the eastern front,but I don’t think I would use the bulgarians
they should probably be germanized
kinda depends on uk
if they pull back to the home islands you should be able to buy a couple mechs to go with your armour maybe an inf or two that survives greece
but like alsch says you don’t really need to can open but one space allowing the germans to move their air power with their troops
even a few italians can make a difference
I like to have a small force if I can -
Thanks for everyone’s thought on this.
Looks like consensus is leaving Bulgaria to Germany and try to bring a small mechanized Italan force for limited can opening.
-
I like to strafe because germany has to move toward russia. italy should hammer out the pro allies neutrals, but bulgaria I like to be german. The rest I strafe if I can.
you only need 2 italy tanks to can opener for germany.
-
@Cow:
you only need 2 italy tanks to can opener for germany.
I disagree. As Russia some people put 2-3 or even 5 infantry to stop can opening from a small force.
Example: I am Russia and I have 3 infantry on defense and you Cow have 2 tanks.Let’s use ll rules
R1
2 tanks with 3 hit for a total of 6 and u get one hit
3 inf with 2 hit for a total of 6 I get one hit1 tank v 2 inf
R2
1 tank no hits
2 inf no hitsR3
1 tank 1 hit
2 inf 1 hit1 inf no tanks - Russia wins
As you see in my lazy example 2 tanks alone can’t canopen
-
Germany will net gain every time the Soviets block Italian can-opening in such a way because it can send fewer attacking infantry (compared to Soviet defenders) + planes. So even the threat of can-opening is useful on the Eastern front.
Better yet if the Soviets have to block more than one territory.
-
well forcing a guy to use 3 inf to block, is better than 1 inf. He has to pay the cost of doing business. Plus I rather a bigger german stack for the battle that matters.
-
This has been stated before:
If Russia blocks a 2 tank+ Italian can-opening threat in every territory, it will lose way too much to the Germans.
-
A fairly common move is for Germany to strafe Yugoslavia with units from South Germany and Romania and then retreat to Romania. Has anyone tried doing the same thing but with Italy, using units from Northern Italy and Albania strafing yugo to retreat to Albania?
With Bulgaria activated by Italy and those artillery units retreated to Albania, Italy should be able to easily wrap up Yugoslavia and Greece on round 2. That allows Germany to proceed with Barbarossa earlier instead of mucking around down in Greece.
-
Which would’ve helped IRL…
Anyways, I’m going to try to do something different today: G1 Barbarossa. But still I’m taking Bul.





