So sad. :(
You are president…or P.M.
-
Human error. The new nuclear power plants will probably be run by computers, but who runs those computers? Humans? Most likely. Computers can’t be run by computers, which in turn are run by computers. Eventually, there is a human involved and there is the risk of disaster.
Ideas are far more powerful than guns. We dont allow our enemies to have guns, why should we allow them to have ideas?–Joseph Stalin
If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.–George Orwe
[ This Message was edited by: Disclaimer on 2002-05-14 16:48 ]
-
There are literally hundreds of safeguards in a nuclear power plant. If you wanted to overheat the reactor, you probably couldn’t.
Computers can run computers easily if everything is standardized.
-
On 2002-05-10 15:10, Disclaimer wrote:
As for myself being president, I don’t think I would be able to handle the job because I would crack under the power.
You’re also too honest. (Which is a good thing)
-
Thanks yourbuttocks, I’ll work on my lying for you.
-
On 2002-05-14 18:58, Yanny wrote:
There are literally hundreds of safeguards in a nuclear power plant. If you wanted to overheat the reactor, you probably couldn’t.Computers can run computers easily if everything is standardized.
If anyone wanted to cause another nuclear disaster by any means, then it can be done. As far as everything being controlled by computers, one could hack a system quite easily. It’s not that hard. So a computer running the nuclear reactor all of a sudden crashes, and so does the backup server. “Pop quiz hot shot,” what are you going to do?
-
Disclaimer is right, nuclear power makes up for number of enviormental problems in severity.
-
Simple, require manual control (key) to override the system. In fact, make it require 2 keys, by two high level, and high paid, officals.
-
Which in turn can be corrupted and bribed to kill thousands of innocent people by detinating a manual over-ride when it’s not needed.
-
It’s a simple saftey system, maybe we should stop going in and creating terrorism instead of stopping progress of the biggest innovation of man kind since fire?
-
We don’t create terror. it’s a combination of economic, than political factors.
-
We definatly create terror. You don’t see Terrorists coming from the poor countries of West Africa, or Southeast Asia? Terrorists only hit us from the place we are economically interested in, the Middle East?
-
Yanny. has a point, we should pull out of Saudi Arabia.
-
But who would protect our vital oil interest?
-
Oh yeah, if I was president, I would make Axis and Allies our national pastime. :smile:
-
Read the thread, our Vital oil interests have one answer, screw Oil. We need to invest in Alternative Energy.
-
I’m all in favor of alternative energy and conservation, but the problem is the amount of cost and time it would take to implement it on a nation-wide. Also, if these difficulties could be overcome, you still have to deal with the American people. Remember in April 1977, Carter called for legislation to improve energy conservation, especially by curtailing the manufacture of large, gas-guzzling automobiles. However, these proposals met a firestorm of controversy by the people. Of course you can always so into drilling into ANWAR. Expert predicts that the wealth of oil in there that can easily supply all of America’s oil needs (regularly imported from the Middle East) for the next 20-25 years.
Ha, broke 600 post. 400 more to go. :smile:
-
Actually TG, those were just the early estimates. There was actually less oil in ANWAR (btw if the rest of you don’t know, thats the Alaska site) than we thought. Currently, we are using 63% of foreign oil. ANWAR would cut it down to 61%.
Big costs? Imaging the cost when we run out of oil, or Saudi Arabia refuses to sell us any. If the American people refuse to change, you create laws to make them.
-
quote: If the American people refuse to change, you create laws to make them. - Yanny
and then the American people all get a chance to use the guns that they own when the gov’t/American army tries to enforce these laws. hooray.
-
let me rephrase that, change for the better.
-
Thanks for the input Yanny. :smile: I’ll try to change this information due to out datedness; do you know where your source is located?
Also, you can makes laws for the better, but even then that doesn’t mean the people will follow them. Remember prohibition anyone? The government should play a larger role in alternative energy development, but you can’t make people switch to something Greek overnight. Conservation is also another problem. At my school, the majority of the people are too lazy or too stupid (maybe both) to care about picking up trash and soda bottles after themselves to be deposited in the trash or recycle bins.
“Only the spirit of attack, born in a brave heart, will bring success to any fighter aircraft, no matter how highly developed it may be.” - Aldolf Galland
“The crate? The crate matters not. It is the man who pilots the create that truely counts.”[ This Message was edited by: TG Moses VI on 2002-05-20 16:35 ]
Suggested Topics
