The most effective russian players I’ve encountered are the ones that are able to build up a force that is able to threaten a counter on a german stack. If a good german player wants to go for Moscow they are able to get it, however I’ve seen plenty games where the UK/USA are putting enough pressure on the German player for him to stop just in front of Moscow. If the Russian player only has bought inf at this point there is not much of a threat for the German player to keep russia contained and slowly kill it economically. However if there is a stack of paired inf/art the pushback power is a lot bigger and thus Germany can be challenged and Russia may be able to break the German wall.
Minor Threat's Alpha+3.9 (Global 1940) COMPLETE! Setup Charts
-
Love the charts!
As a personal request, do you have plans to make a National Objective Chart where you could track NO’s with the nation indicator chips? It helps in keeping track of NO’s immensely during income collect phase.
Great work!
-
Love the charts!
As a personal request, do you have plans to make a National Objective Chart where you could track NO’s with the nation indicator chips? It helps in keeping track of NO’s immensely during income collect phase.
Great work!
Yes.
I did something similar with the alpha2 charts a year ago. And I do plan on making something similar with these charts. -
This should be stickied
-
True dat.
-
Is the link broken?
-
bump.
this should seriously be stickied
-
Bump for a sticky…
I made 3 copies and laminated each one for use at our game day yesterday. Worked perfectly. Many compliments on them.
Thanks again,
-
Thanks for the great effort and the follow through on the clean up! These are great.
Upvote for the sticky too!
-
YAY great stuff. Game is closer to being balanced.
-
thank you, they look great
-
Someone please Sticky this?!?!
-
These look absolutely gorgeous, definitely going to print out and use em. Two things I noticed though compared with the Alpha +3 setup on Larry Harris’ site:
Egypt should have 2 infantry instead of 1.
Western United States need a fighter.Thanks again.
-
BUMP
Someone please Sticky this?!?!
-
Wow!
I am using these! Thank you so much!
Edit: This should added to the pinned topics.
-
Printed and laminated! thank you very much!
-
These look absolutely gorgeous, definitely going to print out and use em. Two things I noticed though compared with the Alpha +3 setup on Larry Harris’ site:
Egypt should have 2 infantry instead of 1.
Western United States need a fighter.Thanks again.
Has this been fixed yet? I almost made changes my self, but the US error needed to be completely retyped… BUT GOOD FREAKING JOB MAN!!! I have sincerely missed the setup/NO flip charts! Right on!
-
These look absolutely gorgeous, definitely going to print out and use em. Two things I noticed though compared with the Alpha +3 setup on Larry Harris’ site:
Egypt should have 2 infantry instead of 1.
Western United States need a fighter.Thanks again.
Has this been fixed yet? I almost made changes my self, but the US error needed to be completely retyped… BUT GOOD FREAKING JOB MAN!!! I have sincerely missed the setup/NO flip charts! Right on!
It didn’t look like it when I just looked at the setup charts. Though these are amazing!
-
@Minor:
Update!
-2/8/2012 Adjusted Japan’s income to 26 IPCs
-2/11/2012 Updated to Alpha+3.9 (Final Version of the Charts)
-2/12/2012 Fixed US Chart to display proper ‘Victory Conditions’. Download updated file (United States) with 2012-02-12 date
-2/12/2012 Fixed spelling error with UK Chart under Canadian Income Relocation. Download updated file- United Kingdom 1.1
-2/13/2012 Fixed Japanese Battleship size to a much more consistent size. Download (optional) updated file- Japan 1.1
-2/15/2012 Updated all the charts to have more consistent unit sizes on the Unit Reference Chart. This will be the final cosmetic update! Download (optional) updated file - 1.1a [All charts]
-2/15/2012 Fixed/updated Germany’s air units to 1 tac bomber & 2 strat Bombers (in the territory of Germany) download new file 1.1a Germany
-2/16/2012 Fixed China’s “Captured Capital” paragraph. download updated file - China 1.2aI have been working on these for some time now, and they’re finally complete!
Enjoy! Â :-)http://www.mediafire.com/?7hif1zhorbz89
Settings:
Printer Color settings: I did these with RGB color setting, so they should print out slightly different with CMYK
Paper to Print these on: Photo Glossy, or Photo Paper. (if done with regular paper, or cardstock they’ll look awful)
Paper Size: Letter 8.5 x 11land units to those territories, as long as those territories have not been captured by Japan. Doing this is not considered a
provocative act against Japan. Once Britain and ANZAC are at war with Japan, they can take control of these territories in the
same way, or by recapturing them from Japan."still applies to french indo china and maybe add that to the UK India chart and Anzc chart?
i will go on linne at harris game design and check this rule with kreig and let you know asap.
thanks for the work…these look WAY freaken cool! and clean![/img][/img][/img][/img][/img][/img][/img][/img][/img]" />
-
no. the french indo china thing from the OOB rule book doesnt apply anymore. but…the 2 inf for the UK in egypt and the 1 fighter in western USA is still the latest and greatest rule set up.
-
Now he gets the attention he deserves ;)
Just 2 little questions:
Start-up ITa and USA: ON A+3 Larry only says:
North-Italy: …… 1 Bomber? = 1 Strategic or 1 Tactical
Same US: Central USA: 1 Bomber = 1 Strategic or 1 Tactical?
I thought both were Strategic, am I right?
Suggested Topics
