TheONE (allies) vs. Corriganbp (axis) - Nov 2011 A3

[TheOne]

reroll scramble you did 5@2

[TheOne]

ha nvrmind im sleepy you rolled the planes right lol.

[corriganbp]

it’s ok, I actually feel bad for you.  The dice were very kind to me that time.

[Noll]

@TheOne:

reroll scramble you did 5@2

That 5@2 is London

[TheOne]

for the second roll in SZ109 what killed your subs is what i am saying???

[corriganbp]

my subs were already dead on the first round when you had a dd there

[corriganbp]

I only rolled planes on the second round in 109.  The subs were taken out by 2 of the 4 hits on the first round.  when there is a dd present, planes can hit subs.

[TheOne]

ha i did buy a damn destroyer didnt i lmao  what i get for 4am a&a lol

[corriganbp]

I told you could sleep on it.

[TheOne]

its all good dice kick mey arse lol.  continue and post map so i can see wht im dealing with lol. ill get to russia in the morning

[corriganbp]

Germany collects 57 + 33 – CRD in 109 = 90 – CRD

CRDRolls: 2@3; Total Hits: 12@3: (2, 6)

[corriganbp]

Germany with 88 ipcs

G3.AAM

[TheOne]

moving into a pro allied is a NCM correct

[Noll]

@TheOne:

moving into a pro allied is a NCM correct

yes

[TheOne]

Not much I can do now because my American AC is in the wrong SZ. It was suppose to go up SZ102.

Russia3 up later.

[TheOne]

Will you allow the American navy to move to SZ102 for the sake of argument?

[TheOne]

russia3

DOW ON GERMANY AND ITALY!!!

buy:  arm, sub, ftr, 5 inf=37 ipcs

combat

attack: mech from SZE to HUN
attack SZ110 with 3 subs, destroyer, bomber
attack finland: 7 inf from kar, arm from nov
attack poland: 1 inf from baltic states
attack romania: 1 inf from E. poland
attack : inf from suk to sib

SZ110 scramble orders?

[corriganbp]

scramble 3 italian fighters

[corriganbp]

Order of Loss

dmg bb, dmg 1 cv, sink 1 dd, if you get 4 or 5 hits I’m really unlucky, but in that case, sink cv, and then sink the ca, it is virtually impossible that it could go beyond that point - but if it does, ask me for OOL.

land the 2 ftrs that no longer have a carrier (if necessary) on London.

[corriganbp]

@TheOne:

Will you allow the American navy to move to SZ102 for the sake of argument?

Yes, but with only 1 plane.  You can’t build a plane directly in 102.  Your build sequence and movements are putting maximum pressure on Japan and maximizing your bomber and destroyer builds.  In order to have 2 planes on the cv, you would have had to make an offsetting reduction in forces elsewhere.
If you want 2 planes on the cv in 102, you need to propose a revision of your actual builds and moves.
Also, for future reference, I might have done things differently if the cv was in 102.