So in your opinion it is all right for another culture to enjoy to throwing babbies up in the air and then catching them with bayonets?
I think if you buy into the whole relativism ideals then you would be forced to accept the German defense for the War Crimes committed during WWII. For instance let me give you an example:
During the prosecutions of German doctors involved in the death of millions of Jews and other ethnic races, one of the main defences was cultural relativism.
As impossible as it might seem, the Holocaust and the final solution were legal. According to Browder, this mass murder of millions was sanctioned by the government under Hitler’s rule. However, when the Allies broke the Nazi regime, they declared that there was a higher law: to murder, to maim, and to torture is criminal under all modern systems of law (an absolute truth?).
These defendants did not kill in hot blood, nor for personal enrichment. Some of them may be sadists who killed and tortured for sport, but they are not all perverts. They are not ignorant men. Most of them are trained physicians and some of them are distinguished scientists. Yet these defendants, all of whom were fully able to comprehend the nature of their acts, and most of whom were exceptionally qualified to form a moral and professional judgment in this respect, are responsible for wholesale murder and unspeakably cruel tortures.
The Nuremberg trials set an international precedent: War criminals, such as Hermann Goering and Rudolf Hess, were held accountable for crimes against humanity. Now do you refute or agree with his arguement?