Scramble instructions?
G40 League House Rule project
-
Karl, take Ur miss and go to some island for a week :) Without Ur laptop of course :P
-
Karl, take Ur miss and go to some island for a week :) Without Ur laptop of course :P
Sadly, I live by the words of Trotsky: “You may not be interested in A&A, but it may be interested in you….”
-
And yet another loss for me…. A fun game with Vold.
Vold (Axis) over Entek no bid no tech
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=31339.105 -
Please post the game result in the game results thread - thanks
-
Oops. I thought I did…. Wrong thread. I’ll move it over. :-D
-
Hey, Gamer, shouldn’t I get 2 points for losing to a Tier 1 instead of just the 1 you gave me? Every point counts, after all. ;)
-
Yes, my mistake - it’s now corrected
I must have got confused because I still had you as a 2 and you were temporarily above Wheatbeer, who I had as a 1. You guys are both close to the border line…
Thanks for letting him win :wink: -
LOL you’re welcome… his victory preserved the law and order of Gamer’s ranking universe! :D
-
Right :-)
-
If Snake11eyes is bumped up to 1 tier, which he perhaps will be with his 3.5 PPG, there will be a lot of movement on top.
Gamerman01 will move to 3rd with a 4,45 PPG
Alexgreat will be at a 4,38 PPG, which means he’ll move to 4th over Ziggurat!
Hank will move past Zhukov at a 4,29 PPG
Stalingradski will move to a 3,78 PPG
Wheatbeer will move to a 3,66 PPGThere are other movements as well, but I only did the top tier!
-
I appreciate the interest
I normally wait for a player to cross into the next tier a bit so I don’t have to switch them back and forth as often if they win and lose back and forthAnyway, Snake needs to prove himself a bit more, because while he very consistently beats weaker players, he does not currently have a winning record against a single tier 1 player.
I am pleased to see his huge rise up the rankings over the past few months. I was one of the first to play him, in late February. I was pretty sure he showed a lot of promise, and I told him so. He made a lot of good decisions in our games. So I’m pleased to see that I was right about him :-) And that I didn’t get snake-bit! :-D
-
Since snake has only been defeated by tier 1 players so far, I wager than he’ll make it :-)
-
*that
-
Yes, should be just a matter of time. Plus, I think he’s improved rapidly as he’s moved along the learning curve, so another result or two and he’ll probably be in the club :-)
-
Looking briefly at the R7 map between RGP and Snake, it looks like a contested game, and Snake’s last post was July 22.
I’m going to wait a bit before I count it in my rankings…
RGP appears to be entitled to a league win according to league rule #5.
I will note it at the bottom for now -
To count it as a league win due to delay, it has to be posted to my inbox and/or to the league results thread.
-
I decided it’s time to count RGP over Snake in the rankings -
I only hesitated to count it before because it looked like he had barely timed out and he had been pretty active for several monthsAnyway, doesn’t matter, I’m counting it now
-
Man, it looks like I’m right where I belong in the rankings. I’ve won only a single game against players ranked higher than me and have conversely only lost a single game against players ranked lower.
-
@seththenewb:
Man, it looks like I’m right where I belong in the rankings. I’ve won only a single game against players ranked higher than me and have conversely only lost a single game against players ranked lower.
I appreciate the observation -
I actually have noticed that this is quite true of several other players as wellIt’s amazing how well it works, considering it’s pretty simple
-
I count 346 results where a higher ranked player won over a lower one, compared to 73 losses
That’s .826, or nearly 5/6 of the games.
You could say that on average, a higher ranked player will beat a lower one 5/6 of the time.
Seems the rankings are very accurate! Who needs ELO?! :-)
Suggested Topics
