Game History
Round: 2 Research Technology - Germans Purchase Units - Germans Germans buy 1 carrier, 1 fighter and 6 transports; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Combat Move - Germans 1 unit repaired. 2 bombers moved from Western Germany to United Kingdom 1 tactical_bomber moved from Western Germany to 104 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 110 Sea Zone to 104 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from 112 Sea Zone to 104 Sea Zone 1 tactical_bomber moved from Western Germany to 118 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from 112 Sea Zone to 118 Sea Zone 3 submarines moved from 112 Sea Zone to 118 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Holland Belgium to Normandy Bordeaux 2 mech_infantrys moved from France to Normandy Bordeaux 2 armour moved from France to Normandy Bordeaux 1 armour moved from France to Normandy Bordeaux 1 armour moved from France to Normandy Bordeaux 2 infantry moved from Norway to 112 Sea Zone 2 infantry and 1 transport moved from 112 Sea Zone to 119 Sea Zone 2 infantry moved from 119 Sea Zone to Scotland Combat - Germans Air Battle in United Kingdom Germans attacks with 2 units heading to United Kingdom Air Battle is over, the remaining bombers go on to their targets Strategic bombing raid in United Kingdom Bombing raid in United Kingdom rolls: 3,8 and causes: 11 damage to unit: factory_major Bombing raid in United Kingdom causes 11 damage total. Battle in Scotland Battle in Normandy Bordeaux Germans attack with 4 armour, 1 infantry and 2 mech_infantrys French defend with 1 artillery, 1 factory_minor, 1 harbour and 1 infantry Germans win, taking Scotland from British, taking Normandy Bordeaux from French with 4 armour and 2 mech_infantrys remaining. Battle score for attacker is 4 Casualties for Germans: 1 infantry Casualties for French: 1 artillery and 1 infantry Battle in 118 Sea Zone Germans attack with 1 fighter, 3 submarines and 1 tactical_bomber British defend with 1 battleship, 1 cruiser and 1 destroyer Germans win with 1 fighter, 1 submarine and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 28 Casualties for Germans: 2 submarines Casualties for British: 1 battleship, 1 cruiser and 1 destroyer Battle in 104 Sea Zone Germans attack with 1 fighter, 1 submarine and 1 tactical_bomber British defend with 1 destroyer Germans win with 1 fighter, 1 submarine and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 8 Casualties for British: 1 destroyer Cleaning up after air battles Non Combat Move - Germans 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from 104 Sea Zone to 112 Sea Zone 1 cruiser moved from 112 Sea Zone to 119 Sea Zone 1 carrier moved from 112 Sea Zone to 119 Sea Zone 1 battleship moved from 112 Sea Zone to 119 Sea Zone 1 destroyer moved from 112 Sea Zone to 119 Sea Zone 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from 118 Sea Zone to 119 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from Southern Italy to Western Germany 1 infantry moved from Western Germany to Holland Belgium 2 armour moved from France to Holland Belgium 1 aaGun moved from Western Germany to Holland Belgium 1 aaGun moved from Germany to Western Germany 1 aaGun moved from Poland to Germany 2 infantry moved from Slovakia Hungary to Germany 3 artilleries and 11 infantry moved from Germany to Western Germany 1 infantry moved from Romania to Slovakia Hungary 5 infantry moved from Bulgaria to Romania 2 infantry moved from Yugoslavia to Slovakia Hungary 3 armour moved from Yugoslavia to Western Germany 1 artillery moved from France to Western Germany 3 infantry moved from Finland to Norway 2 bombers moved from United Kingdom to Western Germany 1 infantry moved from Western Germany to Holland Belgium 1 infantry moved from Poland to Germany 1 infantry moved from Finland to Norway 1 infantry moved from Poland to Germany Place Units - Germans 1 carrier and 6 transports placed in 112 Sea Zone 1 fighter placed in Western Germany Turn Complete - Germans Germans collect 43 PUs; end with 43 PUs Trigger Germans 5 Swedish Iron Ore: Germans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 48 PUs Objective Germans 1 Trade with Russia: Germans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 53 PUsG40 League House Rule project
-
Ah 44 games under the belt…. no one even close yet… :mrgreen:
I should get a special prize :-D
:?
I thought you had 45. 46 if you count the one with TyzoqYou’d better double check the status of your marriage, you lout :lol:
-
Guess my average bid this year has been 36 IPC this year for allies. (48+48+12) with 1 loss and 2 games in progress. That help ya Amon-Sul?
-
Ah 44 games under the belt…. no one even close yet… :mrgreen:
I should get a special prize :-D
:?
I thought you had 45. 46 if you count the one with TyzoqYou’d better double check the status of your marriage, you lout :lol:
45 yes
-
@Cmdr:
Guess my average bid this year has been 36 IPC this year for allies. (48+48+12) with 1 loss and 2 games in progress. That help ya Amon-Sul?
You have played as many games as Karl plays in one week . :D
-
Do U have some data about an average bid of the 2013 league so far?
And data about average Allied winning bid of the 2013 league?
thanks :)
I have not been tracking bids this year under the assumption that most players are not very experienced and don’t really know what they’re doing, anyway.
I think most bids I’ve noticed range from 5 to 14, with 9-12 being most common.
Sorry, no data on bid amounts.
And what about Axis vs Allies ? Which side is better so far?
-
You can look at the right side of my rankings spreadsheet and decide for yourself
I think you will find that there are about 6 players who have had much more success with the Axis than the Allies.
Many players have a similar record and/or win % with Axis and Allies.
Many players just plain prefer taking one of the two sides (I take the Allies) much more than the other.I think Allies have won at least half of the games in the league in the past couple of months. I think that as people get more experience with the game, the Allies will have more success, because I think it’s easier to play effectively with the Axis than the Allies, for most players, especially if they don’t have a lot of experience.
-
Do U have some data about an average bid of the 2013 league so far?
And data about average Allied winning bid of the 2013 league?
thanks :)
I have not been tracking bids this year under the assumption that most players are not very experienced and don’t really know what they’re doing, anyway.
I think most bids I’ve noticed range from 5 to 14, with 9-12 being most common.
Sorry, no data on bid amounts.
And what about Axis vs Allies ? Which side is better so far?
Ah, the eternal question….
I have myself seesawed on this quit a bit… at first it was the Axis then maybe the allies having the advantage.
BUT, all that being said, I think the caliber of the player and luck factor more than which side is being played. A good player with the Axis that gets good luck at the start is almost unstoppable. A good player that gets bad luck with the Axis is quit stoppable, unless his opponent is a weaker player and then the Axis player can maybe pull it off.
-
Yep
The fact that people are bidding between about 5 and 12 IPC’s and the fact that we have a 55% Axis win pct and 45% Allies tells me that this game is actually pretty fair… So you should take whichever side you think you can do better with. If you bid to determine who takes which side, both players should be satisfied…
-
Yep
The fact that people are bidding between about 5 and 12 IPC’s and the fact that we have a 55% Axis win pct and 45% Allies tells me that this game is actually pretty fair… So you should take whichever side you think you can do better with. If you bid to determine who takes which side, both players should be satisfied…
If you also consider the amount of units and spaces on the board compared to classic, you might reach the conclusion that this game is pretty well balanced really. What’s 12 IPC on a board with hundreds and hundreds of IPCs for each side and significantly more territories to deal with compared to the equivalent we were bidding in Classic?
-
Exactly. This is probably the most balanced A&A game ever made :-o
Maybe it’s BECAUSE it’s a much bigger map? Anyway, it is quite well balanced.
-
Exactly. This is probably the most balanced A&A game ever made :-o
Maybe it’s BECAUSE it’s a much bigger map? Anyway, it is quite well balanced.
The number of units, nations, territories, IPCs…
Many types of units, scramble, harbours, airfields, major and minor ICs, major ICs becoming minor when U capture enemy territory…
The game is phenomenal… Now almost every part of the map is important. No more ignore zones.
This game sometimes reminds me on chess :D
Definitely the best AA game so far and the game in which quality desides much more then it ever did, on the long run luck cant help U, only game knowledge, tactics, strategies, exp and being one or move moves in front of your opponent.
Not to mention tacticising about the sides and the bid affcorse. This is truly a great game.
I am happy that triple a which i play from the beginning with evolved so much. I hope Veqryn can fix those few things more and make it a ˝perfect thing˝.
I am looking forward to play offs and some tournament even as a viewer, i love this game :) 8-)
-
Well said, Amon
-
This game sometimes reminds me on chess :D
yes, I’ve been saying this for years… (well, I guess 2 years…)
-
Chess with dice
-
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhOB4pSke42ydEhlX0RfbGxmM3RMSHJQd083TV9JUGc#gid=0
Congratulations to Amon Sul and Wheatbeer for rising to the next tier
Everyone who has played Amon Sul and/or Wheatbeer in the past has been awarded 1 more point for each game played against them to reflect the quality of those wins/losses
-
Chess with dice
In the middle as we say here in Croatia. Exactly, it is in two short words. :-)
-
Interesting -
I wish I knew what you meant there….
Can you say it another way?
What do you mean by “In the middle”? -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinjska_alka
It means U scored, and U scored pretty good.
The American equivalent would be ˝bullseye˝ or ˝bingo˝…
As we have this Alka game, in which U have to hit with the spear while riding a tiny circle incide of a tiny metal object… Then we say ˝in the middle˝ . It means like bullseye hehe :D
But it does not apply only to sport subjects but to all hehe :)
-
I’m glad I asked - because that is very interesting
Thanks for the very clear answer
-
Wowsers!
Some of our top players have been IMPROVING their PPG, and the great, inactive Zhukov is down to 5th place
A high quality win or 2 from Cow and Alex the great, (and assuming no slippage from Hank or Ziggs :lol:) and we could have SIX players above the Zhukov line :-o