G40 League House Rule project

[gamerman01]

That’s my point, Jenn
It’s ridiculous to say you have to control one.

Would make more sense to say you must control ALL Allied capitals, or all but one or something.

It would be virtually impossible to control all 3 Axis capitals for a full round and NOT control at least 2-3 of the major Allied capitals, so it’s just a silly rule.

[seth4god]

It’s kind of a superflous rule IMHO. 99% of the time the axis will surrender way before the point where they’ve lost their capitals. Usually axis players will throw in the towel once they realize that they’ve reached their high water mark and they can’t grab the VCs they need to win. They know it’s just a matter of time before the allies win.

[Jennifer]

@seththenewb:

It’s kind of a superflous rule IMHO. 99% of the time the axis will surrender way before the point where they’ve lost their capitals. Usually axis players will throw in the towel once they realize that they’ve reached their high water mark and they can’t grab the VCs they need to win. They know it’s just a matter of time before the allies win.

If my opponent made me mad, I’ll sometimes require him to WIN before I give up the game.  So it MAY come into effect, but honestly, even then, it’s “fine, you have Berlin” or “okay, well you have Tokyo so…”  never all 3.

[gamerman01]

Right - effectively the object of the game for the Allies is to DENY the 8/6 victory cities.

If they achieve that, they’ve won, because of course if the Axis don’t win…. the Allies do.

[gamerman01]

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhOB4pSke42ydEhlX0RfbGxmM3RMSHJQd083TV9JUGc#gid=0

This is the link to the on-line rankings spreadsheet
See where you stack up against the other 50 league players in the 2013 league
See first 2 posts in this thread for explanations/details.

Reminder to players to go back and look at the first post in the G40 league thread for the league rules.
One thing that has changed since then is the # of games required to make the playoffs, and how many players will participate in the playoffs, but it will still go purely by win % - that has not been changed.

[gamerman01]

Main change since the start of the year -

There are 4 tiers now and not 3.
You get 6 points for beating a tier 1, 5 for tier 2, 4 for tier 3, and 3 for tier 4
You get 2 points for losing against a tier 1, 1 for tier 2, and 0 for tier 3 or 4

Generally, cutoffs between tiers are 3.5 PPG for tier 1
2.5 PPG for tier 2
1.5 PPG for tier 3

Axis vs. Allied results are tracked at the far right, by player, by tier, and in total for all 2013 league games.

[Amon-Sul]

@Gamerman01:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhOB4pSke42ydEhlX0RfbGxmM3RMSHJQd083TV9JUGc#gid=0

This is the link to the on-line rankings spreadsheet
See where you stack up against the other 50 league players in the 2013 league
See first 2 posts in this thread for explanations/details.

Reminder to players to go back and look at the first post in the G40 league thread for the league rules.
One thing that has changed since then is the # of games required to make the playoffs, and how many players will participate in the playoffs, but it will still go purely by win % - that has not been changed.

13 games?
8 players in playoff?

What in the case that 2 guys have the same win percentage, and the same score too for example 25-12?

[Jennifer]

@Amon-Sul:

@Gamerman01:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhOB4pSke42ydEhlX0RfbGxmM3RMSHJQd083TV9JUGc#gid=0

This is the link to the on-line rankings spreadsheet
See where you stack up against the other 50 league players in the 2013 league
See first 2 posts in this thread for explanations/details.

Reminder to players to go back and look at the first post in the G40 league thread for the league rules.
One thing that has changed since then is the # of games required to make the playoffs, and how many players will participate in the playoffs, but it will still go purely by win % - that has not been changed.

13 games?
8 players in playoff?

What in the case that 2 guys have the same win percentage, and the same score too for example 25-12?

1. You need to meet the required number of games to qualify.
2. Best win percentages will play in the playoffs (not sure on number of brackets right now.)
3. In the case of a tie, for a playoff spot, the player with more games will continue over the player with fewer games.  So if Player A had 50 games and a percentage of 98% and Player B had 25 games and a percentage of 98%, then player A would take priority for the playoffs over player B.

[Amon-Sul]

@Cmdr:

@Amon-Sul:

@Gamerman01:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhOB4pSke42ydEhlX0RfbGxmM3RMSHJQd083TV9JUGc#gid=0

This is the link to the on-line rankings spreadsheet
See where you stack up against the other 50 league players in the 2013 league
See first 2 posts in this thread for explanations/details.

Reminder to players to go back and look at the first post in the G40 league thread for the league rules.
One thing that has changed since then is the # of games required to make the playoffs, and how many players will participate in the playoffs, but it will still go purely by win % - that has not been changed.

13 games?
8 players in playoff?

What in the case that 2 guys have the same win percentage, and the same score too for example 25-12?

1. You need to meet the required number of games to qualify.
2. Best win percentages will play in the playoffs (not sure on number of brackets right now.)
3. In the case of a tie, for a playoff spot, the player with more games will continue over the player with fewer games.  So if Player A had 50 games and a percentage of 98% and Player B had 25 games and a percentage of 98%, then player A would take priority for the playoffs over player B.

1)And taht number is ? 13 games against 7 players?

2)Around which number are U? is it 4, 8 or 16?

3)What if both have 50 games and 98 % ?

[Jennifer]

1. Yes, currently 13 games against at least 7 different players.  We can change it next year, but really, it’s only designed to stop people from having 3 or 4 wins and having 100% win/loss records.
2. ATM, looking at the top 8 players for playoffs.  I want to minimize the time playoffs run into next season if at all possible!
3. I’ll cross that bridge when I come to it.  ATM, I am thinking in that case I would look at how they faired playing each other and the won who won the most against the other would move on.  If they never played each other, I’d look for the best player they both played and the won who did the best against him (her) would move on.  I’ll figure something out that’s fair if this becomes an issue.

[Amon-Sul]

@Cmdr:

1. Yes, currently 13 games against at least 7 different players.   We can change it next year, but really, it’s only designed to stop people from having 3 or 4 wins and having 100% win/loss records.
2. ATM, looking at the top 8 players for playoffs.  I want to minimize the time playoffs run into next season if at all possible!
3. I’ll cross that bridge when I come to it.  ATM, I am thinking in that case I would look at how they faired playing each other and the won who won the most against the other would move on.  If they never played each other, I’d look for the best player they both played and the won who did the best against him (her) would move on.  I’ll figure something out that’s fair if this becomes an issue.

1. totally agree.

2. Great.

3. I suggest U declare this rules in case of two players being eve, now so we dont have problems later. It is better to prevent then to cure, and why wouldnt people know the detailed rules. U already more or less have answers.

4. Have U seen my post at the G 40 League topic? About playoffs? What do U think about it?

[atease]

Atease (allies +6) over PGMatt
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=30994.new#new

Well played PGMatt, a true gentleman

[atease]

@atease:

Atease (allies +6) over PGMatt
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=30994.new#new

Well played PGMatt, a true gentleman

Wrong forum. oops.

[boldfresh]

do i get credit for beating a tier 1 if i win against Jenn and her +48 bid?  :wink:

[Jennifer]

@Boldfresh:

do i get credit for beating a tier 1 if i win against Jenn and her +48 bid?   :wink:

But then I should get nothing cause you foolishly let me have a 48 IPC bid!

[boldfresh]

@Cmdr:

@Boldfresh:

do i get credit for beating a tier 1 if i win against Jenn and her +48 bid?�  � :wink:

But then I should get nothing cause you foolishly let me have a 48 IPC bid!

:-)

I think its your turn right jenn?

[seth4god]

@Boldfresh:

@Cmdr:

@Boldfresh:

do i get credit for beating a tier 1 if i win against Jenn and her +48 bid?�  � :wink:

But then I should get nothing cause you foolishly let me have a 48 IPC bid!

:-)

I think its your turn right jenn?

I think it’s your turn in OUR game.  :-P

[boldfresh]

Seth why dont u just give up?  :wink:

[boldfresh]

The games move down the list so fast I lose track of them!  Wish there was a feature where u could be shown just your active threads.

[seth4god]

Because I’m winning   :roll: