Game History
Round: 1 Purchase Units - Germans Germans buy 1 carrier, 1 destroyer and 1 submarine; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Trigger Germans 6 Atlantic Wall Broken Switch: Setting switch to false for conditionAttachment_Germans_6_Atlantic_Wall_Possible_Switch attached to Germans Combat Move - Germans 1 armour, 1 artillery and 2 infantry moved from Holland Belgium to Normandy Bordeaux 1 mech_infantry moved from Western Germany to Normandy Bordeaux 3 armour and 3 mech_infantrys moved from Austria to France 1 artillery, 3 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from Western Germany to France 2 armour, 1 artillery and 3 infantry moved from Holland Belgium to France 1 fighter moved from Norway to 114 Sea Zone 1 tactical_bomber moved from Germany to 114 Sea Zone 1 battleship moved from 116 Sea Zone to 114 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from Germany to 114 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 127 Sea Zone to 114 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 121 Sea Zone to 114 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 120 Sea Zone to 109 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 111 Sea Zone to 109 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 111 Sea Zone to 113 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 106 Sea Zone to 113 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from Germany to 113 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from Holland Belgium to 113 Sea Zone 2 fighters and 4 tactical_bombers moved from Western Germany to 113 Sea Zone 2 artilleries and 6 infantry moved from Austria to Yugoslavia 1 armour and 2 infantry moved from Slovakia Hungary to Yugoslavia 1 armour and 1 infantry moved from Romania to Yugoslavia 1 armour and 1 fighter moved from Poland to Yugoslavia Combat - Germans Battle in Yugoslavia Germans attack with 3 armour, 2 artilleries, 1 fighter and 9 infantry Neutral_Allies defend with 5 infantry Germans win, taking Yugoslavia from Neutral_Allies with 3 armour, 2 artilleries, 1 fighter and 9 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 15 Casualties for Neutral_Allies: 5 infantry Battle in Normandy Bordeaux Germans attack with 1 armour, 1 artillery, 2 infantry and 1 mech_infantry French defend with 1 artillery, 1 factory_minor, 1 harbour and 1 infantry Germans win, taking Normandy Bordeaux from French with 1 armour, 1 artillery, 2 infantry and 1 mech_infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 7 Casualties for French: 1 artillery and 1 infantry Battle in 114 Sea Zone Germans attack with 1 battleship, 1 bomber, 1 fighter, 2 submarines and 1 tactical_bomber British defend with 1 battleship, 1 cruiser and 1 destroyer Units damaged: 1 battleship owned by the British Units damaged: 1 battleship owned by the Germans Germans win with 1 battleship, 1 bomber, 1 fighter, 1 submarine and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 31 Casualties for Germans: 1 submarine Casualties for British: 1 battleship, 1 cruiser and 1 destroyer Battle in 109 Sea Zone Germans attack with 2 submarines British defend with 1 destroyer and 1 transport Germans win, taking 109 Sea Zone from Neutral with 2 submarines remaining. Battle score for attacker is 14 Casualties for British: 1 destroyer and 1 transport Battle in 113 Sea Zone Germans attack with 1 bomber, 3 fighters, 2 submarines and 4 tactical_bombers British defend with 1 battleship and 1 cruiser; French defend with 1 cruiser Units damaged: 1 battleship owned by the British Germans win with 1 bomber, 3 fighters and 3 tactical_bombers remaining. Battle score for attacker is 18 Casualties for Germans: 2 submarines and 1 tactical_bomber Casualties for French: 1 cruiser Casualties for British: 1 battleship and 1 cruiser Battle in France Germans attack with 5 armour, 2 artilleries, 6 infantry and 4 mech_infantrys British defend with 1 armour and 1 artillery; French defend with 1 aaGun, 1 airfield, 1 armour, 1 artillery, 1 factory_major, 1 fighter and 6 infantry Germans captures 19PUs while taking French capital Germans converts factory_major into different units Germans win, taking France from French with 5 armour and 4 mech_infantrys remaining. Battle score for attacker is 27 Casualties for Germans: 2 artilleries and 6 infantry Casualties for French: 1 aaGun, 1 armour, 1 artillery, 1 fighter and 6 infantry Casualties for British: 1 armour and 1 artillery Trigger Germans Conquer France: Setting switch to true for conditionAttachment_French_1_Liberation_Switch attached to French triggerFrenchDestroyPUsGermans: Setting destroysPUs to true for playerAttachment attached to French Non Combat Move - Germans 1 cruiser and 1 transport moved from 117 Sea Zone to 115 Sea Zone 3 infantry moved from Norway to Finland Germans take Finland from Neutral_Axis 2 infantry moved from Denmark to 115 Sea Zone 2 infantry moved from 115 Sea Zone to Norway 1 aaGun, 3 artilleries and 11 infantry moved from Germany to Poland 1 infantry moved from Romania to Bulgaria Germans take Bulgaria from Neutral_Axis 1 fighter moved from Yugoslavia to Southern Italy 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from 114 Sea Zone to 115 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from 114 Sea Zone to Western Germany 1 bomber, 3 fighters and 3 tactical_bombers moved from 113 Sea Zone to Western Germany 1 aaGun moved from Germany to Slovakia Hungary 1 aaGun moved from Holland Belgium to Normandy Bordeaux 1 aaGun moved from Western Germany to Holland Belgium Place Units - Germans 1 carrier, 1 destroyer and 1 submarine placed in 115 Sea Zone Turning on Edit Mode EDIT: Removing units owned by Germans from 114 Sea Zone: 1 submarine EDIT: Removing units owned by Germans from 114 Sea Zone: 1 battleship EDIT: Adding units owned by Germans to 115 Sea Zone: 1 battleship EDIT: Changing unit hit damage for these Germans owned units to: battleship = 1 EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode Turn Complete - Germans Germans collect 41 PUs; end with 60 PUs Trigger Germans 5 Swedish Iron Ore: Germans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 65 PUs Objective Germans 1 Trade with Russia: Germans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 70 PUsG40 League House Rule project
-
My evidence:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZOG
as for ZOQ suffix – not such entry… go figure.
Long live Tyzoq!!! :mrgreen:
-
Updated with the new Jenn ruling that best of FIVE is now allowed,
only for players who have played 12 games vs. at least 6 different opponents alreadyThose eligible players are now colored in pale blue
Let the revenge games commence!!!
We have SEVENTEEN players already meeting this criteria!
-
We have SEVENTEEN players already meeting this criteria!
Considering the turn out last year, this statement really scares me about next year!
-
Your fright is well-founded.
I haven’t been formally tracking, but I am sure that activity has been increasing month by month. There have been days recently with 3 completed games in a single day, and I’ve been seeing new names popping up in league play lately.Unfortunately, we have lost some who have played like mad men for a few months and then they get burned out. Hopefully several of them will come back, but yeah…. the vast majority of those 17 players are active right now.
-
ugh… OK Bold… you want to kill me? :oops:
-
ugh… OK Bold… you want to kill me? :oops:
yes, Karl, I would be delighted to kill you. would you please start the bidding?
-
Updated
-
Updated
-
Updated
-
It has come to my attention that last one wasn’t updated
I maybe forgot to click save first or somethingHere
-
Updated
Don’t fret, Hank. 4.00 is straight A’s!
Thanks for validating my confidence that you would stay in tier 1, Wheat. Sounds and looks like you are a fearsome Axis specialist.
Don’t think your Allies are unbeatable until you’ve played Wheatbeer a couple times, gents. -
Five results in today and where I live there are still a couple hours left!
Anybody else wanna resign?! :lol:
-
Updated
Hank climbs to 6th and Stalingradski temporarily dips out of the top 10 - but barely out
-
Updated
-
22 downloads in less than 48 hours? Wow
Change in my unofficial policy, dudes.
Since my ranking system is not and has never been official, it does not have to perfectly follow league rules. After all, the whole PPG, point system, and assigning ranking numbers (also minimum # of games played) are all according to my prerogative.So here’s the deal.
Although Jenn has been very reasonable in allowing best of 5 between 2 players, I want to take this a couple steps further.
I saw a recent result where 2 gents had played best of 3, and they wanted to play again. HOWEVER, only one of them had the requisite 13 games finished.
It ought not be that way. Therefore:There is now hereby NO LIMITATION on how many games you can play against any one given player. I will track them all. If at the end of the year you have played 13 or more games etc etc, I’m sure best of 5 will count against other players who have also played 13 or more games, and I will continue to track this in blue.
I have already set precedent for my rankings being slightly different than the official league standings, which it sounds like won’t be tabulated until toward the end of the year. As you know, when someone claims a win after their opponent disappears after barely playing, I have not counted that in my ranking systems, but they do count as official league results.
So again, I am counting ANY AND ALL games in my ranking system, but if you play extra games that are non-official, they just will not help you in the official league standings at the end of the year and will not get you into the playoffs. I may or may not keep track of WHICH games are “excess” - I probably will.
I suspect that there are MANY GOOD GAMES that have NOT been played because of this restrictive league rule, and that goes against the spirit of the league.
Well, actually I am going to have a cap, but it’s going to be much higher. Like best of 11. We don’t want too much of buddies playing each other constantly and nobody else, after all. But best of 5 is too restrictive also, and best of 3 has been a near tragedy.
Clear? Any questions?
-
Let me clarify a little more:
Even if you have played 12 or less games so far, you can go ahead and play somebody when one of you already has 2 wins. I will count it just like normal.
If by the end of the year you have 13 or more games played against the minimum 5 or 6 different players or whatever, I think up to best of 5 will end up counting officially.
But since my spreadsheet is virtually the only record of league games in existence and I’m sharing it with everyone, and because it has no effect on the playoffs and is not considered official (nobody’s getting named champion or getting any awards as a result of the decisions I make or the spreadsheet I’ve developed), I’m thinking why be held back by the # of games that will be officially counted by Jennifer?
Best of 3 is a freaking “mini” series. You find out you like playing somebody and you have hot games that could go either way and you’re having a good time? Best of 5 isn’t enough either!
GAME ON!! says the gamerman
-
How does the playoffs work? Is it top seed vs bottom seed, 2nd top vs 2nd bottom…
is there a link to the playoff rules?
Cheers,
-
Let me clarify,
Last YEAR we had 35 games in AAG40 league. Â This year we have over 245 games. Â It’s a different year and I never would have expected to see an increase of that much in 6 months. Â (Yea, that’s right, I am now projecting over 500 games this year!)
Like others, I don’t want to see someone sitting there with 4 games all wins and go to the playoffs. Â
In the league discussion thread, I am floating the possibility of increasing the number of games to some arbitrary number. Â Feel free to go there and comment.
As for my “activity” of late, I was in the hospital for most of January, February and March and while I tried to get my netbook running and get in here, with all the medication and hoopla going on, I just wasn’t able too. Â So no, I do not CURRENTLY have a record of who played whom yet, however it’s all in the league game reporting thread and I’m sure it won’t take more than, oh, a fortnight to get it tabulated myself to confirm or repudiate Gamer’s numbers.
It’s not “official” because I have not certified it. Plain and simple. Â I am not saying it is wrong, or right, although I am pretty sure it is right, he’s not one to fudge numbers.
I am getting back on my feet, have gotten so to the point I am available to play games again. Â Heck, I just got tripleA working again yesterday. lol.
Game on! Â Give me your dang feedback on # of game minimum for playoffs in the G40 league, or don’t come crying to me in November! Â
-
How does the playoffs work? Is it top seed vs bottom seed, 2nd top vs 2nd bottom…
is there a link to the playoff rules?
Cheers,
ATM best percentage of win/loss with minimum 4 games.
I am willing to raise that as high as 30 game minimum or higher (or lower.) However, I don’t want to make a loud popping sound by shifting a paradigm without a clutch this late in the season without getting player feedback. League is for the players, not the moderators/founders.
-
Let me clarify a little more:
Even if you have played 12 or less games so far, you can go ahead and play somebody when one of you already has 2 wins. I will count it just like normal.
If by the end of the year you have 13 or more games played against the minimum 5 or 6 different players or whatever, I think up to best of 5 will end up counting officially.
But since my spreadsheet is virtually the only record of league games in existence and I’m sharing it with everyone, and because it has no effect on the playoffs and is not considered official (nobody’s getting named champion or getting any awards as a result of the decisions I make or the spreadsheet I’ve developed), I’m thinking why be held back by the # of games that will be officially counted by Jennifer?
Best of 3 is a freaking “mini” series. You find out you like playing somebody and you have hot games that could go either way and you’re having a good time? Best of 5 isn’t enough either!
GAME ON!! says the gamerman
Will these 13 games all be played on the league site here?
Suggested Topics
