Ridiculous dice.
fd5d0d81-b6db-4c2b-8f96-2c495385e750-image.png
OOL?
I’ve got only 1 game going now. I will clear the decks and then start to rebuild. I think I will try to stick to 1 game at a time now. 4 or 5 games at once seems to always make me lose 2 of them… :-P
Reminds me of the episode of the Simpsons where Bart is in the park playing chess with three guys at once:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LwZTkidnN8
I couldn’t find it in English, but you’ll get the idea.
@Eggman:
I’ve got only 1 game going now. I will clear the decks and then start to rebuild. I think I will try to stick to 1 game at a time now. 4 or 5 games at once seems to always make me lose 2 of them… :-P
Reminds me of the episode of the Simpsons where Bart is in the park playing chess with three guys at once:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LwZTkidnN8
I couldn’t find it in English, but you’ll get the idea.
hilarious… i too am prone to the exhilarating experience of playing many games at the same time - but the level of my play drops precipitously. :lol:
Yeah, I think that I can probably commit to handling only 2 competitive games at a time. Problem for me is the lag time between moves. You get all deep into the strategy eyeing ever single piece and move and then a couple days go by and you not only forget what was going on but start confusing it with another game.
BTW I played a live game last Saturday with about 5 other players… OH MAN! Was that an interesting experience… As the US I watched my Allies basically throw away the game… About Midnight, my allied players had cleared out and I did my best to right the allied cause. Sometime past 1am I think I had brought the situation under control. A much different experience than tripleA league play!
Yeah, I think that I can probably commit to handling only 2 competitive games at a time. Problem for me is the lag time between moves. You get all deep into the strategy eyeing ever single piece and move and then a couple days go by and you not only forget what was going on but start confusing it with another game.
That’s my biggest problem as well.
Hmm.
I think your biggest problem is that you’re an egg.
That last one wasn’t quite accurate…
Confusing myself doing it on two different computers
I think this one’s right. Updated with the tcnance/Eggman result.
I’m wondering if anybody is letting these rankings influence your bidding. A top guy might go with a bid of 9 - 12 if playing Allies against another top guy, but might want none at all if they want to be really fair when challenging a bottom guy (or gal… do we have any?).
It has a big influence on which side I want, and therefore what I bid, yes.
Would also be interested to hear from people on the subject
Eggman is on a ROLL!
(pun intended)
Promoted to tier 2 because he passed the -0.50 barrier, so his opponents get a raise
Keep up the good work, Egg. If you slip back to tier 3, I’m gonna fry you
If you slip back to tier 3, I’m gonna fry you
Yuk, yuk ,yuk. Or should I say, yolk, yolk, yolk
?
The latter, of course!
Updated
ooooooh cow, how the mighty have fallen so far… middle of the pack. probably about right :-P
there is a new heavy in town, and his name is ErwinRommel.
ooooooh cow, how the mighty have fallen so far… middle of the pack. probably about right :-P
Please don’t incite cow to rant and rave on this thread also. You guys have been sparring all over A&A.org for several days, now…. Is no place sacred? :lol: :wink:
Updated with AA50 results
AA50 is on the first tab - arrow to the left at the bottom left
2 Axis wins gets the 2013 results back to what I’ve seen - 62.5% winning percentage for Axis when the bid is below 12
(Actually, it was 68.1% in 2012, when 91 games were played)
Updated with G40 result
Updated with AA50 result
Shakeup at the top with the Allweneed/Tyzoq result