Here is the game, Have Fun
G40 League House Rule project
-
Sorry
Nonsense!
you had to recalculate everything (thanks for conducting the rankings) … I’ll do my best to stay in the same tier :lol:
Sounds like a plan!
In the standings you uploaded Feb. 3 both my wins against Vance were recorded, but in the new spreadsheet it only shows one match. I believe my win-loss should be an even 5-5 now.
Thanks - I will look into that.
Now if you had told me there was a loss I hadn’t recorded that would knock you down to tier 2, I wouldn’t be so enthused. :wink: -
Probably happened when I used a different computer to update it and downloaded my upload. Then here at my home computer it wasn’t saved - so that’s how it could have happened. I think there was only that one game…
I’ll check the date of your Vance win - probably the same day I was away from home.
-
your rankings rock gamer. thanks again for the efforts.
-
Anyway, I see Vance posted that Wheatbeer beat Vance (again) so that is all the evidence I need
Welcome to the .500 club! You are joining…… only Omega
You are in 9th, and only .03 PPG from 8th over a stationary Fortress (aren’t all fortresses stationary? Well, no, not B-29 Flying Fortresses!)
Oh my goodness, now I need to look up B-29’s on wikipedia.
-
your rankings rock gamer. thanks again for the efforts.
OBG sure didn’t think so! :|
Thanks, it’s a bonus that they’re appreciated - I would be keeping them for my own purposes anyway! :-D
-
your rankings rock gamer. thanks again for the efforts.
Yeah, you just passed me! :lol:
Ain’t it great that they reflect strength of schedule and even out the differences for number of games played among players? I know you were a champion for strength of schedule considerations (for good reason) a couple of years ago.
-
looking at your rankings, i just realized one of my results hadn’t been posted. so you will probably pass me right back :-P
-
Updated
-
-
And so of course we have another result with 2 hours
-
And another 2 hours later :-)
-
Extremely minor point (so small you can barely see it): there is a subtle typo in
Suprise Attack, it is supposed to be spelled without the firstr. I had never even noticed it was missing until the reason why was explained. -
Never noticed that, Eggman - you are a detailed oriented person and that will serve you very well in A&A
As a CPA, I welcome the nit-picky edits - I’m used to it :-)
Updated with a new result, too.
-
Never noticed that, Eggman - you are a detailed oriented person and that will serve you very well in A&A
Well I work in an engineering field at the moment so I spend a lot of time reviewing data sheets to make sure components are being used properly. Which also means I’m always ready to nitpick a rule on a moment’s notice…
-
Tell Wally hi for me :-)
-
If you want another odd detail, Zhukov44 is always listed as
Zhukov4in the titles of the game threads, so I couldn’t tell you how they prefer to be credited. -
@Eggman:
If you want another odd detail, Zhukov44 is always listed as
Zhukov4in the titles of the game threads, so I couldn’t tell you how they prefer to be credited.Yeah, thanks. He must have changed his name, too, because he was Zhukov44 for years
-
@Eggman:
If you want another odd detail, Zhukov44 is always listed as
Zhukov4in the titles of the game threads, so I couldn’t tell you how they prefer to be credited.- in the threads started by Zhukov44.
-
-
Yes
Suggested Topics
