Usual scramble options
7f9b31fc-73c9-4640-9273-1b26343bfc65-image.png
61af9034-0d91-44fb-bfbc-d16a41b426d9-image.png
G40 League House Rule project
-
Updated
Stats on 3rd sheet
Axis are 16-5
If you want to win, let your opponent have the bid at less than 12.
-
Results tabulated for 2011 tournament (1941)
After excluding a few games I felt were mis-matches or involved a very inexperienced player (Gargantua said it was the first time he’d played AA50), I have:
Axis - 12
Allies - 6Yoshi has been winning the semi-finals game since having a decent G1 and J1 and I suffered a disastrous R2. So it will probably be 13-6 unless he screws up (he won’t - he’s very thorough).
I only play 1941 because everybody else does. Still hate how it sets up Japan to take over half the world in only a few rounds of play.
-
-
Updated
Axis 16-7 (Latest Allied win on failed G1 dice and rep of Allied player)
-
Um - that is, the game was resigned before Russia took a turn
-
Updated
-
Axis win again
Column added for combo of 2011-2012 points, and column added with my subjective tier rankings
If you disagree with a 1-2-3 tier rating I made, please PM me and I will re-consider. Again, these rankings are just for fun, and serve to provide everyone with up-to-date W/L records and PCT for the league year.I think the accuracy of the points and rankings will improve as more results come in!
-
2012 League record for Axis is 18-7, and it’s 12-6 in the tournament. This is tracked on the 3rd tab.
-
I am please to announce another improvement to my spreadsheet.
Recognizing that player who play more will tend to amass more points (or negative points), I have calculated the average points per game played. I’m thinking this might actually be the best stat that I have developed so far, for measuring player skill over the league games of 2011 and 2012. Review them, and see what you think.I am adjusting the tier level of 2 players, and will be recalculating points accordingly. Spreadsheet to follow.
-
Spreadsheet
-
Forgot to re-order after re-ranking…
-
For comparitive purposes the top 10 from 2011 finished with these ppg numbers:
1.385 (13 games) Â
1.1 (10 games)
0.8 (10)
0.909 (11)
0.423 (26)
0.462 (13)
1.167 (6)
0.5 (10)
0.273 (11)
-0.091 (22) -
For comparitive purposes the top 10 from 2011 finished with these ppg numbers:
1.385 (13 games) �Â
1.1 (10 games)
0.8 (10)
0.909 (11)
0.423 (26)
0.462 (13)
1.167 (6)
0.5 (10)
0.273 (11)
-0.091 (22)No, those are no longer my top 10 for 2011
I actually went back and re-scored points
I’ll re-sort -
Actually, I’m thinking a better order for the rankings is points per game
For 2011, that would be (minimum 5 games):
Gamer 1.385
Tyzoq 1.167
Dutchman 1.1
LL .909
Zhukov .8
Dragon .5
JWW .462
Bold .423
Billy .273
SouL 0 -
Rankings re-sorted by 2012 PPG
2011/2012 combination of PPG also included -
Now that is a cool chart 8-)
-
Nice to see you say that, because if I hadn’t just re-sorted by PPG you would be the top dog now!
-
Updated
-
Updated
-
Updated
Suggested Topics
