S04 - Risingdragon (allies + 12) vs. Zhukov4 (axis)

[Zhukov44]

Sorry gonna make a quick adjustment.  hold on pls.

[Zhukov44]

4 arm ita>fra

01_rd_zhuk_t_11ag.AAM

[Zhukov44]

uploaded wrong map.  sorry dont know what happened.

Use this please.

01_rd_zhuk_t_11ag.AAM

[RisingDragon]

R11
3 inf 1 rtl 1 ac

-bul mt
cau 1 arm blitz twol
-far mt
yak 1 arm blitz twol
-stc mt
yak 1 arm blitz twol
-per mt
kaz 1 arm blitz twol
-ind sbr
cau 1 bmb
aa
Rolls: 1@1; Total Hits: 01@1: (3)
b
Rolls: 1@6; Total Hits: 11@6: (3)

[RisingDragon]

ind -3

ncm
ind-chi 1 bmb
per-cau 1 arm
far-yak 1 arm
stc-yak 1 arm
bul-ukr 1 arm
kar-bst 1 inf
bst-epl 2 inf
yak-eve 2 inf
yak-nov 1 arm
nov-chi 2 inf
kaz-cau 4 inf 1 arm
rus-cau 2 arm
euk-cau 7 arm
euk-ukr 1 aa
epl-ukr 3 inf
bst-ukr 2 inf
cau-z5 1 ftr
ukr-cau 3 inf

place
z5 1 ac
cau 3 inf 1 rtl

41

[RisingDragon]

map

01_rd_zhuk_t_11bR.AAM

[Zhukov44]

(fixed map to have 4 ger arm ita>fra as indicated before)

Japan 11, has 63, 3 rpr, buy 8 inf aa fig 4 arm

CM
12 arm ind>trj
3 inf art arm bry>blitz stc>far

NCM
inf aa ind, 2 inf mad>per
fleet 4 figs 32, ac 37, 2 fig nin>36
5 arm bur, arm fic>ind
inf fic, arm hup>bur
3 arm nin>yun
inf nin>sik
inf sui, 3 arm man, 2 fig 62, inf hup>nin
2 inf man>sui
2 inf 2 arm jap>fic
2 inf jap>man
dd 62>52
ss 52>48
4 fig fra, fig 32>ita
2 fig pol, fig ger>fra

place 2 inf aa ind, 2 inf arm man, 4 inf 3 arm fig jap
collect 49+15=64, has 64.

01_rd_zhuk_t_11cJ.AAM

[Zhukov44]

hmm, slight change pls

fig ger, 3 fig ita>fra
fig 36>ita

01_rd_zhuk_t_11cJ.AAM

[RisingDragon]

fixed to update japanese money

UK11
2 ac 2 saved

[RisingDragon]

-per mt
kaz 1 inf twol
-ind sbr
egy 1 bmb
-nwe 2 inf
gbr 2 inf via z7
z5 2 ftr
z12 1 ftr
-fra stack
gbr 1 inf 1 rtl
z5-z7 2 bb

ind
aa
Rolls: 1@1; Total Hits: 01@1: (5)
b
Rolls: 1@6; Total Hits: 11@6: (2)

[RisingDragon]

ind -2

nwe
Rolls: 2@1 3@3; Total Hits: 12@1: (4, 3)3@3: (1, 5, 5)
d
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (6, 3)

[RisingDragon]

nwe
a
Rolls: 2@1 3@3; Total Hits: 22@1: (5, 6)3@3: (4, 2, 3)
d
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)

[RisingDragon]

nwe twol

fra
a
Rolls: 2@2 2@4; Total Hits: 32@2: (2, 1)2@4: (2, 5)

[RisingDragon]

fra hwlo 3 inf…finally a bombard >2  :-D

ncm
z5-z7 fleet
nwe-z5 1 ftr
nwe-z7 2 ftr
alg-gbr 1 inf 1 rtl
kar-bst 1 inf
bel-bst 1 inf
kar-rus 3 arm
ukr-rus 1 arm
kaz-cau 1 inf 1 rtl
chi-rus 2 arm
chi-kaz 1 inf 1 aa
egy-lib 1 inf 1 arm
egy-cng  1 arm
ind-ukr 1 bmb
ukr-z12 1 ftr
egy-z34 1 ftr

place
z34 2 ac

37

01_rd_zhuk_t_11dUK.AAM

[Zhukov44]

For some reason I thought you couldn’t place acs there, but it seems I was mistaken about the rules.

Italy 11, has 19, 9 rpr, buy 3 inf

CM
2 inf arm fig ita>blk

Blk
Rolls: 2@1 2@3; Total Hits: 22@1: (2, 4)2@3: (3, 1)
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (3, 3)

[Zhukov44]

blk t nl

NCM
2 arm ger>ita
fig blk>34

place 3 inf
collect 9 has 10.

01_rd_zhuk_t_11ei.AAM

[RisingDragon]

yeah, had to learn this once the hard way.

usa11
1 inf 4 ftr

-z34 1 dd 4 ac 1 cru 6 ftr 1 bb 2 trn
z12 3 ftr
alg 1 bmb
z14 6 ftr
lib 1 ftr 3 bmb
egy 1 ftr

a
Rolls: 11@3 4@4; Total Hits: 911@3: (4, 3, 2, 2, 1, 5, 3, 6, 6, 4, 3)4@4: (3, 1, 5, 3)

OOL?

[Zhukov44]

terrible.  bb hit, cru, ac, figs

[Zhukov44]

Mostly i feel dumb for not having my acs loaded.  But certainly I should have been more deliberate and double check the rule.

[RisingDragon]

Sorry.  It was that last fighter leaving the nest that priced me in to the battle…given the potential dual uk ac sacrifice.  My understanding of the rules is if u sink the ac’s w your sub, ftrs can land on a territory i control of my choosing right (eg sud).

d
Rolls: 5@2 1@3 7@4; Total Hits: 55@2: (5, 3, 2, 4, 6)1@3: (5)7@4: (6, 2, 6, 1, 2, 6, 4)