Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

[jim010]

London 2

att
Rolls: 2@2 3@3 3@4; Total Hits: 52@2: (5, 2)3@3: (5, 1, 5)3@4: (3, 3, 1)

def
Rolls: 4@2 2@4; Total Hits: 24@2: (4, 5, 3, 4)2@4: (4, 2)

[jim010]

Lose 1 fht, 1 art

London 3

att
Rolls: 1@2 3@3 2@4; Total Hits: 41@2: (2)3@3: (6, 1, 2)2@4: (6, 1)

def
Rolls: 1@4; Total Hits: 11@4: (2)

[jim010]

NCM

Fin to Nor
5 inf

Paris to Wge
5 tanks

Paris to Wfr
1 art

Ger to Pol
9 inf, 1 art, 3 AA

Bul to Rom
2 inf

Wge to Ger
3 AA

London to sz110
1 fht, 1 tac

London to sz112
1 fht, 1 tac

Place

sz112
5 TT, 1 CV, 1 DD

[jim010]

I will have to go back and see what your income was.

[jim010]

London = 29 tt’s + 1 saved = 30

On your turn you saved $1, plus you collected $32 after -$2 sub damage for a total of $33.  With $1 more damage, you should have had $32.

JimandStirl vs. Cromwell UK 1.AAM

[jim010]

@jim010:

Germany

Buys

1 CV, 1 DD, 5 TT save $1

I had $68 to spend, and only spent $59.  I actually saved $11.

Collect

$54 + $11 + $32 = $97

I don’t get a bonus for having UK anymore, though I believe.  If I do then I have $5 more.

JimandStirl vs. Cromwell 2aGer.AAM

[jim010]

Wrong map.

JimandStirl vs. Cromwell 2aGer.AAM

[jim010]

@Cromwell:

Wow, aren’t you dicey, Jim…heck no, I don’t scramble. Russia’s going to be a bear, literally.

Just testing the waters with this Alpha 3, that’s all.  I want to see what possibilities there are.

[Chromwell]

Russia 2

Purchase: 1 INF, 5 ARM, 1 ART

Combat

Epl

3 INF Bessarabia
1 MECH, 1 ARM Bry
1 FTR Novgorod

Poland

6 INF Baltic
1 MECH, 1 ARM Belarus
2 ARM, 1 TAC, 2 FTR Novgorod

Pre-combat AA Fire above Poland:
Rolls: 3@1; Total Hits: 03@1: (6, 3, 6)

[Chromwell]

Combat Round One

Poland

A
Rolls: 7@1 5@3 1@4; Total Hits: 67@1: (3, 5, 1, 1, 1, 2, 5)5@3: (5, 5, 1, 2, 4)1@4: (4)

D
Rolls: 10@2; Total Hits: 510@2: (2, 2, 3, 6, 4, 1, 5, 3, 1, 2)

Epl

A
Rolls: 4@1 2@3; Total Hits: 24@1: (6, 2, 4, 5)2@3: (2, 2)

D
Rolls: 5@2; Total Hits: 05@2: (6, 5, 5, 4, 5)

[Chromwell]

Combat Round Two

Poland

A
Rolls: 2@1 5@3 1@4; Total Hits: 42@1: (4, 6)5@3: (1, 1, 2, 1, 4)1@4: (5)

D
Rolls: 7@2; Total Hits: 37@2: (2, 1, 3, 4, 5, 2, 5)

Epl

A
Rolls: 4@1 2@3; Total Hits: 34@1: (5, 1, 1, 2)2@3: (4, 2)

D
Rolls: 3@2; Total Hits: 13@2: (4, 2, 6)

[Chromwell]

Combat Round Three

Poland

A
Rolls: 4@3 1@4; Total Hits: 14@3: (4, 6, 4, 6)1@4: (1)

D
Rolls: 3@2; Total Hits: 13@2: (6, 3, 2)

[Chromwell]

Combat Round Four

Poland

A
Rolls: 3@3 1@4; Total Hits: 23@3: (2, 6, 2)1@4: (5)

D
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 12@2: (3, 1)

[Chromwell]

Combat

Walk-in Finland with 1 INF from Karelia

NCM

1 FTR Epl to Novgorod
1 FTR, 1 TAC from Poland to Novgorod
7 INF, 1 ART, 2 AA Gun to Baltic States
1 INF, 1 ART Smo to Belarus
2 INF Rostov to S. Ukraine
5 INF, 2 AA Moscow to Bryansk
9 INF, AA from Bury to Yak
9 INF, AA from Sak to Bury
1 SUB from sz 112 to sz 125
BB to sz 114

Placement: 1 INF, 1 ART, 1 ARM in S. Eukr
                3 ARM in Novgorod
                1 ARM in Russia

IPC

41 tt’s + 8 NO = 49 IPC’s

JimandStirl vs. Cromwell Russia 2.AAM

[Chromwell]

Oh, your German IPC total should be minus 1 IPC for the convoy disruption in sz 97.

Also, you stated before that you bought 1 Carrier (16 IPC), 1 DD (8), 5 TT (35 IPC), which equals 59 IPC. You started with a total of 68 IPC, which is 9 IPC saved from your 59 IPC buy, not 11. From where did you get 11 IPC saved?

It seems you had 50 tt’s + 9 saved + 5 NO (Denmark, Norway) - 1 Convoy Disruption in sz 97 + 32 IPC from London = 95 IPC

You’re correct that Germany no longer has London NO.

[jim010]

I got my numbers crossed.  I was thinking 69 - 58.

I’m checking into the convoy issue.

I may have to go for Stirling again.

[jim010]

@Cromwell:

Oh, your German IPC total should be minus 1 IPC for the convoy disruption in sz 97.

I checked the map.  The convoy disruption is included.  I should be down $2 from my miscounting my saved money.

[Chromwell]

How can you tell the map includes it?

I would prefer a breakdown of the collection at the end of our turn with tt’s, convoy disruptions, etc. Your 54 tt’s number was inaccurate in either the actual tt’s or, if you included other factors in this number, as the designation of ‘tt’. This is confusing.

[jim010]

The map has a table thatat the bottm that calculates all income and deducts convoy disruption for you and adds bonus money.  It is the table that shows unit counts.

The $54 is accurate.

[Chromwell]

Yeah, I see how it works now. You’re right, 54 was accurate as a number that included your + 5 NO, -1 convoy disruption and 50 tt’s. Makes sense.