Jim010/Stirling vs Cromwell

[Chromwell]

Ok, that’s reasonable. The new turn order has been posted, so I assume we are going with that, which means Italy is up next.

sz 97

A
Rolls: 1@4 4@3 1@2; Total Hits: 31@4: (4)4@3: (2, 6, 5, 5)1@2: (2)

D
Rolls: 1@4 1@3; Total Hits: 01@4: (5)1@3: (6)

[Chromwell]

NCM

1 FTR (which started combat move from London) and 1 FTR (which started combat move in Gib) land on Carrier in sz 97.

1 TAC land in Malta.

1 FTR from sz 97 lands in Egypt.

1 BB sz 111 to sz 118

1 FTR sz 106 to Que

1 FTR sz 110 to London

2 INF London via trns sz 109 to sz 88 unload in Sur

1 INF, 1 ART Ont to Que

2 INF, 1 ART, 1 ARM Alx to Egypt.

2 INF Saf to Rho.

1 DD sz 71 to sz 81.

trns sz 98 to sz 81.

BB sz 37 to sz 39

DD sz 39 to sz 76

1 INF WIND Activates E.Pers

2 INF India to WIND

2 INF Malaya to Shan State

1 INF Sco to London

1 FTR, 1 TAC, 3 INF India to Bur

Placement: 5 INF London, 1 IC Egypt, 2 INF, 1 ART in India, trns in sz 39

IPC

London = 29 tt’s + 1 saved = 30
Calcutta = 17 tt’s

JimandStirl vs. Cromwell UK 1.AAM

[jim010]

Italy

Buys

1 fht

CM

sz96 to sz97
1 DD

sz95 to sz97
1 DD, 1 CA

sz95 to sz93
1 sb

Nit to sz93
1 bmb

Nit to sz97
1 fht

Sit to sz97
1 fht

Tob to Alex
1 inf

Iso to Ken
1 inf

sz96 to sz92
1 TT (load from Lib 1 inf, 1 art to Alg)

Tob to Tun
1 tank, 1 mec

sz95 to sz92
1 TT (load from Sit 1 inf, from Nit 1 art to Mor)

Nit to Sfr
2 inf, 1 art, 1 tank

[jim010]

Battle of sz93
1 sb, 1 bmb vs 1 DD, 1 CA

att
Rolls: 1@2 1@4; Total Hits: 21@2: (1)1@4: (2)

[jim010]

def
Rolls: 1@2 1@3; Total Hits: 21@2: (1)1@3: (3)

[jim010]

Battle of sz97
2 DD, 1 CA, 2 fht vs 1 DD, 1 CA, 1 CV, 2 fht

att
Rolls: 2@2 3@3; Total Hits: 22@2: (6, 1)3@3: (6, 1, 6)

[jim010]

What are your losses?

[jim010]

By the way, did you deduct -3 for the German sub in sz106 instead of -2?

[Chromwell]

I’d like to declare my losses after I see the Defense roll. Since you’re likely offline, I’ll go ahead and roll for myself and declare ool in that context.

D
Rolls: 2@4 1@3 1@2; Total Hits: 42@4: (2, 3)1@3: (3)1@2: (2)

And, no, I didn’t deduct anything actually. Sorry about that, feel free to reduce UK Europe to 27. Once the new rules are posted, you would have to roll two die rather than have a freebie.  :-)

[jim010]

Actually, you are supposed to declare losses before you roll.  It is in the rulebook, and in battles like this, it is important that you do so.  You are not supposed to have the luxury of knowing your hits.

[Chromwell]

Where in the rulebook?

[Chromwell]

I would have chosen the same regardless - I just felt better about having the roll in context. In any event, we don’t have a “casualty strip” and we do not require ool for every battle.

[jim010]

Page 17 under Step 3 in Pacific manual… i don’t have the Europe one handy, but it is the same rule.

After attacking player has rolled for all attacking units, the defender chooses one unit for each hit scored and moves it behind the casualty strip.

[jim010]

@Cromwell:

I would have chosen the same regardless - I just felt better about having the roll in context. In any event, we don’t have a “casualty strip” and we do not require ool for every battle.

No we don’t, but in naval battles, it can be important and I will ask for losses.

I still need your losses.

[Chromwell]

DD and Cruiser.

[jim010]

retreat.

Battle of Mor
1 inf, 1art vs 1 inf

att
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (4, 5)

def
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)

[jim010]

Mor 2

att
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 22@2: (1, 2)

def
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)

[jim010]

Battle of Alg
1 inf, 1 art vs 1 inf

att
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 22@2: (1, 2)

def
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)

[jim010]

Battle of Tun
1 mec, 1 tank vs 1 inf

att
Rolls: 1@1 1@3; Total Hits: 01@1: (4)1@3: (4)

def
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)

[jim010]

Tun 2

att
Rolls: 1@1 1@3; Total Hits: 11@1: (4)1@3: (2)

def
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)