Japan:
Kwangtung: +0.68 swing
Sea zone 37: +0.88 swing
Sea zone 35: +0.07 swing
Hunan: +0.69 swing
Yunnan: +0.07 swing
Philippines: -0.36 swing
Total for round 1: +1.69 in favor of the Allies
Combat Results:
Waf: TWOL Undefended
Cng: TWOL Undefended
Kaz: TWLO 1 Inf
Aus: TWLO 2 Inf
Non-Combat Moves:
Trj: Tank(Egy)
Sz36: BB+CV+TT(Sz34)
Sz48: DD+CV+SS(Sz36)
FIC: 4 Tanks+4 INf(Jpn) Via 2 TT(Sz61>Sz36), 2 TT(Sz60>Sz36)
Sin: 4 Inf(Chi), 2 Tanks(Man)
Chi: 2 Inf(Man)
Nov: 2 Inf(Yak)
Yak: Inf+Tank(Bry)
Kaz: AA(Cau)
Ind: AA(FIC)
Mobilisation:
FIC: IC 15
Ind: 3 Tanks 15
Jpn: 4 Tanks, 2 Inf 26
Collect 59 IPC, 1 saved, 60 IPC On Hand
So Japan wants the IC in Cau eh!
I don’t think i will oblige with that one.
Am I that obvious? Chuckles
I hope I can see a move like that coming
it’s already tough enough.
US7
Builds
with 43
I know this has been a mistake in the past but i’m going to anyway
8inf=18
2tank=10
IC=15
save 0
Combat
2bmr UK SBR on SEu
inf tank UK via tt cc ftr sz5 land in EEu
inf Kar to EEu vs 2inf
3inf Kar to Bel
2ftr sz5 to Bel vs 2inf
SEu aagun vs 2bmr
Rolling 2d6:
(2, 4)
SEu SBR 2bmr
Rolling 2d6:
(1, 2)
EEu attack(1)2inf tank ftr cc bombard
Rolls: 2@1 3@3; Total Hits: 12@1: (4, 2)3@3: (3, 5, 6)
defend 2inf
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (3, 3)
EEu attack(2)2inf tank ftr
Rolls: 2@1 2@3; Total Hits: 12@1: (6, 3)2@3: (6, 3)
defend inf
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)
Bel attack(1)3inf 2ftr
Rolls: 3@1 2@3; Total Hits: 13@1: (4, 4, 2)2@3: (4, 2)
defend 2inf
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 12@2: (2, 4)
Bel attack(2)2inf 2ftr
Rolls: 2@1 2@3; Total Hits: 02@1: (6, 6)2@3: (5, 5)
defend inf
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)
Bel attack(3)inf 2ftr
Rolls: 1@1 2@3; Total Hits: 11@1: (3)2@3: (2, 4)
defend inf
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)
Results
SEu IC takes 3 damage 6 total
EEu twol
Bel cbnt loss of 3inf
Non combat
2bmr SEu to UK
ftr EEu to sz5
2ftr Bel to sz5
ftr EUS to UK
3inf 3tank UK via 3tt sz5 land in Kar
4inf 4tank ECa via 4tt sz2 land in UK
4inf art EUS to ECa
3tank WUS to ECa
sub sz45 to sz52
aagun Kar to Nwy
Build placement
6inf EUS(not 8)
2tank WUS
IC Nwy
Collect income
Earned 44 saved 0= 44 IPC’s
Rus8
Builds
with 14
3inf=9
tank=5
save 0
Combat
none
non combat
sub sz33 to sz32
aagun Rus to Arc
Build placement
3inf tank Rus
Collect income
Earned 12 saved 0= 12 IPC’s
The difference in this game is your fleet sitting in Sz5. Now I have to worry about the brits AND the US hitting Ger OR EEu in a 1-2. It seems i cannot cover Weu AND Ger AND EEu even with the Jap air force.
Ger 8
Builds 39
Repair 6
6 Tanks 30
–--------
Save 3
Combat:
WRu: Inf(Cau), Inf(Ukr), Bmr(WEu) Vs Inf
EEu: 4 Inf(Ger)+4 Ftr(WEu) Vs 2 Inf+Tank
WRu: Inf(Cau), Inf(Ukr), Bmr(WEu) Vs Inf
Rolls: 2@1 1@4; Total Hits: 12@1: (5, 4)1@4: (1)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)
EEu: 4 Inf(Ger)+4 Ftr(WEu) Vs 2 Inf+Tank
Rolls: 4@1 4@3; Total Hits: 34@1: (6, 4, 1, 3)4@3: (4, 2, 2, 5)
Rolls: 2@2 1@3; Total Hits: 12@2: (1, 5)1@3: (5)
Combat Results:
WRu: TWLO 1 Inf
EEu: TWLO 1 Inf
Non-Combat Moves:
WEu: 6 Inf(SEu)
Ger: 7 Tanks(WEu), 5 Tanks(Blk)
Ukr: 2 Inf(Blk)
Sz41: SS(Sz38)
WEu: 4 Ftr(EEu), Bmr(WRu)
Bel: Inf(Ukr)
Ukr: 2 Inf(Blk)
Blk: 9 Inf(Ger)
Builds:
SEu: 6 Tanks
Collect 39 IPC, 3 saved, 42 IPC On Hand
I hadn’t noticed, you rank as a Destroyer now and I as a Fighter, congrats to both of us.
Were movin on up
UK8
Builds
with 21
7inf=21
save 0
Combat
2bmr UK SBR SEu
inf Kar to EEu
2inf UK via tt cc bb ftr sz5 land in EEu
3bmr UK to EEu vs 3inf
2inf 6tank Kar to Bel vs inf
inf 2ftr Rus to Eve vs inf
SEu aagun vs 2bmr
Rolling 2d6:
(3, 3)
SEu SBR 2bmr
Rolling 2d6:
(3, 5)