No scramble
11L-DM(allies+7) vs EB(axis) Game 3
-
Bur
2 inf, 1 ftr
Rolls: 2@1 1@3; Total Hits: 12@1: (5, 3)1@3: (2)1 inf
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5) -
Results
sz 5 - cleared with 2 ftrs
fra - taken with 1 arm, 1 bom
bur - taken, wolNon-Combat Move
1 ftr to ind (bur)
2 ftrs to sz 7 (sz 5)
1 bom to trj (fra)
2 inf to sud from eafPlacement
2 inf, 1 ftr on Ind
3 trns in Sz 7
3 inf, 1 arm on UKCollect 39 + 10 (NO) = 49 total
-
Italy3
9 buys 1arm 1artcombat
Fra - 3inf 1ftr ItaFra
Rolls: 3@1 1@3; Total Hits: 23@1: (5, 5, 1)1@3: (3)
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (1) -
Fra twlo 1inf
noncombat
1inf Bul - Ita via 1trn sz16 to sz14
2cru 1bb sz16 - sz14
1ftr Fra - Itabuild
1arm 1art Itacollect
10 + 5 = 15 -
US Round 4
Buy 1 ac, 2 ftrs, 1 dd, 1 sub
Combat Move
1) Sz 48 - trn, 2 ac, 4 ftrs vs. 2 dd (sz 45), 7 ftrs (4 aus, 2 sz 56, 1 ind)
-
Sz 48
2 dd, 7 ftrs
Rolls: 2@2 7@3; Total Hits: 42@2: (3, 5)7@3: (5, 4, 4, 1, 3, 3, 3)trn, 2 ac, 4 ftrs
Rolls: 2@2 4@4; Total Hits: 42@2: (5, 2)4@4: (2, 6, 2, 2) -
I’m going to assume max defense for OOL
Sz 48 rd 2
5 ftrs
Rolls: 5@3; Total Hits: 25@3: (6, 3, 5, 2, 5)trn, 2 ftrs
Rolls: 2@4; Total Hits: 12@4: (6, 1) -
Results
sz 48 - cleared wiht 4 ftrs
Non-Combat Move
2 ftrs to aus
2 ftrs to sz 41
1 ac to sz 41 from sz 45
2 inf to aus from sz 45 (trn to sz 41)
1 ftr to sz 56 from wus
1 inf to wcan from wus
1 trn to sz 1 from sz 7
1 bom to ecan from ukPlacement
1 ac, 2 ftrs, 1 dd, 1 sub in Sz 56
Collect 38 + 10 (NO) = 48 total
-
DM you are right to assume max defense. I put myself in such bad situations I often need it.
Ger4
55 buys 11 armcombat
Arc - 1inf 1art 1arm 1bmb Kar
Bel - 2arm Epl
Euk - 2inf 1ftr Epl
Ukr - 3arm 4ftr EplArc
Rolls: 2@2 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 12@2: (4, 4)1@3: (4)1@4: (2)
Rolls: 2@2 1@3; Total Hits: 12@2: (3, 1)1@3: (6) -
Arc rd2
Rolls: 1@2 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 21@2: (2)1@3: (6)1@4: (1)
Rolls: 1@2 1@3; Total Hits: 11@2: (6)1@3: (2) -
Arc twlo 1inf 1art
Bel
Rolls: 2@3; Total Hits: 02@3: (5, 4)
Rolls: 1@2 1@3; Total Hits: 01@2: (6)1@3: (4) -
Bel rd2
Rolls: 2@3; Total Hits: 12@3: (6, 2)
Rolls: 1@2 1@3; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)1@3: (4) -
Bel rd3
Rolls: 2@3; Total Hits: 02@3: (5, 6)
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (2) -
Bel rd4
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (2)
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (3) -
Bel holds lost 2arm
Euk
Rolls: 2@1 1@3; Total Hits: 12@1: (2, 6)1@3: (2)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (4) -
Euk twol
Ukr
Rolls: 7@3; Total Hits: 27@3: (6, 6, 6, 1, 5, 1, 5)
Rolls: 3@1 1@3; Total Hits: 33@1: (1, 1, 1)1@3: (5) -
ouch lost 1ftr 2arm
Ukr rd2
Rolls: 4@3; Total Hits: 24@3: (3, 6, 4, 3)
Rolls: 1@2 1@3; Total Hits: 11@2: (1)1@3: (5) -
Ukr twlo 2ftr 3arm
Russian inf were deadly accurate!
noncombat
1bmb Arc - Ger
3ftr Ukr - Epl
7arm Ger - Epl
1inf Pol - BstBuild
9arm Ger
2arm Karcollect
40 + 15 = 55 -
Oh wow. Yeah, that was some good defense.
@ExtraBilly:
DM you are right to assume max defense. I put myself in such bad situations I often need it.
It made sense in that case. Since you took Ngu your ftrs had a spot to land.
-
Russia Round 4
Buy 7 inf, 2 arm
Combat Move
None
Non-Combat Move
aa to mos from bel
3 inf to mos from caucPlacement
4 inf, 2 arm on Mos
3 inf on CaucCollect 19
Kind of a weak turn for Russia.
Suggested Topics
