No discussion for a while now…
Any new conclusions about this strategy?
What’s about an airbase at Gibraltar and moving Egypt fleet west? Yet, I guess there was this topic deep down at forum’s splanchnic times ago but couldn’t find it…
If London falls, doesn’t UK move it’s capital to Ottawa and continue to collect income? I know it surrenders it’s income once London falls, however I was under the impression they had a special ability to transfer Capitals
No they don’t collect income until they recapture London.
If London falls, doesn’t UK move it’s capital to Ottawa and continue to collect income? I know it surrenders it’s income once London falls, however I was under the impression they had a special ability to transfer Capitals
I think the capital-transfer concept has been used in a number of house rules, but it’s not in the official rules.
Only game I think of is HBG 39 game is Ottawa or Capital in South Africa becomes new Capital and UK collects income on next turn.
Ahhhhh….I stopped playing AA G 40 after HBG Global 39 and then stopped playing HBG G 39 after HBG G 36 came out. I just recently started playing AA G 40 again and making ton of errors due to that fact. Also when I played AA G 40, my game was vastly different than the OOB rules. I even had a set up for the Dutch in the DEI with a recruitment roll and income. Spain and Turkey could be aligned to either power and Russia could attack Finland even if it was taken by the Germans without declaring or starting a war with Germany and also had a neutral bonus if not at war with Germany for 3 IPC’s… My set up was different too. UK had Battlecruisers that took 2 hits to destroy, a UK battleship added in the Med and US had to additional battleships in the starting set up one in Europe and one in Hawaii. Also I took the power of the bombers away, SBR was slightly different and fighters on CAP could attack submarines, and finally used a D-12 combat system.
I will be coming to play in Young Grasshoppers invitational in September so I am working to re honing my OOB rules and strategies. I need to clean up my errors and redefine my Allied strategies as I have noticed I am a tad off due to forgetting the OOB rules
Looking forward to seeing you Gents in Canada.
With regards, a Semper Fi and Ooooh Raaah, Thank you for the responses
Leatherneckinlv
Ahhhhh….I stopped playing AA G 40 after HBG Global 39 and then stopped playing HBG G 39 after HBG G 36 came out. I just recently started playing AA G 40 again and making ton of errors due to that fact. Also when I played AA G 40, my game was vastly different than the OOB rules. I even had a set up for the Dutch in the DEI with a recruitment roll and income. Spain and Turkey could be aligned to either power and Russia could attack Finland even if it was taken by the Germans without declaring or starting a war with Germany and also had a neutral bonus if not at war with Germany for 3 IPC’s… My set up was different too. UK had Battlecruisers that took 2 hits to destroy, a UK battleship added in the Med and US had to additional battleships in the starting set up one in Europe and one in Hawaii. Also I took the power of the bombers away, SBR was slightly different and fighters on CAP could attack submarines, and finally used a D-12 combat system.
I will be coming to play in Young Grasshoppers invitational in September so I am working to re honing my OOB rules and strategies. I need to clean up my errors and redefine my Allied strategies as I have noticed I am a tad off due to forgetting the OOB rules
Looking forward to seeing you Gents in Canada.
With regards, a Semper Fi and Ooooh Raaah, Thank you for the responses
Leatherneckinlv
I love the spirt… carry on soldier.
Marine….haha…better than soldiers, we are says Master Yoda
Marine….haha…better than soldiers, we are says Master Yoda
Yes, this point of terminology actually came up a while ago, on page 1 of this thread:
You could always house rule “backup capitals”
After playing G36, what are the motives to go back down the simplicity scale? Time? Pure complexity? Players?