Wheatbeer (Allies) vs The Definitive S (Axis) Global Alpha+2 Tech

[TheDefinitiveS]

HUN cwol

NCM

KWA
1 fig, 1 tac from HUN
1 tank, 1 inf from JAP via 1 trns in sz 6
1 inf from OKI, 1 art from MAN via 1 trns in sz 19
1 fig from FOR
1 fig from OKI
2 fig, 2 tac from MAN
2 fig, 2 atc, 2 bmb from JAP

ANH
2 inf from KSU

KSI
1 inf, 1 art from KSU
2 inf from MAN via 1 trns in sz 20

CAR
1 fig from sz 33

sz 33
1 fig from KOR
1 AC, 1 fig, 1 tac, 1 DD from sz 6

sz 36
1 BB, 1 ss from sz 19
1 BB, 1 AC, 1 tac, 1 fig, 1 ss from sz 6

sz 35
1 DD from sz 19
1 CA from sz 20
1 CA, 1 DD from sz 6

JEH
4 inf, 1 AAGun from MAN

MAN
4 inf from KOR

Mobilize Units
1 mIC in KOR
1 trns in sz 6
1 inf, 1 m.inf in JAP

Collect Income
29(territories)+10(NOs)= 39 IPCs

Wheatbeer vs The Definitive S - 1cJ - NCM.AAM

[wheatbeer]

US1

Buy (52/52)

2 sub, 3 dest, 1 carrier

Non-combat:
1 dest SZ10 >> SZ8
1 dest, 1 sub SZ35 >> SZ49
1 inf, 1 art wus load trans SZ10 >> SZ26 unload haw
1 trans (empty) SZ26 >> SZ10
1 cru, 1 bsh, 1 carrier, 1 tact, 1 fig SZ10 >> SZ26
1 fig wus >> haw
1 strat cus >> haw
1 fig eus >> wus
1 tank cus >> wus
2 mech cus >> wus

Mobilize:
2 sub, 1 dest SZ101
2 dest, 1 carrier SZ10

Collect 52 IPC

Wheatbeer vs The Definitive S - 1dUS.AAM

[wheatbeer]

China 1

Buy (12/12)
3 art

Non-combat
3 inf yun >> sze
2 inf kwe >> sze
2 inf sui >> she

Mobilize:
3 art sze

Collect 15 IPC

Wheatbeer vs The Definitive S - 1eC.AAM

[wheatbeer]

UK1

bsh SZ110 repaired

Buy London (27/28)
9 inf

Buy Calcutta (17/17)
1 fig
1 trans

Combat:

SZ112
1 cru, 1 bsh SZ110
1 dest SZ109
1 fig sco
2 fig uk
1 fig wfr

SZ91
1 dest SZ106
1 fig gib
1 fig mal

ETH
1 inf sud
1 mech egy
1 inf, 1 art alx load trans SZ108 >> SZ76 unload eth
1 cru SZ98 >> SZ76 bombard
1 cru SZ39 >> SZ76 bombard
1 tact SZ98

need scrambling orders for SZ112

[wheatbeer]

map for ref

Wheatbeer vs The Definitive S - 1fUK combat.AAM

[TheDefinitiveS]

Scramble 2 tac, 1 fig from WGR. Please.

[TheDefinitiveS]

OOL - least defensive value first.

[wheatbeer]

SZ112

A 1 dest, 1 cru, 1 bsh, 4 fig

Rolls: 1@2 5@3 1@4; Total Hits: 51@2: (2)5@3: (3, 1, 1, 5, 6)1@4: (2)

D 1 carrier, 1 cru, 3 tact, 1 fig, 1 damaged bsh

Rolls: 1@2 4@3 2@4; Total Hits: 51@2: (2)4@3: (5, 3, 1, 5)2@4: (2, 2)

[wheatbeer]

so sink the carrier and 3 tact?

[TheDefinitiveS]

Yup.

[wheatbeer]

I am taking 1 bsh hit, dest + cru sunk, 2 fig downed

SZ112 r2

A 2 fig, 1 damaged bsh

Rolls: 2@3 1@4; Total Hits: 22@3: (1, 4)1@4: (1)

D 1 cru, 1 fig, 1 damaged bsh

Rolls: 1@3 2@4; Total Hits: 11@3: (4)2@4: (5, 1)

[wheatbeer]

I am losing 1 more fig

Would you rather hold onto the bsh or the fig?

[TheDefinitiveS]

Keep battleship.

[TheDefinitiveS]

Hang on whats at 3 , if its my cruiser lose it instead

[wheatbeer]

I had assumed you wanted that lost as one of my hits, I was just asking about the second since fig and bsh are both at 4.

[TheDefinitiveS]

Nevermind you got 2 hits I see.

[TheDefinitiveS]

Sorry about that, as you were.

[wheatbeer]

SZ112 r3

A 1 fig, 1 damaged bsh

Rolls: 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 11@3: (5)1@4: (4)

D 1 dmg bsh

Rolls: 1@4; Total Hits: 11@4: (1)

[wheatbeer]

No worries.

uk bsh sunk
SZ112 cleared (total uk loss 1 dest, 1 cru, 3 fig, 1 bsh)

[wheatbeer]

SZ91

A 1 dest, 2 fig

Rolls: 1@2 2@3; Total Hits: 11@2: (4)2@3: (2, 4)

D 2 sub

Rolls: 2@1; Total Hits: 12@1: (3, 1)