Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

Rules: Iraq and Persia

Axis & Allies Global 1940

1.0k

C

captainhook
last edited by

If conquered by the British, do those territories’ income go to the pacific or the european economy?
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0
X

Xandax
last edited by

On the European board - land goes to England/Europe
Only stuff on the pacific side goes to India.
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0
P

Pelanderfunk
last edited by

Remember that in the Alpha +2 rules, West India income goes to India and Western Canada income goes to London.
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0

Featured Topics

League rules idea: mulligans for patrons

Guadalcanal Tournament at Strategicon (Los Angeles) Feb. 17, 2024

T-shirts, Hats, and More

global 1940

177

anniversary

1914

1942 2nd ed

tips&tricks

bm3

video

axis & allies

Suggested Topics

C

A questionable excerpt from the aircraft carriers rules

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • Cernel

7

1
Votes

7
Posts

506
Views

S

Well on the board you generaly move stuff 1 at the time.
So the wording is a bit weird but what they try to say is that you only have to move the carrier if not moving it would cause planes to have no landing zone.

So its not earlier as in an earliers phase but earlier as in earlier in the NCB phase.

The game is already weird in that imo all movement should be simultanious. You cant start moving later and still expect to arive at the same time.
If you first await a combat resolution and then move your going to be later then if you are moving immediately.
I

[House Rules] China Convoy Zones?

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • Ichabod

10

0
Votes

10
Posts

507
Views

T

@simon33

They can also take the Denmark, Finland, Holland et al money with this proposal. Also for example, SZ 112 and 126? would be connected to Norway $, making the placement of convoying units more flexible. Youre right that mostly the money will be taken by the proper force, not convoyed, but this proposal increases the value of subs and puts a lot more money on the line. I agree in principle that the convoy zones chosen by the creator are themey and appropriate but its easy to go further and put alot more $$ at risk on the board sea/land.

I put a russian sub down in Game 191 just for fun (it cost me later) and I did successfully blow up both and all possible Normandy/norway money for one turn. What if the baltic was like that? This also goes back to Dave’s idea of splitting the adriatic (so to nerf taranto and divide Italy $$ into two convoy zones)
Y

Stupid A&A G40 Rules

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • Young Grasshopper

50

0
Votes

50
Posts

7.0k
Views

K

I don’t see a flight path on the map that would be shortened by being able to fly over the Pripet Marshes, so I suppose that it’s not particularly relevant from an A&A perspective whether or not planes can fly over them.
S

Rules question - activating and moving through friendly neutrals

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • Slovenehero

7

0
Votes

7
Posts

1.3k
Views

A

@Herr:

Politicians need more time than soldiers. The friendly neutral is expecting a formal delegation to pay a visit, not someone in a tank dashing by and waving “Hi! You’re with us now!”

But I agree that in the game, it’s a bit odd.

Yeah that’s basically it!
Allies stop and wave and Axis, well they…march. :-)

Fun aside, I agree with you, it is a bit odd.
G

Mongolia and Neutrals - rules summarized here

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • gamerman01

116

0
Votes

116
Posts

42.2k
Views

K

@gamerman01 said in Mongolia and Neutrals - rules summarized here:

@Krieghund will audit my answer above, but I think I got it.

You did indeed.
M

Rule clarification: Subs/Transports/Aircraft Carriers

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • MacNaughton

6

0
Votes

6
Posts

1.7k
Views

K

@Spendo02:

@Krieghund:

The US cannot win this battle. The fighters will continue to defend in the air until the battle is over. The Japanese fighters and US subs can’t hit each other, so the fighters will sink transports until the US retreats. If the US wishes to conduct this amphibious assault, it must bring units that are capable of hitting the fighters.

This is one of those unique situations where you are required to take Trn as losses before subs because that is all the unit can hit?

Yes. They just need to be the only legal selection for a loss. That might mean that planes have no other target (like this example), or that Sub hits have no other ship targets, or that the defenders hit everything else in a round of combat and need to assign some more hits before the defender retreats. Remember, the defender still has the option to retreat, if they can, and transports are only automatically destroyed when they’re attacked, not when attacking (unless the attacker has no place to retreat).
Q

Italy in Iraq…...which direction from there?

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • qwertyuiop

7

0
Votes

7
Posts

1.5k
Views

C

@lnmajor:

Just KILL everything in sight! :evil:

Now that sounds like an Axis&Allies idiom if I ever heard one!! :lol:
C

Political rules for all powers

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • calvinhobbesliker

9

0
Votes

9
Posts

1.8k
Views

S

@Krieghund:

“On its next turn”, not “for the next turn”.

Thank you!

72

Online

17.6k

Users

40.2k

Topics

1.7m

Posts