No, you can only place major IC’s on originally owned territory of that power. So Germany could place is on norway since they originally owned it but no other power could since…well it’s Germany’s original territory.
IC in Philippines
-
Hello all,
is there a restriction for the US to place a minor IC in the Philippines at turn 1? I was sure there wasn’t, since its economic value is 2. However, tripleA does not allow it.
My question, is there such thing as a restriction for a max of structures (air-, naval-bases, ICs) related to the territories value? This would explain why a minor IC cannot be placed in the Philippines (there are already 2 bases). However there is no such rule that I am aware of. Can anybody help?
Thanks a lot. I hope this post is in the right thread, if not, please be indulgent and move it.
Greetings -
@Rulebook:
Restrictions on Placement
…
Place new facilities in any eligible territory that you have
controlled since the start of your turn. Unlike combat units,
facilities do not require that an industrial complex be in the
territory in which they are mobilized, and they do not count
against the number of units that an industrial complex may
mobilize (see above) if there is one there. Major industrial
complexes can only be built on originally controlled (not
captured) territories with an IPC value of 3 or higher. Minor
industrial complexes can be built only in territories with an IPC
value of 2 or higher. You can’t have more than one facility of
the same type (industrial complex, air base, or naval base) per
territory. Industrial complexes can’t be built on islands (see
“Islands,” page ‘8’).HTH :-)
-
Phil is an island, just that alone makes an IC impossible.
-
Looks like I have played it wrong a couple of times! Thanks for the swift clarification guys!
Suggested Topics
