Our gaming group has come to the conclusion that some bid is needed to balance the game for the Allies. In reading through the posts it seems to me that the general consensus is that the Allies need a bid of about 9-12.
My questions are:
Is a bid of 9-12 the current and reasonable amount? As we will not want to bid for a particular side, we will set a certain bid point for each game and then let people choose which side they want to be as some Players enjoy playing particular Powers. So what is a fair bid?My group usually goes 10-15, some where in the ball park of 8 to 14 is what everyone does.
Is this bid added as starting income to be spent on Turn 1?What Siparo said.
Is this bid added as units and money such as the Revised FIDA bid?Never played revised, and what is FIDA? Another government agency?
Is this bid added as units on the board with remainders as starting money?Siparo doesn’t do it, but my group allows it.
For any units placed on the board are there any restrictions? For example:
a) Must have a unit already in the territory / sea zone?
b) May not place more than X number of units?My group has 3 rules:
1. Must be one unit per territory/seazone.
2. Can only be placed in a territory/seazone where you already have units occupying it.
3. Can only be a unit that power has access to (china can be inf and art only).I would appreciate your kind thoughts and comments. Thank you…
1940 pacific and global
-
i dont quite understand how certain neutral territories work. examples being, java, dutch new guinea, celebes, and sumatra. can anyone explain these territories to me?
-
If you’ve played Pacific, these territories work the same way in Global. These specific territories can be occupied by UK or ANZAC forces during the noncombat phase in order to gain control of them and get their IPC’s. Japan can occupy them during the combat move, but doing so puts them at war with UK, ANZAC, and the US (not sure if US is immediately at war or must declare it during US turn) unless UK or ANZAC made an un[rovoked DoW on Japan earlier.
-
Yes. These particular territories are not neutral. They are Dutch possessions under UK protection. Only UK or ANZAC may take possession of them peacefully, and an Axis power must be at war with UK/ANZAC in order to attack them.
-
Yes. These particular territories are not neutral. They are Dutch possessions under UK protection. Only UK or ANZAC may take possession of them peacefully, and an Axis power must be at war with UK/ANZAC in order to attack them.
Would other allied powers (mainly the US) be able to take control of them peacefully?
-
No. The only way an Allied power other than UK or ANZAC can gain control of them is to recapture them from the Axis.
Suggested Topics
